Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Al-Ikhlas Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum INJURLENS Open Access DRIVERset
Maksum
Universitas Islam Kalimantan Selatan Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
The Role Of The Constitutional Court In Testing The Presidential Threshold Law For The 2024 Presidential Election Maksum Maksum; Abdul Hamid
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 16, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v16i1.12947

Abstract

Objective study This is for know The Role of the Constitutional Court in Reviewing the Presidential Threshold Law for the 2024 Presidential Election As for the method study This is a qualitative study, and research qualitative is a research method used to understand social phenomena in depth. As for the type of research used by the researcher, i.e., studies, usage studies, because the researcher can understand in a way the deep context, process, and complexity of the phenomenon researched. The research results show that the Constitutional Court has the responsibility to ensure that the presidential threshold requirements are in accordance with the constitution and the basic principles of democracy. Controversial cases in various countries and the challenges associated with presidential threshold testing demonstrate the complexity and controversy involved in these arrangements.
ASPEK HUKUM PROSES BALIKNAMA TANPA DIKETAHUI LAGI PEMILIK ASAL DI DESA SUNGAI PINANG KECAMATAN TAMBANG ULANG KABUPATEN TANAH LAUT Maksum Maksum; Istiana Heriani; Ningrum Ambarsari
JURNAL PENGABDIAN AL-IKHLAS UNIVERSITAS ISLAM KALIMANTAN MUHAMMAD ARSYAD AL BANJARY Vol 10, No 2 (2024): AL-IKHLAS JURNAL PENGABDIAN
Publisher : Universitas Islam kalimantan MAB

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/jpaiuniska.v10i2.13651

Abstract

Sertipikat merupakan surat tanda bukti hak sebagaimana dimaksud dalam pasal 19 ayat (2) huruf c UUPA untuk hak atas tanah, hak pengelolaan, tanah wakaf, hak milik atas satuan rumah susun dan hak tanggungan yang masing-masing sudah dibukukan dalam buku tanah yang bersangkutan. Kepemilikan sertipikat menjadi bukti penguasaaan yuridis yang diikuti dengan penguasaan fisik bidang tanah. Sertipikat Hak Milik memiliki fungsi sebagai alat pembuktian kepemilikan hak atas tanah sekalipun pemegang hak tidak menguasai fisik objek hak atas tanahsecara konkret. Sementara itu, dalam suatu jual beli, dimana peralihan hak belum sempurna, pembeli dengan itikad baik harus dilindungi, meski kemudian diketahui bahwa penjual adalah orang yang tidak berhak. Pemilik asal hanya dapat mengajukan gugatan ganti rugi kepada penjual yang tidak berhak.Kata Kunci: Peralihan Hak, Sertifikat Hak Milik
The Role Of The Constitutional Court In Testing The Presidential Threshold Law For The 2024 Presidential Election Maksum Maksum; Abdul Hamid
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 16, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v16i1.12947

Abstract

Objective study This is for know The Role of the Constitutional Court in Reviewing the Presidential Threshold Law for the 2024 Presidential Election As for the method study This is a qualitative study, and research qualitative is a research method used to understand social phenomena in depth. As for the type of research used by the researcher, i.e., studies, usage studies, because the researcher can understand in a way the deep context, process, and complexity of the phenomenon researched. The research results show that the Constitutional Court has the responsibility to ensure that the presidential threshold requirements are in accordance with the constitution and the basic principles of democracy. Controversial cases in various countries and the challenges associated with presidential threshold testing demonstrate the complexity and controversy involved in these arrangements.
Legal analysis of the status and content of general election commission decision number 1774 of 2024 in the election of the mayor of Banjarbaru Muhammad Ridho Taufiq; Maksum Maksum; Abdul Hamid
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v6i1.156

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the legal position and substantive content of General Elections Commission Decision Number 1774 of 2024 within the regulatory system of regional head elections, focusing on the 2024 Banjarbaru mayoral election. This study addresses a gap in electoral law scholarship, which has primarily examined election administration and dispute resolution but has given limited attention to the legal status of General Elections Commission Decisions that contain general and continuously applicable norms. The legal issue emerged when one candidate pair was disqualified after ballot printing, yet the election was not transformed into a single-candidate election using the empty-column mechanism. Instead, the General Elections Commission applied a technical provision declaring votes for the disqualified candidate pair invalid. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The study finds that Decision Number 1774 of 2024 cannot be classified as a beschikking because it lacks individual, concrete, and final characteristics. However, it also cannot be regarded as a regulation (regeling) because its authority is not derived from legislative delegation. The decision is more appropriately positioned as a beleidsregel or technical policy rule. Furthermore, Point 5 of the Decision conflicts with Article 54C of the Regional Head Election Law, which requires the empty-column mechanism when only one candidate pair remains. This study contributes a novel perspective by examining the hybrid legal character of KPU Decisions and clarifying the limits of electoral administrative discretion in protecting citizens’ meaningful voting rights.
Legal analysis of the status and content of general election commission decision number 1774 of 2024 in the election of the mayor of Banjarbaru Muhammad Ridho Taufiq; Maksum Maksum; Abdul Hamid
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v6i1.156

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the legal position and substantive content of General Elections Commission Decision Number 1774 of 2024 within the regulatory system of regional head elections, focusing on the 2024 Banjarbaru mayoral election. This study addresses a gap in electoral law scholarship, which has primarily examined election administration and dispute resolution but has given limited attention to the legal status of General Elections Commission Decisions that contain general and continuously applicable norms. The legal issue emerged when one candidate pair was disqualified after ballot printing, yet the election was not transformed into a single-candidate election using the empty-column mechanism. Instead, the General Elections Commission applied a technical provision declaring votes for the disqualified candidate pair invalid. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The study finds that Decision Number 1774 of 2024 cannot be classified as a beschikking because it lacks individual, concrete, and final characteristics. However, it also cannot be regarded as a regulation (regeling) because its authority is not derived from legislative delegation. The decision is more appropriately positioned as a beleidsregel or technical policy rule. Furthermore, Point 5 of the Decision conflicts with Article 54C of the Regional Head Election Law, which requires the empty-column mechanism when only one candidate pair remains. This study contributes a novel perspective by examining the hybrid legal character of KPU Decisions and clarifying the limits of electoral administrative discretion in protecting citizens’ meaningful voting rights.
Co-Authors Abdul Hamid Abdul Hamid Istiana Heriani Muhammad Ridho Taufiq Ningrum Ambarsari