Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Edulitics (Education, Literature, and Linguistics) Journal Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE
Jumino Suhadi
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
HEGEMONY IN HAMKA’S NOVEL TENGGELAMNYA KAPAL VAN DER WIJCK M. Manugeren; Puja Priandana; Jumino Suhadi
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE Vol 5, No 1: May 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/jol.v5i1.6934

Abstract

The research discusses the issue of hegemony in Hamka’s novel Tenggelamnya Kapal Van Der Wijck. The work is apparently coded with custom system in its society and can be seen as a reflection of social reality. The novel explores the custom system in Minangkabau society and reveals that nearly every member of the society is bound by the existing cultural norms. From one side, the cultural system gives a good guideline for the people; but on the other side, the hegemony within the cultural systems brings the people into rigidity. No one is brave enough to stand against the hegemony of the existing norms. The research focuses solely on the form of hegemony practices done by the elders in Minangkabau culture. This research is done by descriptive qualitative method through literary sociological approach by using the theory of power of hegemony proposed by Antonio Gramsci. The data are obtained by using reading and noting technique. The data source is the novel Tenggelamnya Kapal Van Der Wijck by Hamka. The results of the research consist of two points; (1) hegemony in the form of ideology namely authoritarianism. (2) hegemony in the forms of culture namely kinship system and social stratification in Minangkabau.
STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN USING CONDITIONAL SENTENCES Syafrizal Azzali; Jumino Suhadi; Purwarno Purwarno
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE Vol 5, No 2: November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/jol.v5i2.7587

Abstract

This research was aimed at describing the students’ ability using conditional sentences and to investigate the dominant type of conditional sentences mastered by the eleventh-grade students using conditional sentences (type I, II, and III) at SMAS Istiqlal Delitua Academic Year 2022/2023. The design of this research was descriptive quantitative research and the instrument used in this research was an objective test or multiple choices. The population of this research was 210 students. Then, the researchers used a simple random sampling technique to take the sample and chose 30 students. The researchers found out: first, the mean score of students’ ability in using conditional sentences was 77.86; it was categorized as a “good” level; second, the dominant type of students’ ability in using conditional sentences was “type I” with a mean score of 0.88 or 38%. It means the process of teaching and learning English, more specifically, in Conditional Sentences, at SMAS Istiqlal Delitua Academic Year 2022/2023 has reached the standard.
Aceh as The Role Model of Democratic Management Success: Critical Discourses Analysis Chairuddin Chairuddin; M Manugeren; Jumino Suhadi
Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30605/onoma.v11i1.5059

Abstract

This study analyzes the news narrative “Aceh Tak Masuk Daerah Rawan Pilkada Serentak, Lima Provinsi Memiliki Potensi Tinggi” using Van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) model to explore Aceh’s portrayal as a role model of democratic success. The research aims to uncover how this narrative influences perceptions of Aceh’s stability among local and national audiences, particularly in contrast to its historical association with conflict. This study adopts a qualitative approach, employing Van Dijk’s CDA framework, which consists of three dimensions: textual analysis, social cognition, and sociopolitical context. The data were collected through a textual analysis of media discourse and audience surveys involving 47 respondents (37 from Aceh and 10 from outside Aceh). The textual analysis focuses on the structural composition of the news, while the audience survey examines how different groups perceive the narrative. The results indicate that 72.73% of local respondents express pride in Aceh’s depiction as a safe and stable region, yet 43.24% remain neutral about its relevance to current realities. Among national respondents, 100% perceive the narrative positively, with 50% strongly agreeing that Aceh serves as a model for democratic management. These findings demonstrate that media discourse effectively challenges stereotypes and promotes a positive image of Aceh, particularly to national audiences. However, local acceptance requires narratives grounded in authentic experiences. This study contributes to discourse analysis by showing how positive discourse can transform public perception, highlighting its potential to promote post-conflict regions as examples of democratic success.
Power and Ideology in Online News: A Sociology-Cognitive Critical Discourse Analysis of Misty Copeland’s Representation in CNN Ratna Dewi; Jumino Suhadi; Devi Pratiwy
Edulitics (Education, Literature, and Linguistics) Journal Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): July - December 2025
Publisher : Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan*

