Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : IBLAM Law Review

LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST CHILDREN ONLINE PORNOGRAPHIC CRIME OBJECTS BASED ON LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 44 OF 2008 CONCERNING PORNOGRAPHY Amsori, Amsori; Rizky Isnia, Debby
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (659.718 KB) | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v1i01.2

Abstract

The issue of legal protection for children who are the object of crime in Indonesia is very important because they are the future generation of the nation. One of the threats to children is the influence of online pornography, where the online world is now common to society. So that the public knows whether the state has made efforts to provide legal protection for children who are objects of online pornography crimes through the Pornography Law and to find out the extent to which the Pornography Law is used as a reference to get legal protection from perpetrators of online pornography crimes. In this research, it is analyzed juridically with deductive explanation regarding the provisions contained in the Law on Pornography in relation to the legal protection of children as objects of pornography crimes. It was found that since the early part of the Pornography Law has shown the spirit of legal protection for children starting from the definition of age limits categorized as children, the purpose of the law which clearly contains the words to protect children, to criminal provisions that stipulate an additional sentence of one third of the maximum a criminal threat if the pornographic crime involves a child. In decision Number 1363 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN JKT.SEL, the Pornography Law is mentioned as a reference in the ruling other than the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions, however in imprisonment and fines in the verdict it does not indicate that what was used is a criminal provision in the Pornography Law. In fact, according to the Criminal Code, if there are different rules, the heavier the criminal provisions are used. From the foregoing, it can be seen that the Pornography Law is here to answer the need for legal protection for children as objects of online pornography crimes. Then, criminal decisions related to pornography crimes should consistently refer to the Pornography Law in order to play an optimal role in preventing similar crimes from recurring and ensuring legal protection for children.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA YANG MENGAKIBATKAN LUKA BERAT (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 992 K/PID.SUS/2017) Rahmatulloh, AA; Amsori, Amsori
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i1.59

Abstract

This study aims to determine the legal protection for victims of domestic violence and to find out the judge's legal considerations in making decisions on cases of criminal acts of domestic violence that resulted in serious injuries in case Number: 992 K/Pid.sus/2017. The type of research in this thesis is Juridical Normative Law Research. Normative Legal Research is a legal research method that principally conducts research on legal rules in legislation, jurisprudence and doctrine which is carried out qualitatively. From the research conducted, the authors get the following results: First, that legal protection for victims of criminal acts of domestic violence is an effort to recover victims of domestic violence, which is an integral part of the legal process. In this case, it is a shared responsibility between the government and service providers, including medical, psychological, legal and safe house services. Second, that based on the author's analysis, the consideration of the Supreme Court Judge in case Number: 992 K/Pid.Sus/2017 contradicts the authority of the judex juris because he did not receive a cassation request from the Public Prosecutor who clearly questioned the application of the law in judex facti. So, the author should state that the Supreme Court Judge's Decision Number: 992 K/Pid.Sus/2017 does not contain a sense of justice and does not contain the principle of law enforcement.