Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.615
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Verstek Priviet Social Sciences Journal Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies
Bambang Santoso
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN BEBAS TERDAKWA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 799/PID.B/2021/PN JAMBI) Muhammad Dedy; Bambang Santoso
Verstek Vol 9, No 4 (2021): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72440

Abstract

This article aims to examine and find out the suitability of the considerations of the judge who handed down an acquittal in a fraud crime case with article 183 in conjunction with article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This article uses normative or doctrinal legal methods that are prescriptive and applied. The approach used in this article is a case approach. The use of legal materials includes primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials uses library research by collecting legal materials related to the problem to be studied. The law material analysis technique used is the syllogism method which uses a deductive mindset. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it shows that in Decision Number 799/Pid.B/2021/PN Jambi, the considerations of judges who handed down acquittals in cases of fraud were in accordance with Article 183 in conjunction with Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This is because the Prosecutor's evidence is still very minimal through the evidence of witnesses and letters to find material truth in this case. In addition, based on the results of the examination at trial the Judge was of the opinion that the second and third elements of Article 378 of the Criminal Code in the Public Prosecutor's indictment were not legally fulfilled so that the Judge handed down an acquittal against the Defendant.Keyword: Judge's Consideration; Evidence; Acquittal Verdict; Fraud
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN DALAM PERKARA KORUPSI PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 51/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Jkt Pst Laurencia Dian Flaviana Agatha; Bambang Santoso
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.97865

Abstract

This study aims to assess the appropriateness of using expert testimony as evidence in the proving corruption  cases,  specifically  in  verdict  Number  51/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN  Jkt.  Pst.  This  research  is normative legal research and it is prescriptive in nature, with legal sources obtained from primary and secondary legal resources. The technique of collecting legal in this research is by means of literature study and legal materials are obtained and processed using the deductive syllogism method. The author analyzes Articles 2 and 3 of the Law on the Against of Corruption Crime as the major premise, with Verdict Number 51/Pid.SusTPK/2024/PN Jkt. Pst. as the minor premise.The results showed that the judge's considerations in imposing a criminal sentence are consistent with Article 183 of KUHAP. In their legal reasoning, the panel of judges based their decision on the evidence and exhibits  presented,  which  convinced  them,  coupled  with  the  absence  of  any  findings  of  the  criminal irresponsibility.  
KESESUAIAN PENERAPAN PUTUSAN BEBAS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DENGAN DASAR PEMBELAAN TERPAKSA MENURUT KUHAP Edwina Prabamawarni; Bambang Santoso
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.68775

Abstract

This article analyzes the criminal procedural law related to the application of acquittals in violent crimes on the basis of forced defense in the provisions of the KUHAP. The Panel of Judges set an acquittal in this case because the Panel of Judges was not sure of the crime committed by the defendant. The purpose of this article is to prove whether the decision of the Pati District Court Number 173/Pid.B/2019/Pn Pti is in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code. The research method used isdoctrinal or normative legal research. This research is prescriptive and applied. The method of collecting legal materials is by means of literature study and the legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the research and discussion to answer the problem, it can be concluded that the Panel of Judges in establishing an acquittal in the case of the crime of violence against people in the decision of the Pati District Court Number 173/Pid.B/2019/PN Pti complies with the provisions of Article 183 of the KUHAP because the terms of the decision must fulfill the conviction of the judge as stated in the article.Keywords : Free Verdict; Violent Crime; KUHAP
Co-Authors Afif Falady Al Rasyid Allodya Sukma Amadeus Anugrah Dharmawan Annisa Kusuma Rahmani Aprillia Ayu Anisa Azzam Zaid Muharam Chacha Feillysita Marsha Cindy Nain Pangestu Dara Pustika Sukma Dewi Azizah Nursafitri Edwina Prabamawarni Effana Risanti Fachri Nur Rizal Farkha Anisah Cahyaningrum Fauziah Yumna Halimah Annisaa Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Itok Dwi Kurniawan Kevin Athallah Lazuardi Khansa Diva Kharisma Shalsabilla Putri Nofa Lathifah Nur Azizah Laurencia Dian Flaviana Agatha Muhammad Dedy Muhammad Rustamaji Muhammad Syafiq Azhar Nabila Ayu Safitri Nasrul Alief Pratama Puspa Indah Harumi Rhevika Gurindra Hapsari Septian Joddie Dwianur Sukono Shafa Salsa Sabila Tarisa Aulia Najwa Tri Cahyono Anggoro Yaying Prabaswara