Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.457
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dusturiah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial El-Faqih : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Hukum Islam Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, Akuntansi dan Perbankan (JESKaPe) Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law Al-Iqtishadiah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Al Fuadiy: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam JURISTA : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Quru’: Journal of Family Law and Culture Al-battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum An-nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law
Aulil Amri
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law

 1 
Hukum Terhadap Hibah Harta Bersama Kepada Anak Hasil Nikah Siri Aulil Amri; Tajul Iflah
El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law Vol 2 No 1 (2022): El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (441.813 KB) | DOI: 10.22373/hadhanah.v2i1.1675

Abstract

This article is motivated by the case at the Syar'iyah Court of Banda Aceh in Decision Number 283/Pdt.G/2019/Ms.Bna regarding grants originating from joint assets given to children from unregistered marriages. Even though the property is a joint property between a legal husband and wife obtained during the marriage period with a legal wife, in the property there is still part of the rights of the legal wife or first wife. However, the husband and wife donate the property to the child of the siri marriage without having the permission of the first wife. Therefore, researchers are interested in examining how the fiqh provisions relate to grants of joint property to children resulting from unregistered marriages, why the Panel of Judges of the Banda Aceh Syar'iyah Court rejected the plaintiff's lawsuit against the cancellation of joint property grants to children resulting from unregistered marriages, and what is the basis for the legal considerations. The research methods used are field research and library research. The results of the study state that the provisions in fiqh on the grant of joint property to children resulting from unregistered marriages are valid if there is permission from both parties who own the joint property. If a joint property grant is given to a child resulting from an unregistered marriage without permission from one of the donors, then the grant is invalid, because the condition for the property to be donated must be mil kultam, that is own property may not donate other people's property. The panel of judges at the Banda Aceh Syar'iyah Court rejected the plaintiff's claim against the cancellation of the joint property grant to a child resulting from an unregistered marriage in decision number 283/Pdt.G/2019/Ms.Bna because the case contained a formal defect in which the plaintiff occupied a minor. In Defendant III, minors do not have legal standing as litigants, that is, they do not have legal standing. Therefore, the judge could not accept the case. The plaintiff may re-file a lawsuit for the cancellation of the joint property grant (a new lawsuit) by not placing a minor as defendant III, only then can the judge process the case again.
Determination Of Child Care Rights Between Birthday Parents And Adopting Parents Misran Misran; Aulil Amri; Nur Fatin Adila Binti Idereh
El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law Vol 3 No 2 (2023): El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal of Family Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/hadhanah.v3i2.2750

Abstract

Adoption of children is regulated in the Deed of Registration of Appointment 1952 (Deed 253) for Muslims and non-Muslims and the Deed of Adoption 1952 (Deed 257) for non-Muslims. Among the cases involving the struggle for custody is the one that occurred at the Pahang Sharia High Court, in which the judge handed over a child to his biological parents while the child had been registered under the Deed of Registration of Appointment 1952 (Deed 253). Then, in the case at the Selangor High Court, the judge handed over custody rights to the adoptive parents while the adoption registration was invalid. There are two formulations of the problem in this thesis. Firstly, what are the considerations of the Pahang Sharia High Court judges in determining child custody between biological parents and adoptive parents? Second, what are the considerations of the judges of the Selangor High Court in determining child custody between biological parents and adoptive parents? This research uses the juridical-normative method and case studies. Data collection is also done with literature and documentation. The results of the study show that first, the consideration of the judges of the Pahang Sharia High Court in determining child custody of their biological parents is because the judge looks at their efforts to get their child back and they have full rights to the child. Second, the consideration of the judge of the Selangor High Court in determining child custody of the adoptive parents is important because the judge stated that the main thing is what is best for the child, and the child's biological parents also have several obstacles to looking after the child. Custody is closely related to the interests of the child and the guardians, if there is an imbalance in custody, then the rights and interests of the child need to take precedence over the interests of the guardians.
Hukum Terhadap Hibah Harta Bersama Kepada Anak Hasil Nikah Siri Aulil Amri; Tajul Iflah
El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law Vol 2 No 1 (2022): El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/hadhanah.v2i1.1675

