Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

Pertanggungjawaban Wansprestasi dalam Kontrak Distribusi: Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2864 K/Pdt/2024 Bunga Rosa J. Agnesia Ambarita; Rodiatun Adawiyah; Muhammad Arif Prasetyo
SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya Volume 21, Nomor 1 (Januari 2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/supremasi.v21i1.83184

Abstract

Kontrak distribusi merupakan instrumen hukum vital dalam aktivitas ekonomi yang mengatur hubungan kontraktual antara pemasok dan distributor berdasarkan kesepakatan para pihak. Seiring dengan kompleksitas transaksi bisnis, risiko terjadinya kegagalan pemenuhan kewajiban atau wanprestasi menjadi tantangan nyata yang memerlukan kepastian penegakan hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara mendalam bentuk serta dasar pertanggungjawaban perdata akibat wanprestasi dalam kontrak distribusi melalui tinjauan yuridis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2864 K/Pdt/2024. Sengketa ini berakar dari hubungan hukum antara CV Agro Makmur Jaya selaku distributor dengan pihak pembeli yang gagal memenuhi kewajiban pembayaran transaksi pembelian barang senilai Rp1.568.887.500,00. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konstruksi pertanggungjawaban wanprestasi dalam putusan tersebut didasarkan pada terpenuhinya unsur-unsur dalam Pasal 1243 KUHPerdata, yakni adanya perikatan yang sah, kelalaian debitur, dan kerugian nyata yang diderita kreditur. Mahkamah Agung menegaskan supremasi asas pacta sunt servanda dan memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi distributor melalui penghukuman ganti rugi yang bersifat materiil. Putusan ini memberikan implikasi penting bagi praktisi hukum dan pelaku usaha untuk menyusun klausul kontrak distribusi secara lebih rigid dan preventif guna memitigasi risiko hukum di masa depan. Melalui putusan ini, pengadilan memperkuat kepastian hukum dalam ekosistem distribusi di Indonesia.
Criminal Accountability of Perpetrators of Child Molestation Supreme Court Decision Number 1041/K/Pid.Sus/2020 Muhammad Arif Prasetyo; Rodiatun Adawiyah; Widodo Ramadhana; Hebri Gokman Lumbantungkup
LAW & PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): August
Publisher : PT. Multidisciplinary Press Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/lawpass.v1i3.31

Abstract

The crime of molestation is a form of crime against decency, where criminal acts and criminality can be committed by anyone, whether parents, adults, teenagers and children, either directly or indirectly. However, children are very vulnerable to physical or sexual violence because they are powerless creatures who depend on the people who are present in their lives to be able to keep them alive in the world safely. The purpose of this study is to find out how the criminal liability of perpetrators of child molestation and to find out how the legal considerations of judges in handling criminal cases in accordance with the Supreme Court Decision Number 1041 / K / Pid.Sus/2020. The author uses the Normative Legal research method with a Normative Juridical approach. The source of legal material used consists of primary legal material, secondary legal material, and tertiary legal material. In this study, the authors used data collection techniques in the form of literature studies (library search). Data analysis techniques use qualitative data analysis to find out and explore certain phenomena. In this study, the authors examined the Crime of Child Molestation under the age of the defendant Syarifuddin bin Alm, Tayat at the Level of Justice of the Seluma District Prosecutor's Office sentenced the perpetrator to imprisonment, fines and was proven guilty and convincing of the accused crime of molestation based on witness testimony, instructions, evidence, and defendant's statement.
Criminal Responsibility in the Corruption Case of Bumdes Lentong Village, Baharu District, Aceh Singkil Regency: (Analysis of Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022) Eunike Enintha Pandia; Tata Reiforman Waruwu; Agus Armaini; Rodiatun Adawiyah
LAW & PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): December
Publisher : PT. Multidisciplinary Press Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/lawpass.v2i5.33