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/edulitics.v10i2.11232

Abstract

This study examines how power and ideology operate in CNN’s online news representation of Misty Copeland, using Teun A. van Dijk’s Socio-Cognitive Critical Discourse Analysis (SCA) framework. The research explores how linguistic choices and discursive strategies simultaneously empower and constrain the portrayal of race, gender, and success within liberal media narratives. Data were drawn from selected CNN articles covering Copeland’s achievements and analyzed through textual, cognitive, and social dimensions to reveal how language, cognition, and ideology interact in shaping media representation. The findings indicate that CNN constructs Copeland’s identity through a discourse of “contained empowerment,” which outwardly celebrates diversity while subtly reproducing liberal and post-feminist ideologies. Linguistically, terms such as “trailblazer,” “breaking barriers,” and “making history” elevate Copeland as an exceptional figure. Cognitively, these expressions activate shared mental models grounded in meritocracy, reinforcing beliefs that upward mobility stems primarily from individual effort. Ideologically, the coverage depoliticizes issues of race and gender by transforming structural inequalities into narratives of personal perseverance. The study concludes that CNN’s portrayal of Copeland naturalizes inequality through celebratory empowerment discourse. While promoting diversity, the narrative obscures institutional power and social asymmetry. This research contributes to Critical Discourse Studies by integrating socio-cognitive and intersectional perspectives, highlighting the need for critical media literacy in understanding how digital news both emancipates and regulates meaning in contemporary culture.
Family Values in The Film In Your Dreams (2025): A Discourse-Historical Approach Ayu Melati Ningsih; Jumino Suhadi; Devy Pratiwi
Edulitics (Education, Literature, and Linguistics) Journal Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): July - December 2025
Publisher : Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan*

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/edulitics.v10i2.11467

Abstract

This study examined how ideological tensions between traditional family stability and individual aspiration were discursively constructed in In Your Dreams (2025) through sibling dialogue and dream sequences. Grounded in Ruth Wodak’s Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) within Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the study focused on five core strategies: nomination, predication, argumentation, perspectivization, and intensification/mitigation. Using qualitative textual analysis of selected script excerpts, the research systematically reconstructed argumentative structures through the claim, warrant, conclusion model to identify the operation of the topos of threat and the topos of loss at the micro-linguistic level (lexical choice, modality, metaphor, and pronoun use). The findings demonstrated that family conflict was discursively framed not merely as interpersonal disagreement but as a structured moral negotiation. Nostalgic generalization and mitigation normalized conflict while simultaneously revealing epistemic insecurity, whereas modal intensification and symbolic metaphor in dream sequences amplified perceptions of instability. Through predication, parental figures were constructed as embodying competing moral orientations, sustainability versus passion, without explicit delegitimation, resulting in ideological ambiguity. The dreamscape served as an arena in which these tensions were dramatized and ultimately rearticulated into a hybrid moral resolution. This study contributes to CDA-based film analysis by demonstrating how DHA’s argumentative reconstruction can systematically expose ideological positioning in animated family narratives through explicit micro-linguistic evidence. Future research should integrate multimodal analysis and audience reception to extend the interpretive scope.
Testimonial Injustice in YouTube Comment Sections: An Epistemological Reflection on Digital Discourse Syarifah Syarifah; Jumino Suhadi; Devi Pratiwy
Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature Vol 7, No 1 (2026): Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37905/jetl.v7i1.37063

Abstract

YouTube comment sections are often treated as noisy and trivial spaces, yet they function as important arenas where people negotiate knowledge, credibility, and authority. This article examines how testimonial injustice unfolds in YouTube comment sections through everyday interactions surrounding contested knowledge claims. Drawing on social epistemology, particularly the concept of testimonial injustice, this study focuses on how speakers are believed, dismissed, or granted authority in digital discourse. Using qualitative discourse analysis, the data consist of selected comment threads responding to a viral YouTube video related to the Apollo moon landing. The comments were drawn from a dataset of 1,264 comments collected between 15 December 2025 and 1 March 2026, from which 9 comments and reply threads were purposively selected for detailed analysis. As YouTube comment sections continue to grow over time, the dataset reflects the comments available during the specified data collection period. The analysis shows four recurring epistemic patterns: credibility deficit, where testimonies are dismissed without engagement; uptake failure, where attempts to explain or correct information receive partial or no epistemic recognition; identity-based credibility judgments, where speakers are evaluated based on perceived competence rather than the content of their claims; and credibility excess, where confidence and technical tone grant undue epistemic authority. These findings suggest that YouTube comment sections are not merely spaces of misinformation or disagreement, but sites where epistemic norms are actively negotiated and often unevenly distributed. This article contributes to digital discourse studies by highlighting how testimonial injustice operates in everyday online interactions and by positioning YouTube as an epistemically consequential space rather than a marginal one.
Co-Authors Ayu Melati Ningsih Chairuddin Chairuddin Devi Pratiwy Devy Pratiwi M Manugeren M. Manugeren Puja Priandana Purwarno, Purwarno Ratna Dewi Syafrizal Azzali Syarifah Syarifah