Abstract

This article is motivated by the case at the Syar'iyah Court of Banda Aceh in Decision Number 283/Pdt.G/2019/Ms.Bna regarding grants originating from joint assets given to children from unregistered marriages. Even though the property is a joint property between a legal husband and wife obtained during the marriage period with a legal wife, in the property there is still part of the rights of the legal wife or first wife. However, the husband and wife donate the property to the child of the siri marriage without having the permission of the first wife. Therefore, researchers are interested in examining how the fiqh provisions relate to grants of joint property to children resulting from unregistered marriages, why the Panel of Judges of the Banda Aceh Syar'iyah Court rejected the plaintiff's lawsuit against the cancellation of joint property grants to children resulting from unregistered marriages, and what is the basis for the legal considerations. The research methods used are field research and library research. The results of the study state that the provisions in fiqh on the grant of joint property to children resulting from unregistered marriages are valid if there is permission from both parties who own the joint property. If a joint property grant is given to a child resulting from an unregistered marriage without permission from one of the donors, then the grant is invalid, because the condition for the property to be donated must be mil kultam, that is own property may not donate other people's property. The panel of judges at the Banda Aceh Syar'iyah Court rejected the plaintiff's claim against the cancellation of the joint property grant to a child resulting from an unregistered marriage in decision number 283/Pdt.G/2019/Ms.Bna because the case contained a formal defect in which the plaintiff occupied a minor. In Defendant III, minors do not have legal standing as litigants, that is, they do not have legal standing. Therefore, the judge could not accept the case. The plaintiff may re-file a lawsuit for the cancellation of the joint property grant (a new lawsuit) by not placing a minor as defendant III, only then can the judge process the case again.
Determination Of Child Care Rights Between Biological Parents And Adopting Parents Misran Misran; Aulil Amri; Nur Fatin Adila Binti Idereh
El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law Vol 3 No 2 (2023): El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal of Family Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/hadhanah.v3i2.2750

Abstract

Adoption of children is regulated in the Deed of Registration of Appointment 1952 (Deed 253) for Muslims and non-Muslims and the Deed of Adoption 1952 (Deed 257) for non-Muslims. Among the cases involving the struggle for custody is the one that occurred at the Pahang Sharia High Court, in which the judge handed over a child to his biological parents while the child had been registered under the Deed of Registration of Appointment 1952 (Deed 253). Then, in the case at the Selangor High Court, the judge handed over custody rights to the adoptive parents while the adoption registration was invalid. There are two formulations of the problem in this thesis. Firstly, what are the considerations of the Pahang Sharia High Court judges in determining child custody between biological parents and adoptive parents? Second, what are the considerations of the judges of the Selangor High Court in determining child custody between biological parents and adoptive parents? This research uses the juridical-normative method and case studies. Data collection is also done with literature and documentation. The results of the study show that first, the consideration of the judges of the Pahang Sharia High Court in determining child custody of their biological parents is because the judge looks at their efforts to get their child back and they have full rights to the child. Second, the consideration of the judge of the Selangor High Court in determining child custody of the adoptive parents is important because the judge stated that the main thing is what is best for the child, and the child's biological parents also have several obstacles to looking after the child. Custody is closely related to the interests of the child and the guardians, if there is an imbalance in custody, then the rights and interests of the child need to take precedence over the interests of the guardians.
Co-Authors Ade Khoirunnisa Al Aziz Azka Amalia Jihad Azmi, Alray Habib Badrul Munir Fakhrurrazi M. Yunus Fakhrurrazi M. Yunus Fariqan Malhusna Fatya Zahra Siahaan Hany Khairunnisa Kobat Ibrahim Adeyemi Adewumi JAMILAH Linda Linda Maila Lidinia Maryam Thahira Minny Iyasi Misran Muhadi Khalidi Muhammad Abrar Muhammad Hafid Siddiq Muslim Nabila Miswar Nada Adzkia Nazirah Sukma Nesi Alia Putri Nissa Azra Nabila Nova Rina Legsa Nur Fatin Adila Binti Idereh Nurma Yunita Nurul Afifah Ramadan, Putra Retno Arimbi Dewi Saifullah M. Yunus Saniah Amatillah Septia Nabila Siska Yani Siti Nurliyana Siti Samra Suci Naylul Muna Tajul Iflah