Abstract

Every act must have the courage to carry out responsibility, the defendant who commits a criminal act of corruption must be given a prison sentence based on Article 2 of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes. Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022, concerning the Corruption case committed by 2 (two) village officials from Lentong Village, Baharu District, Aceh Singkil Regency who committed corruption against BUMDes amounting to IDR 332,400,000 (three hundred and thirtytwo million four hundred thousand rupiah). This thesis is entitled: Criminal Responsibility in the Bumdes Corruption Case in Lentong Village, Baharu District, Aceh Singkil Regency (Analysis of Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022). The formulation of the problem is how the law protects defendants of criminal acts of corruption and how the Supreme Court Judge considers it in the case of Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022.
Juridical Review of Investment Legal Protection in Guarantee Debt Disputes and Its Implications for Strategic Investment Policy (Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 2511 K/Pdt/2025) Hauralia Ataya Putri; Aida Ardini; Rodiatun Adawiyah; Muhammad Arif Promises
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Reusam Vol 14 No 1 (2026): REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum - Mei 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal protection of investors in debt-collateral disputes, examine the legal considerations of judges in assessing the validity and binding force of agreements, and identify the implications of decisions on strategic investment policies in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative approach and a case approach, especially through the analysis of the Supreme Court Decision Number 2511 K/Pdt/2025. The results of the study show that legal protection for investors in debt-collateral disputes is still dominated by the principle of legal certainty through the application of the principle of pacta sunt servanda. The judge considered that the debt settlement agreement that had met the legal requirements was still binding on the parties, including the new management, despite the change in the company's structure. The judge's legal considerations also emphasized that corporate responsibility remains attached to the legal entity, so that the company's obligations are not erased due to the change of management. The implications of this ruling show that although legal certainty is guaranteed, protection for investors is still not optimal, especially in the context of corporate takeovers. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations and apply the principle of prudence in investment activities to create a balance between legal certainty and investor protection.
Legal Protection for Cooperatives Whose Customers Commit Breach of Contract: Study of Decision Number 293/Pdt.G/2021/PN MDN Titania Melinda Safira; Rodiatun Adawiyah
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1095

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal considerations taken by judges in cases of breach of contract (default) by customers against cooperatives, based on Decision Number 293/Pdt.G/2021/PN Mdn, and to identify appropriate legal measures that can be pursued by cooperatives in resolving such cases. The research employs a normative legal method with a case study approach. Data were collected through a literature review and analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings reveal that the judge's considerations are influenced by several factors, including the terms of the contractual agreement, the supporting evidence submitted by the parties, and the contextual impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. In dealing with cases of default, cooperatives may adopt persuasive measures and engage in alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. This study contributes theoretically to the field of legal studies, particularly in understanding judicial reasoning in civil cases, and provides practical insights for cooperatives in managing contractual disputes effectively.
Settlement of Consumer Disputes According to Law Number 8 of 1999 Reviewed Based on Business Competition Law Anita Felicia Smith; Rodiatun Adawiyah; Ivana Ivana; Agus Armaini
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1096

Abstract

The Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) holds the authority to resolve consumer disputes through non-litigious means in accordance with Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and its implementing regulations. The operational framework of BPSK is explicitly governed by the Minister of Industry and Trade Decree Number 350/MPP/Kep/12/2001. This study aims to analyze the authority and procedures employed by BPSK in resolving consumer disputes, with a particular focus on the BPSK Lubuklinggau City Decision Number: 002/P.Arbitrase/Bpsk-Llg/IV/2021. Employing a normative juridical research approach, this study reviews relevant literature on Consumer Protection Law and Electricity Law. The findings indicate that the authority and resolution process of BPSK require two essential elements: the existence of consumer losses and that such losses arise from the consumption of goods or services provided by business actors. Furthermore, the Lubuklinggau City BPSK Decision Number: 002/P.Arbitrase/Bpsk-Llg/IV/2021 is found to contain formal deficiencies. It is recommended that revisions and harmonization of Law Number 8 of 1999 and other related regulations be undertaken to enhance legal clarity and effectiveness.
Legal Analysis of Article 3 Paragraph (1) and Article 2 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 20 of 2001 Concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption: A Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 1481 K/Pid.Sus/2018 Syahnisura E Tuahta Sitepu; Rodiatun Adawiyah; Deraldo Natalino Ginting
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1099

