Articles
<![CDATA[Intellectual Property Law in Bankruptcy Resolution ]]>
<![CDATA[Nainggolan, Bernard]]>
<![CDATA[ Law Development Journal Vol 3, No 4 (2021): December 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/ldj.3.4.863-874
<![CDATA[This research analysis the important role of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in the context of bankruptcy law and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang/PKPU) in Indonesia. Articles in the Civil Code, such as Article 1233, as well as bankruptcy regulations regulate obligations and protection regarding company debt. Curators and company administrators play an important role in managing bankrupt company assets, including IPR. However, optimal management of IPR is often overlooked in bankruptcy resolution efforts, which should take into consideration the peace and continuity of the company's business. This research uses sociological or socio-legal methods. This method is a type of research that focuses on empirical-quantitative observation and analysis which focuses on collecting and examining secondary data, which is then followed by direct research on primary data obtained from the field or community. This research emphasizes the need for optimal recognition and management of IPR in the bankruptcy process to maximize the value of company assets and support financial recovery.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Dynamics in the Digital Era: Navigating the Impact of Digital Transformation on Indonesian Society ]]>
<![CDATA[Nainggolan, Bernard]]>
<![CDATA[ Law Development Journal Vol 5, No 4 (2023): December 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/ldj.5.4.714-728
<![CDATA[Legal philosophy provides an important foundation in understanding the basic principles of law, such as justice, freedom and responsibility. By taking these ethical values into account, legal rules can be formulated that ensure the protection of society's rights and interests in the face of rapid technological change. Through an in-depth study of primary and secondary legal sources, this research describes legal phenomena related to digital transformation in Indonesia by utilizing primary legal materials, especially related laws, to understand the legal basis on which laws are formed in the face of digital transformation. Legal philosophy plays an important role in articulating the concept of justice in the legal system. This concept is a guide for making laws that must develop along with the development of society. In the context of digital technology development in Indonesia, the importance of progressive regulations is crucial. These regulations must provide clear guidelines for the use of digital technology to ensure that the benefits can be obtained while the negative impacts can be minimized. Thus, legal philosophy becomes an important basis in creating legal conditions that are in line with current developments. Legal philosophy brings a deep understanding of the concept of justice and how this concept should be reflected in the applicable legal system. By considering philosophical values and principles, it is hoped that the legal system can achieve nobler goals and provide protection and prosperity for the entire community.]]>
<![CDATA[Conceptualizing Intellectual Property Laws as A Bankruptcy Property (Beodel) In Indonesian Laws: A Normative Juridical Approach ]]>
<![CDATA[Nainggolan, Bernard]]>
<![CDATA[ Law Development Journal Vol 4, No 4 (2022): December 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/ldj.4.4.611-626
<![CDATA[This research examines the ramifications of bankruptcy on Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) and underscores the necessity of safeguarding asset owners' rights within the bankruptcy process. By utilizing two primary methodologies, namely the normative juridical approach and the conceptual approach, the study evaluates the legal framework governing IPRs in the context of bankruptcy. Employing a normative juridical research methodology, the study draws upon primary, secondary, and tertiary legal literature. The primary focus of this research is on the legal provisions concerning the preservation of Intellectual Property Rights amidst bankruptcy proceedings. The findings underscore the crucial role of coordination among asset owners, creditors, and the judiciary in resolving bankruptcy cases involving IPRs. Protection of these rights is paramount not only within bankruptcy contexts but also amid the broader landscape of globalization and international trade dynamics. Collaborative efforts involving governments, legal institutions, international organizations, and industry stakeholders are essential to foster growth, innovation, and uphold values of environmental sustainability and responsibility within the industry. Adequate protection of IPRs serves as a catalyst for stimulating innovation and creativity, while simultaneously ensuring environmental sustainability and promoting inclusive economic growth.]]>
