Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

REKONSTRUKSI PEMBERI GRATIFIKASI SEBAGAI SUBYEK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Sulastri, Lusia; Tri Wibowo, Kurniawan
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (487.173 KB) | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v1i3.33

Abstract

Gratification has not yet been regulated by laws and regulations as a criminal act. This happened in the Samin Tan case, where the judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court released Samin Tan from granting a gratuity of IDR 5 billion to Eni Maulani Saragih as a member of Commission VII DPR for the 2014-2019 period. The current formulation of policies regarding gratification in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Corruption requires restructuring, especially in the substance of the meaning of gratification, reporting on receipt of gratification to the KPK, criminal sanctions, and qualifications of the giver and recipient of gratification. so that the optimization of the application and enforcement of appropriate laws is achieved, namely certainty and justice. Reconstruction of the gratification provider for corruption must be based on a low level of gratification and bribery according to its definition. Bribery has the definition of a relationship due to the consequences of actions that result in or influence a person in his position as a state administrator to the interests of the bribe giver. While gratification should only be a gift, without having to be associated with any reciprocal actions. With a clear distinction between bribery and pure gratification that does not lead to bribery, the weight of the punishment is determined. Likewise, the gratuity giver, if it is said to be a bribe, must explain how much punishment was given to him. For example, the giver of gratuities as referred to in Article 12 B of Law no. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes is the same as receiving gratuities. Thus the effect can be felt in a balanced way because it destroys requests and requests for prohibited acts.
Implementasi Pemenuhan Hak Perempuan Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Sulastri, Lusia
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Sasana: December 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sasana.v11i2.4429

Abstract

Perempuan yang berhadapan dengan hukum sering mengalami diskriminasi, hambatan, reviktimisasi, dan stereotip selama proses peradilan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji implementasi pemenuhan hak-hak perempuan dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia serta mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor penghambatnya. Dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun akses keadilan bagi perempuan telah diakomodir dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, implementasi riil masih menghadapi kendala signifikan. Secara normatif, penegak hukum telah melaksanakan pemenuhan hak perempuan dengan menerbitkan pedoman dan peraturan pelaksana. Namun, dalam praktiknya, hukum di Indonesia belum optimal melindungi hak-hak perempuan. Faktor penghambat meliputi substansi hukum, khususnya Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP) di kepolisian yang belum mengintegrasikan analisis gender dan sosial, kurangnya kompetensi aparat hukum seperti polisi, jaksa, dan hakim dalam menangani perkara perempuan, serta minimnya fasilitas khusus seperti Ruang Pelayanan Khusus yang berkualitas. Selain itu, budaya patriarki dan stereotip gender yang kuat mempengaruhi sikap dan keputusan penyidik, jaksa, dan hakim, yang berpotensi menyebabkan bias dan diskriminasi terhadap perempuan. Rekomendasi termasuk peningkatan pendidikan gender, reformasi SOP, dan penyediaan fasilitas yang memadai untuk mengatasi hambatan ini.
Implementasi Pemberian Remisi Sakit Berkepanjangan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan (Studi Kasus Rumah Tahanan Kelas I Pondok Bambu) Simanjuntak, Johannes; Sulastri, Lusia
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Humanitarian remission is granted based on humanitarian considerations as stipulated in Article 29 of Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 16 of 2023. This remission is granted to prisoners who have been sentenced to a maximum of 1 (one) year, are over 70 (seventy) years of age, and/or suffer from a chronic illness. Prolonged illness remission is granted on Health Day, which is April 7, to prisoners who have served a minimum of 6 (six) months, have good behavior, are not listed in the F register, and meet the provisions of Article 34C of Government Regulation Number 99 of 2012. The amount of remission granted ranges from 1 (one) to 6 (six) months. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Long-Term Illness Remission based on Law No. 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections at the Pondok Bambu Class I Detention Center and to identify the obstacles encountered. The results of the study show that the implementation of remission has been in accordance with applicable legal provisions through the application procedure, medical examination, and approval by the authorities. The data shows that during 2023–2025, there were three prisoners who received long-term sick remission. The obstacles found include administrative and institutional factors, as well as limitations in facilities and infrastructure, so improvements are needed to make the implementation of remission more effective and efficient.