Abstract

This resea.rch a.na.lyzes the a.pplica.tion of A.rticle 3 Pa.ra.gra.ph 1 a.nd A.rticle 2 Pa.ra.gra.ph 1 of La.w Number 20 Yea.r 2001 concerning the A.mendment to La.w Number 31 Yea.r 1999 concerning the Era.dica.tion of Corruption, pa.rticula.rly through a. ca.se study of the Supreme Court Decision Number 1481 K/Pid.Sus/2018. The study a.ims to delve into judicia.l considera.tions in deciding corruption ca.ses a.nd contribute to the development of concepts a.nd theories of justice in Indonesia.n crimina.l la.w. The method used is a. norma.tive juridica.l a.pproa.ch with descriptive- a.na.lytica.l methods. The findings of this resea.rch indica.te tha.t the Supreme Court's decision is in a.ccorda.nce with existing provisions, unlike the decisions of the District Court a.nd High Court which were not ba.sed on clea.r lega.l provisions, na.mely A.rticle 12 letter e combined with A.rticle 12 A. Pa.ra.gra.ph (2) of La.w Number 31 Yea.r 1999 Jo La.w Number 20 Yea.r 2001 concerning the Era.dica.tion of Corruption, which stipula.tes a. minimum imprisonment of 4 (four) yea.rs a.nd a. ma.ximum of 20 (twenty) yea.rs. This discrepa.ncy ha.s rendered the District Court a.nd High Court decisions inconsistent with a.pplica.ble la.w
Legal Review of the Validity of a Power of Attorney to Sell as an Executorial Guarantee in a Breach of Performance Case : Case Study of Batang District Court Number 64/Pdt.G.S/2022/PN.Btg Edward Edward; Rodiatun Adawiyah
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i2.1170

Abstract

The power of attorney to sell is frequently employed as an alternative form of security in debt agreements outside of formal collateral mechanisms. Nonetheless, in practical application, such powers of attorney are often misused and treated as executorial guarantees, leading to legal complications when execution is attempted. This study seeks to assess the legal validity of a power of attorney to sell when used as an executorial guarantee in cases of default, and to evaluate the legal reasoning employed by the judges of the Batang District Court in Decision Number 64/Pdt.G.S/2022/PN.Btg. A normative juridical method was utilized, incorporating a statutory and case-based approach. Data were collected through literature reviews and judicial decision analyses and were examined using qualitative methods. The findings demonstrate that a power of attorney to sell cannot be equated with executorial collateral instruments such as mortgage or fiduciary security, as this contravenes the foundational principles of collateral law in Indonesia. The Batang District Court adjudicated that the said power of attorney lacked executorial force and thus required a civil lawsuit mechanism to execute the sale of the collateral. This judgment aligns with the principles of legal prudence and debtor protection, preventing potential abuse of legal authority. Accordingly, the use of a power of attorney to sell must be contextualized within its proper legal function and should not be construed as a substitute for executorial guarantees.
Application of Provisions on Restorative Justice in Criminal Acts of Domestic Violence: A Study of Decision Number 56/PID.SUS/2020/PN BDW Winson Kwekdinata; Fernando Fernando; Rodiatun Adawiyah
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i2.1282

Abstract

The resolution of criminal acts through restorative justice, as demonstrated in Decision Number 56/Pid.Sus/2020/PN BDW, provides an alternative mechanism for handling criminal cases, including complaint-based offenses. Although reconciliation was achieved between the defendant and the victim-witness, the defendant was nevertheless found guilty and sentenced to three months of imprisonment. The central issue examined in this study is whether the application of restorative justice in domestic violence cases aligns with Law Number 23 of 2004 and whether the judicial decision is consistent with prevailing legal standards. This research employs a normative and descriptive-analytical approach based on secondary data. The findings indicate that the application of restorative justice in this case adheres to the procedures outlined in the Decree of the Director General of the General Courts No. 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020. Despite reconciliation and the withdrawal of the complaint, such actions do not eliminate the defendant’s criminal liability. Although the court ruled that the defendant was not required to serve the prison sentence, the researchers argue that reconciliation achieved through restorative justice should not merely serve as a mitigating factor but should instead form the legal basis for exemption from punishment. Moreover, the regulatory framework for resolving domestic violence cases through restorative justice should be developed in greater detail. When a domestic violence case fails to meet the formal requirements for restorative justice, the conventional criminal justice process should apply.