<![CDATA[The Going Concern Paradigm in Bankruptcy Process Reviewed from Regulations in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Nainggolan, Bernard]]>;
<![CDATA[Anatoliy, Kostruba]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Vol 40, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Unissula ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/jh.40.1.272-284
<![CDATA[Companies often seek alternative debt resolution methods in bankruptcy to avoid liquidation or operational shutdown. One such alternative is through a settlement, where the debtor offers partial payment of the debt to creditors with the condition of being released from the remaining debt. Additionally, the suspension of debt obligations allows companies to develop a financial restructuring plan that can ensure long-term operational sustainability. Thus, the purpose of this study is important to understand how bankruptcy decisions, and debt settlement alternatives for business actors and stakeholders. This research uses a descriptive approach by analyzing relevant legislation, legal literature, and case studies to understand the mechanisms and legal implications of the bankruptcy process. The secondary data used comes from sources such as laws, court rulings, and relevant legal literature. The primary focus of this research is to analyze Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. The study results indicate that the bankruptcy process in Indonesia relies on mechanisms such as debt payment suspension, settlement, and judicial review to resolve debts and ensure business continuity. The going concern paradigm is integrated into these processes, although in a different context from the principle in civil law.]]>
<![CDATA[LEGAL PROTECTION OF CONSUMERS IN INSURANCE AGREEMENTS GENERALLY AND ESPECIALLY MARINE HULL INSURANCE AS ONE OF INDONESIA'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ]]>
<![CDATA[Simanjuntak, Marihot]]>;
<![CDATA[Tumanggor, Tumanggor]]>;
<![CDATA[Nainggolan, Bernard]]>;
<![CDATA[Widiarty, Wiwik Sri]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Vol 6, No 1.2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[STMIK Dharma Wacana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29099/ijair.v6i1.2.792
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine consumer legal protection in general insurance agreements and special marine creep insurance as one of Indonesia's economic development. This research is a mixed research method (mix method), namely normative juridical and empirical juridical. Data collection techniques Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources are among the legal materials studied and evaluated in this normative legal study. The results of the study show that legal protection for consumers in insurance agreements and practices is generally regulated in the Civil Code, the Commercial Code, Law No. 40 of 2014 concerning Insurance Business and the Consumer Protection Act which each of these rules contains related to the legal protection of insurance agreements. Legal protection for insurance customers, the insurance (guarantor) will provide compensation to the insured (customer) in accordance with the methods and conditions contained in the policy. Against losses resulting from guaranteed risks such as property losses resulting from a hazard or disaster.]]>
<![CDATA[APPLICATION OF BUSINESS CONTINUITY PROVISIONS IN BANKRUPTCY TO INCREASE THE VALUE OF BANKRUPTCY ASSETS ]]>
<![CDATA[Siburian, Hendra Harianto S.]]>;
<![CDATA[Nainggolan, Bernard]]>;
<![CDATA[Harjono, Dhaniswara K.]]>
<![CDATA[ JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i1.342
