Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Parole: Journal of Linguistics and Education Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama untuk Pemberdayaan PREMISE: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies) GSE-journal
Muhammad Nafi Annury, Muhammad Nafi
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
AUGMENTED REALITY (AR) VERSUS NON-AUGMENTED REALITY (NON-AR) FLASHCARDS ON ENGLISH AS FOREIGN LANGUAGE (EFL)’ WRITING SKILLS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Kamila, Lintang Shafa; Tarwiyah, Siti; Annury, Muhammad Nafi
Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics Vol 15, No 1 (2026): Premise Journal: e-ISSN 2442-482x, p-ISSN 2089-3345
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24127/pj.v15i1.14744

Abstract

Writing is the most challenging EFL skill, requiring linguistic accuracy and creativity. AR and non-AR flashcards offer different pedagogical approaches, yet no systematic comparison exists for EFL writing development. This mixed-methods systematic literature review compares both modalities' effectiveness on writing skills and motivation. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, eight studies (2021–2025) with 249 students were analyzed. Non-AR flashcards improved grammar and vocabulary through structured memorization, while AR flashcards enhanced motivation, engagement, and creativity via immersive interaction. Moderator analyses revealed AR flashcards yield greater affective-creative outcomes. Corpus imbalance (5 non-AR vs. 3 AR studies) and Indonesian-context dominance limit generalizability. The study validates Dual-Coding Theory and suggests that integrating both modalities optimizes EFL writing development, warranting further cross-contextual research.
Co-Authors Catur Kepirianto Djoko Sutrisno Efendi , Marzon Fadhillah, Sayyidatul Fridolini, Fridolini Iis Sujarwati Kamila, Lintang Shafa Ma'mun, Nadiah SITI MARIAM Siti Tarwiyah Sofyan , Dedi Yuniati, Asmi