Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Legal Protection for Medical Personnel in BPJS Affiliated Hospitals Based on Law Number 17 of 2023 Gladys Haryanto; Erna Ambarwati; Lany, Arman
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Research Horizon - August 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.4.2025.705

Abstract

Technological developments and the need for better healthcare services are driving the transformation of health law in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the impact of Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health on legal protection for healthcare workers and patients. The study used a qualitative approach using literature study methods and legal document analysis. Data were collected from laws and regulations, scientific journals, and official health-related documents. The findings indicate that the law strengthens legal protection for healthcare workers by clarifying their rights and obligations, including in anesthesia services and emergency treatment. For patients, the law improves access to equitable healthcare services and ensures the confidentiality of medical records. However, implementation still faces challenges, such as a lack of public awareness and harmonization with previous regulations. This study concludes that Law No. 17 of 2023 provides a strong foundation for a more structured healthcare system, but its success depends on consistent implementation and inter-agency coordination. This study recommends increased training for healthcare workers and public outreach to support the effective implementation of this law.
Dynamics of Consumer Protection Law In the Development of the Financial Technology Industry in Indonesia Prayuti, Yuyut; Lany, Arman; Hikmah, Wilma Nurul; Puspitasari, Ammi Amanda; Novita, Novita Anggraini; Kusrini, Nita
Law and Justice Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Law and Justice
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/laj.v10i1.4804

Abstract

Perkembangan pesat teknologi finansial (fintech) telah menghadirkan layanan pinjaman dengan syarat yang lebih fleksibel dan mudah diakses dibandingkan dengan lembaga keuangan konvensional seperti bank. Namun, kemajuan ini juga menimbulkan berbagai tantangan, terutama ketika debitur mengalami kredit macet. Kreditur dalam upaya menagih utang terkadang menggunakan metode yang agresif atau bahkan melanggar hukum, termasuk pemanfaatan media sosial untuk menekan debitur, yang sering disebut sebagai persekusi digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum dari perilaku kreditur tersebut dalam pinjaman online serta menilai perlindungan yang tersedia bagi debitur berdasarkan regulasi yang ada. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan metode deskriptif, data dikumpulkan melalui studi dokumen dan analisis data sekunder. Analisis kualitatif menunjukkan bahwa sengketa sering muncul akibat klausul kontrak yang tidak jelas atau kurangnya mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa dalam perjanjian pinjaman online. Ketika upaya penyelesaian secara damai gagal, sengketa akan berlanjut ke proses litigasi. Tindakan paksaan oleh kreditur dapat melanggar Pasal 335 ayat (1) angka 1 dan Pasal 368 ayat (1) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) yang mengatur larangan persekusi dan pemerasan dengan kekerasan. Selain itu, regulasi seperti Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 menekankan prinsip transparansi, keadilan, keandalan, kerahasiaan, dan penyelesaian sengketa yang mudah diakses untuk melindungi pengguna fintech. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penegakan hukum yang lebih kuat dan klausul kontrak yang lebih jelas sangat diperlukan untuk melindungi hak konsumen serta mencegah penyalahgunaan dalam sektor pinjaman fintech.   As Wrong One form financial technology (fintech) is impact from progress technology Which offer loan with condition And provision more easy And flexible compared to with institution finance conventional like bank. If happen credit congested, party creditor Of course will try with maximum Possible demand his rights, that is repayment debt following the flowers with method whatever. Behavior a number creditor loan on line Which judge debtor with use base movement through media social can called as persecution digital. Study This is study juridical normative with use method descriptive. Collection data done with method studies document done to data secondary. Method analysis data from results study done with use method qualitative. Results study obtained information that on saar happen dispute consequence No fulfillment agreement or agreement Which There is in in clause beginning contract loan on line or If No there is effort solution dispute in in agreement so can taken effort peace. If fail brought to court.  If do action coercion, so worn Chapter 335 Paragraph (1) Number 1 Book Constitution Law Criminal (Criminal Code). And if do extortion with violence so worn Chapter 368 Paragraph (1) Criminal Code Whereas if do extortion with violence so worn Chapter 368 Paragraph (1) Criminal Code. Regulation Authority Service Finance Number 77/POJK.01/2016 about Service Borrow Borrow Money Based Technology Information Which on Chapter 29 endeavor oblige organizer  apply principle base from protection user that is transparency, treatment Which fair, reliability, confidentiality And security data, And solution dispute user in a way simple, fast, And cost affordable. As Chapter 38 POJK Number 1/POJK.07/2013 about Protection Consumer Sector Service Finance.
Legal Responsibilities of Notaries in the Era of Artificial Intelligence in Preventing Fraudulent Property Transactions Lany, Arman
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v12i2.47041

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has had a significant impact on various sectors, including notarial services, particularly in preventing fraud in property transactions. However, the emergence of this technology raises questions about the changing paradigm of notaries' legal responsibilities as public officials. This study aims to analyze the impact of AI implementation on the role and legal responsibilities of notaries, identify regulatory challenges, and formulate policy recommendations to maintain legal protection and the integrity of the notarial system in the digital era. The research approach is normative, using secondary literature analysis in the form of laws and regulations, court decisions, and other relevant literature. Qualitative methods using prescriptive, comparative, and evaluative approaches were used to examine legal norms and their application. The findings indicate that while AI supports efficiency and fraud detection, legal interpretation and responsibility remain with notaries. Regulations need to be revised to ensure the use of AI is strictly and ethically regulated. The integration of AI does not diminish the responsibilities of notaries, and regulatory updates and increased human resource capacity are needed to address technological challenges while maintaining legal certainty and justice.