<![CDATA[APPLICATION OF BUSINESS CONTINUITY PROVISIONS (GOING CONCERN) IN BANKRUPTCY TO INCREASE THE VALUE OF BANKRUPTCY ASSETS (Decision No. 54/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Sby), the aim of this research is to determine the duties and authority of the curator in the management and/or or settlement of bankruptcy assets and to find out the application of the going concern provisions in the bankruptcy of PT. Banjar Intan Mandiri based on Decision No. 54/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Sby. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical research method with Law no. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. The results of this research are that the Curator has the authority to carry out the task of managing and/or settling all of the debtor's assets which become bankruptcy assets. This is because by law the Debtor loses his right to control and manage his assets which are included in the bankruptcy assets from the date the bankruptcy decision is declared. In carrying out its duties, the Curator is not required to obtain approval from or provide prior notification to the Debtor or any of the Debtor's organs, although in circumstances other than bankruptcy such approval or notification is required. The curator is obliged to take actions that can increase the value of the bankrupt assets. The application of business continuity provisions in bankruptcy cases is within the framework of legal protection for debtors and has a positive impact on increasing the company's economic value which in turn is used to pay debts to its creditors.]]>
<![CDATA[Asas Kepatutan dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama di Bawah Tangan Antara Artis dan Manajemen Artis Dikaitkan dengan Akta Otentik ]]>
<![CDATA[Silitonga, Timbul Tumbur]]>;
<![CDATA[Nainggolan, Bernard]]>;
<![CDATA[Martanti, Yurisa]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Riviera Publishing ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.58344/jmi.v2i1.151
<![CDATA[Perjanjian Kerja Sama Antara Artis Dengan Manajemen Artis Atau Agensi Artis. Arus Pasang Dan Surutnya Perkara-Perkara Hukum Yang Terkait Dengan Perjanjian Tersebut Kerap Terjadi, Diantaranya: Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 305/ Pdt.G/2019/Pn.Jkt.Brt., Antara Iss Manajemen Artis Melawan M. Khalil Azmi; Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 653/Pdt.G/2019/Pn Jkt.Utr., Antara A Team Managemen, Milik Karin Novilda Melawan Cindy Claudia; Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 126/Pdt.G/2019/Pn.Bgr., Antara Baim Wong Melawan Kiki Astrida; Dan Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 28/Pdt/2017/Pt.Dki., Antara Sammy Simorangkir Melawan Pt. Profesional Music, Diwakili Oleh Jeffery Djajasaputra. Dari Putusan Kasus Tersebut, Maka Dibuatlah Suatu Rumusan Masalah, Diantaranya: 1). Bagaimana Penarapan Asas Kepatutan Dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kerja Sama Antara Pihak Artis Dan Manajemen Artis Yang Dibuat Di Bawah Tangan Dikaitkan Dengan Akta Otentik? 2). Bagaimana Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Di Bawah Tangan Artis Dan Manajemen Artis? Lebih Lanjut, Permasalahan Hukum Tersebut, Dilakukan Suatu Eksaminasi Dan Dianalisis Menggunakan Asas Kepatutan Suatu Perjanjian Dan Teori Perlindungan Hukum. Karya Tulis Ini Merupakan Jenis Penelitian Hukum Yuridis Normatif Dan Pendekatannya, Diantaranya: 1). Peraturan Perundang-Undangan; 2). Pendekatan Konseptual; 3). Pendekatan Analitis; Dan 4). Pendekatan Kasus. Berdasarkan Hasil Pembahasan Hukum, Maka Dapat Diketahui Suatu Kesimpulannya: 1). Bahwa Asas Kepatutan Tidak Diterapkan Dengan Sebagaimana Mestinya Di Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Sama Antara Manajemen Artis Dengan Artis. Hal Itu Dapat Terjadi Dikarenakan Berbagai Alasan; 2) Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Artis Dalam Pembuatan Perjanjian Kerja Sama Artis Dan Manajemen Artis Dapat Dilakukan Dalam Dua Bentuk Yaitu Preventif Dan Represif]]>
<![CDATA[Pelindungan Hukum Bagi Penerjemah Terkait Dengan Penerbitan Buku Terjemahan Di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Nurhayati, Sitaresmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Yuhelson, Yuhelson]]>;
<![CDATA[Nainggolan, Bernard]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 8 (2023): Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Riviera Publishing ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.58344/jmi.v2i8.421
