Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.655
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Geography Jurnal Pariwisata Pesona Jurnal Kawistara : Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Komunikasi Channel : Jurnal Komunikasi Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik ProTVF ETTISAL Journal of Communication Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Sahafa Journal of Islamic Communication Jurnal Profetik Jurnal Pariwisata Terapan Jurnal Riset Komunikasi Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi Populika International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL) ABDIMAS Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Prosperity: Journal of Society and Empowerment Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA) KALBISIANA Jurnal Sains, Bisnis dan Teknologi Jurnal Kawistara Komunikatif : Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi
Tangguh Okta Wibowo
Faculty Of Communication Science, Universitas Multimedia Nusantara
Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : ETTISAL Journal of Communication

 1 
Resepsi Komunitas Peduliodgj.id Mengenai Konten Video Stop Sebut “Orang Gila”, ODGJ Juga Manusia! Amelia Haerunisa; Tangguh Okta Wibowo
ETTISAL : Journal of Communication Vol 7, No 1 (2022): ETTISAL: Journal of Communication
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor collaboration with ISKI (Ikatan Sarjana Ilmu Komunikasi Indo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/ejoc.v7i1.7726

Abstract

AbstrakOrang dengan gangguan Jiwa (ODGJ) merupakan salah satu golongan yang masih dipandang “berbeda” untuk dapat diterima di lingkungan keluarga dan masyarakat. Hal ini dikarenakan masyarakat belum teredukasi dengan baik tentang pemahaman ODGJ. Untuk menyadarkan pentingnya peduli terhadap ODGJ maka media perlu mengangkat isu tentang ODGJ, seperti konten video Stop Sebut “Orang Gila”, ODGJ Juga Manusia! di sebuah kanal YouTube. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui resepsi komunitas Peduliodgj.id mengenai isi video tersebut. Studi ini menggunakan teori resepsi khalayak dari Stuart Hall untuk melihat fenomena tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah wawancara mendalam terhadap enam informan dari komunitas Peduliodgj.id. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adanya perbedaan posisi dari setiap informan mengenai pemaknaan ODGJ dalam konten video tersebut. Posisi yang didominasi hegemoni-dominan pada pemahaman bahwa penyebutan orang “gila” berdampak buruk untuk ODGJ, posisi negosiasi lebih pada pemahaman bahwa gangguan jiwa dan gangguan fisik harus diperlakukan dengan sama, dan terakhir, posisi oposisi lebih pada pemahaman bahwa seseorang yang pergi ke psikolog masih dipandang aneh.AbstractPeople with mental disorders (ODGJ) are one of the groups that are still considered strange to be accepted in the family and community because the community has not been properly educated about understanding ODGJ. To realize the importance of caring for ODGJ, the media must raise issues about ODGJ, such as video content Stop Sebut “Orang Gila”, ODGJ Juga Manusia! . This study aims to determine the reception of the Peduliodgj.id Community regarding Video Content Stop Sebut “Orang Gila”, ODGJ Juga Manusia! . This study uses the encoding-decoding theory by Stuart Hall. The paradigm used is constructivism with a descriptive qualitative approach. The research method used is reception analysis. The results of the study indicate that there are differences in the position of each informant regarding the meaning of ODGJ in that video. Positions that are dominated by hegemony are dominant in the discussion of the mention of crazy people having a bad impact on ODGJ. Positions that are dominated by negotiations on the discussion of mental disorders and physical disorders must be treated equally. Opposition-dominated positions on discussing someone who goes to a psychiatrist and psychologist are still in a strange field.  
The Social Construction of Technology for the Use of CHATGPT in Indonesia Wibowo, Tangguh Okta
ETTISAL : Journal of Communication Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): ETTISAL : Journal of Communication
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor collaboration with ISKI (Ikatan Sarjana Ilmu Komunikasi Indo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/ejoc.v9i1.11479

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to map the vulnerable issue about ChatGPT in academic field. This study seeks to understand the role of online media channels in mediating the understanding behind the use of ChatGPT in Indonesia. This is because the media also constructs how new technology is used, so that the use of technology is not neutral or taken for granted according to what users want. Thus, mapping the information constructed by the media is important to locate in the context of the use of ChatGPT in Indonesia. The main research question of this paper is how does the media construct the discourse related to how ChatGPT should be used? This study tries to fill the knowledge gap over the use of ChatGPT through the social construction of technology (SCOT) approach. This study uses literature review as a method to understand the discourse about the use of ChatGPT through the existence of "relevant social groups". The result shows that online media channels not only act as producers of information, but also act as groups that construct a discourse behind the presence of ChatGPT. This study expands by analyzing the reporting or production of information about ChatGPT through online media channels in Indonesia by identifying three main themes namely context, navigation, and imagination. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the use of ChatGPT constructs a discourse that triggers concerns regarding its misuse as misleading technology if there is no regulation surrounding it. Therefore, strict laws, regulations, and supervision need to be implemented to ensure the optimal use of ChatGPT and in accordance with the desired goals in related fields.
Co-Authors Alvin, Silvanus Amelia Haerunisa Andiani Fitri Febrina Andiani Fitri Febrina Bruce Dame Laoera Chelsea Roxanne Chelsea Roxanne Ramadhane Daeng Mohammad Danu Wibisono Daniel Susilo Elmada, Maria Advenita Gita Frisca Mardinsah Gabriella Christie Kartadibrata Gabriella Christie Kartadibrata Heppy New Year Haloho Juan Prince Adeliant Juan Prince Adeliant Magaretha Indriani Mohammad Azis Fadhlul Rahman Muhammad Arga Pramudya Muhammad Rusli Mujiono Mujiono Nadia Fitriana New Year Haloho, Heppy Parlindungan, Davis Roganda Putranto, Teguh Dwi Putri, Maharani Andjani Ratna Noviani Satya Candrasari Sekarini, Anggita Galuh Syafiyah Nabilla Susanto Syafuddin, Khairul Wening Udasmoro Yudha Wirawanda Yul Rachmawati Yulianti Dwi Cahyani