Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.318
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PREMISE: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal of Language Learning and Research (JOLLAR) Humanika Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat As-salam TELL - US JOURNAL ABDIMAS Iqtishadia
Hilma Safitri, Hilma
Pamulang University, Jakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The Effectiveness Of English Debate In Enhancing Eleventh Grade Of Students’ Speaking Skills Safitri, Hilma; Lisahnes Suntari
Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Vol. 10 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30605/onoma.v10i4.4777

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of English debate on the speaking skills of eleventh-grade students at SMA Yadika 10 Kosambi, Tangerang Regency. By employing a pre-experimental design with pre- and post-tests, the study utilized a quantitative approach to analyze data collected from student actions, verbal expressions, and supplementary written documents, pictures, or statistical data. The study's theoretical framework was grounded in Sibuea's (2021) theory of debate, which posits that engaging in debate fosters critical thinking, communication, and language development. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 20. Descriptive statistical analysis revealed a substantial improvement in students' speaking skills. The average pre-test score was 1.18 (standard deviation 0.39), while the average post-test score was 2.32 (standard deviation 0.55). This significant increase suggested that the debate intervention positively affected students' speaking skills. Further analysis revealed a positive correlation (r = 0.425) between pre-test and post-test scores, indicating that the observed improvement was directly attributable to the intervention. A paired samples t-test confirmed this finding, revealing a mean difference of -1.14 with a t-statistic of -23.897 (p < 0.001). This highly significant difference strongly supported the conclusion that the debate method significantly enhanced students' speaking skills in terms of grammar, vocabulary, comprehension, fluency, and pronunciation. These improvements were evident in the post-test scores, demonstrating the effectiveness of English debate in fostering holistic speaking development.
Co-Authors Akbar, Muhammad Thoriq Mulya Damayanti, Pradika Diah Intan Pratiwi Edelweis, Ananda Fajrin, Gina Zakia Falah, Barnes Adrian Ismarani, Niken Jemian, Fransiska Lisahnes Suntari Maharini, May Triranto Nikomang Ariani Nur Amalia Prameswari, Anggit Tri Putri , Astari Amalia Rahmah, Vina Auliya Ramadhan, Muhammad Daniel Rosidah, Siti Latifatul Saputra, Wirdiyan Sari, Dwi Erika Veny Kurniasih Zahara Marsellina Putri