<![CDATA[Hak cipta sebuah karya buku terjemahan tidak saja melindungi penulis sebagai pencipta, melainkan juga pada penerjemah sebagai orang yang melakukan alih bahasa atas karya penulis. Dalam pelaksanaannya, penerjemah belum mendapat pelindungan hukum yang sesuai berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan. Tidak pernah ada klausula hak cipta penerjemah dalam kontrak merupakan salah satu bentuk pelanggaran yang terjadi. Perlunya pelindungan hukum atas hak cipta ini, agar ada pengakuan terhadap hak moral dan hak ekonomi yang akan didapat oleh pencipta dari hasil ciptaannya, sehingga dapat mencegah kerugian dari pihak yang tidak bertanggung jawab. Berdasarkan latar belakang di atas penulis mengangkat rumusan masalah tentang bagaimana pengaturan hukum dan eksistensi penerjemah buku di Indonesia dalam pemenuhan pelindungan hak cipta atas karya terjemahannya? Dan bagaimana upaya pelindungan hak cipta penerjemah buku di Indonesia berkaitan dengan karya terjemahannya? Metode penelitian menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif. dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan cara wawancara dan studi kepustakaan, sedangkan analisis bahan hukum dilakukan dengan cara melakukan penafsiran hukum (interpretasi) yaitu penafsiran sistematis dan teleologis. Hasil penelitian pertama, Dalam peraturan perundang-undangan seperti Konvensi Bern dan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta telah mengakui karya terjemahan sebagai karya yang dilindungi hak cipta, yang merupakan karya turunan (derivative works). Meskipun tidak disebutkan secara eksplisit, penerjemah sebagai pencipta karya terjemahan mendapat pelindungan berupa hak moral dan hak ekonomi, tapi kedudukannya tidak sama dengan pencipta karya aslinya karena karya penerjemah merupakan karya turunan. Kedua, dalam peraturan perundang-undangan maupun dalam praktik penerbitan karya terjemahan karya penerjemah buku, penerjemah belum mendapat pelindungan hukum dan kepastian hukum. Tidak ada ketentuan tegas berapa hak ekonomi yang adil bagi penerjemah dan mekanisme pemberian hak ekonomi yang pasti.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Hak Atas Penggunaan Merek yang Berakhir dengan Penetapan Merek di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Pangalila, Denny]]>;
<![CDATA[Nainggolan, Bernard]]>;
<![CDATA[Panjaitan, Hulman]]>
<![CDATA[ Action Research Literate Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024): Action Research Literate ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ridwan Institute ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46799/arl.v8i7.435
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini membahas perlindungan hukum terhadap penggunaan merek dan penetapan hak merek di Indonesia, dengan fokus pada studi kasus "Ayam Geprek Bensu". Tujuannya adalah untuk menganalisis penerapan fungsi merek menurut hukum positif Indonesia dan tantangan perlindungan hukum terkait perbedaan putusan antara Mahkamah Agung dan Menteri Hukum dan HAM dalam kasus tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan mengutamakan analisis substansi peraturan perundang-undangan, buku, jurnal, makalah, dan yurisprudensi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kompleksitas dalam penegakan hukum merek di Indonesia, mempertegas perlunya konsistensi interpretasi hukum untuk memastikan keadilan dan kepastian hukum bagi semua pihak terkait.]]>
<![CDATA[Efektivitas Pemberesan Boedel Pailit Oleh Kurator dan Perlindungan Hak Terhadap Kreditur Separatis Bank ]]>
<![CDATA[Sinaga, Comodor Erfisen]]>;
<![CDATA[Nainggolan, Bernard]]>;
<![CDATA[Widiarty, Wiwik Sri]]>
<![CDATA[ Action Research Literate Vol. 8 No. 11 (2024): Action Research Literate ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ridwan Institute ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46799/arl.v8i11.2351
<![CDATA[Ekonomi Indonesia telah menunjukkan tren positif dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Namun, masih terdapat berbagai tantangan yang dihadapi, seperti tingginya tingkat kemiskinan, kesenjangan pendapatan, dan pengangguran. Metode pendekatan yang akan penulis gunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode pendekatan secara yuridis normatif. Pendekatan Perundang – undangan (statute approach), Pendekatan Kasus (case approach), dan Pendekatan Konseptual (conceptual approach). Bahwa dengan disahkannya Undang-undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang telah terdapat adanya kepastian hukum mengenai pengertian kreditur. Bahwa apabila kita baca terkait dengan penjelasan Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Undang-undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Bahwa dalam perkara Perkara Pailit Putusan Nomor 12/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2015/PN Niaga Smg tertanggal 22 Oktober 2015 pada pokoknya Kurator PT. Mitra Sentosa Plastik Industri (Dalam Pailit) telah efektif melakukan penilaian harta pailit debitur PT. Mitra Sentrosa Plastik (Dalam Pailit) selaku debitur pailit, dan telah efektif dalam melaksanakan dan/atau melakukan pemberesan harta pailit PT. Mitra Sentosa Plastik Industri (Dalam Pailit)]]>
