Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Reni Dwi Puspitasari

UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung

Author-ID : 599821

Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

1

KONTRADIKSI YURISPRUDENSI KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH Puspitasari, Reni Dwi
Dinamika Penelitian: Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Vol 16, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/dinamika.2016.16.1.175-204

Contradictions Religious Court jurisprudence absolute competence in resolving disputes sticking Islamic banking since the advent of Law No. 21 of 2008 which includes choice of forum for dispute resolution litigation Islamic economy. This triggers legal uncertainty morning the parties. This contradiction is related to the question of the substantive law and procedural law as well as the politics of government laws as proposer is still influenced by the paradigm of colonial law and New Order. In fact, the legal political government is the policy of the law (legal policy) to be implemented at the national, among others, is in the development of laws that core law-making and reform of legal materials that are considered not relevant or appropriate to the needs of the creation of the law. Thus, the government proposal was passed that has hurt the national consensus, because article 55 (2) of Law No. 21 Year 2008 opened the space to settling disputes resolved under the laws of the colonial Dutch government that no longer fit with the culture of Indonesian culture. In addition, the government proposal was passed it was too much to interfere with the judicial realm, for the settlement of Islamic economy had previously been given to the Religious Courts by Law No. 3 of 2006.Keywords: Jurisprudence, Absolut, Islamic Banking

KONTRADIKSI YURISPRUDENSI KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH Reni Dwi Puspitasari
Dinamika Penelitian: Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Vol 16 No 1 (2016)
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/dinamika.2016.16.1.175-204

Contradictions Religious Court jurisprudence absolute competence in resolving disputes sticking Islamic banking since the advent of Law No. 21 of 2008 which includes choice of forum for dispute resolution litigation Islamic economy. This triggers legal uncertainty morning the parties. This contradiction is related to the question of the substantive law and procedural law as well as the politics of government laws as proposer is still influenced by the paradigm of colonial law and New Order. In fact, the legal political government is the policy of the law (legal policy) to be implemented at the national, among others, is in the development of laws that core law-making and reform of legal materials that are considered not relevant or appropriate to the needs of the creation of the law. Thus, the government proposal was passed that has hurt the national consensus, because article 55 (2) of Law No. 21 Year 2008 opened the space to settling disputes resolved under the laws of the colonial Dutch government that no longer fit with the culture of Indonesian culture. In addition, the government proposal was passed it was too much to interfere with the judicial realm, for the settlement of Islamic economy had previously been given to the Religious Courts by Law No. 3 of 2006.Keywords: Jurisprudence, Absolut, Islamic Banking

Title Search

Found 2 Documents Search Journal : Dinamika

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Dinamika