Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Pertanggungjawaban Wansprestasi dalam Kontrak Distribusi: Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2864 K/Pdt/2024 Bunga Rosa J. Agnesia Ambarita; Rodiatun Adawiyah; Muhammad Arif Prasetyo
SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya Volume 21, Nomor 1 (Januari 2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/supremasi.v21i1.83184

Abstract

Kontrak distribusi merupakan instrumen hukum vital dalam aktivitas ekonomi yang mengatur hubungan kontraktual antara pemasok dan distributor berdasarkan kesepakatan para pihak. Seiring dengan kompleksitas transaksi bisnis, risiko terjadinya kegagalan pemenuhan kewajiban atau wanprestasi menjadi tantangan nyata yang memerlukan kepastian penegakan hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara mendalam bentuk serta dasar pertanggungjawaban perdata akibat wanprestasi dalam kontrak distribusi melalui tinjauan yuridis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2864 K/Pdt/2024. Sengketa ini berakar dari hubungan hukum antara CV Agro Makmur Jaya selaku distributor dengan pihak pembeli yang gagal memenuhi kewajiban pembayaran transaksi pembelian barang senilai Rp1.568.887.500,00. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konstruksi pertanggungjawaban wanprestasi dalam putusan tersebut didasarkan pada terpenuhinya unsur-unsur dalam Pasal 1243 KUHPerdata, yakni adanya perikatan yang sah, kelalaian debitur, dan kerugian nyata yang diderita kreditur. Mahkamah Agung menegaskan supremasi asas pacta sunt servanda dan memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi distributor melalui penghukuman ganti rugi yang bersifat materiil. Putusan ini memberikan implikasi penting bagi praktisi hukum dan pelaku usaha untuk menyusun klausul kontrak distribusi secara lebih rigid dan preventif guna memitigasi risiko hukum di masa depan. Melalui putusan ini, pengadilan memperkuat kepastian hukum dalam ekosistem distribusi di Indonesia.
Criminal Accountability of Perpetrators of Child Molestation Supreme Court Decision Number 1041/K/Pid.Sus/2020 Muhammad Arif Prasetyo; Rodiatun Adawiyah; Widodo Ramadhana; Hebri Gokman Lumbantungkup
LAW & PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): August
Publisher : PT. Multidisciplinary Press Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/lawpass.v1i3.31

Abstract

The crime of molestation is a form of crime against decency, where criminal acts and criminality can be committed by anyone, whether parents, adults, teenagers and children, either directly or indirectly. However, children are very vulnerable to physical or sexual violence because they are powerless creatures who depend on the people who are present in their lives to be able to keep them alive in the world safely. The purpose of this study is to find out how the criminal liability of perpetrators of child molestation and to find out how the legal considerations of judges in handling criminal cases in accordance with the Supreme Court Decision Number 1041 / K / Pid.Sus/2020. The author uses the Normative Legal research method with a Normative Juridical approach. The source of legal material used consists of primary legal material, secondary legal material, and tertiary legal material. In this study, the authors used data collection techniques in the form of literature studies (library search). Data analysis techniques use qualitative data analysis to find out and explore certain phenomena. In this study, the authors examined the Crime of Child Molestation under the age of the defendant Syarifuddin bin Alm, Tayat at the Level of Justice of the Seluma District Prosecutor's Office sentenced the perpetrator to imprisonment, fines and was proven guilty and convincing of the accused crime of molestation based on witness testimony, instructions, evidence, and defendant's statement.
Criminal Responsibility in the Corruption Case of Bumdes Lentong Village, Baharu District, Aceh Singkil Regency: (Analysis of Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022) Eunike Enintha Pandia; Tata Reiforman Waruwu; Agus Armaini; Rodiatun Adawiyah
LAW & PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): December
Publisher : PT. Multidisciplinary Press Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/lawpass.v2i5.33

Abstract

Every act must have the courage to carry out responsibility, the defendant who commits a criminal act of corruption must be given a prison sentence based on Article 2 of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes. Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022, concerning the Corruption case committed by 2 (two) village officials from Lentong Village, Baharu District, Aceh Singkil Regency who committed corruption against BUMDes amounting to IDR 332,400,000 (three hundred and thirtytwo million four hundred thousand rupiah). This thesis is entitled: Criminal Responsibility in the Bumdes Corruption Case in Lentong Village, Baharu District, Aceh Singkil Regency (Analysis of Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022). The formulation of the problem is how the law protects defendants of criminal acts of corruption and how the Supreme Court Judge considers it in the case of Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022.
Juridical Review of Investment Legal Protection in Guarantee Debt Disputes and Its Implications for Strategic Investment Policy (Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 2511 K/Pdt/2025) Hauralia Ataya Putri; Aida Ardini; Rodiatun Adawiyah; Muhammad Arif Promises
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Reusam Vol 14 No 1 (2026): REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum - Mei 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal protection of investors in debt-collateral disputes, examine the legal considerations of judges in assessing the validity and binding force of agreements, and identify the implications of decisions on strategic investment policies in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative approach and a case approach, especially through the analysis of the Supreme Court Decision Number 2511 K/Pdt/2025. The results of the study show that legal protection for investors in debt-collateral disputes is still dominated by the principle of legal certainty through the application of the principle of pacta sunt servanda. The judge considered that the debt settlement agreement that had met the legal requirements was still binding on the parties, including the new management, despite the change in the company's structure. The judge's legal considerations also emphasized that corporate responsibility remains attached to the legal entity, so that the company's obligations are not erased due to the change of management. The implications of this ruling show that although legal certainty is guaranteed, protection for investors is still not optimal, especially in the context of corporate takeovers. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations and apply the principle of prudence in investment activities to create a balance between legal certainty and investor protection.