Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.636
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Hermeneutika : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Hukum Sasana IBLAM Law Review Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Journal of Comprehensive Science Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Lex Publica Jurnal Keamanan Nasional Journal of Law and Security Studies Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Lusia Sulastri, Lusia
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Conceptualization of Grant of Justice Collaborator Status to Main Actors in Criminal Actions Sulastri, Lusia
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (February 2023)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v3i2.186

Abstract

The concept is not the main actor in determining Justice collaborators reap debate. This is because Richard Eliezer in the Brigadier J murder case was the main executor, even though he was the only person who was ordered to do so, but his position was that they were both perpetrators, but in fact it was accepted by the panel of judges. This research is aimed at examining the conceptualization of granting justice collaborator status to the main actors in criminal acts and the authority to grant justice collaborator status to the main actors in criminal acts. The results of the study state that the conceptualization of granting justice collaborator status to the main actors in criminal acts leads from the subjective pendulum to the objective pendulum. This means that so far the determination has been based on the subject, namely the main actor. However, with the rejections of Justice collaborator witnesses previously determined by the KPK or Prosecutors, the judge sees the objective actions of the perpetrators, this is what is called objective, no longer subjective whether the perpetrators themselves are the main actors or not. Determining the status of a justice collaborator who is awarded with a decision is the authority of the judge.
REKONSTRUKSI PEMBERI GRATIFIKASI SEBAGAI SUBYEK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Sulastri, Lusia; Tri Wibowo, Kurniawan
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (487.173 KB) | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v1i3.33

Abstract

Gratification has not yet been regulated by laws and regulations as a criminal act. This happened in the Samin Tan case, where the judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court released Samin Tan from granting a gratuity of IDR 5 billion to Eni Maulani Saragih as a member of Commission VII DPR for the 2014-2019 period. The current formulation of policies regarding gratification in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Corruption requires restructuring, especially in the substance of the meaning of gratification, reporting on receipt of gratification to the KPK, criminal sanctions, and qualifications of the giver and recipient of gratification. so that the optimization of the application and enforcement of appropriate laws is achieved, namely certainty and justice. Reconstruction of the gratification provider for corruption must be based on a low level of gratification and bribery according to its definition. Bribery has the definition of a relationship due to the consequences of actions that result in or influence a person in his position as a state administrator to the interests of the bribe giver. While gratification should only be a gift, without having to be associated with any reciprocal actions. With a clear distinction between bribery and pure gratification that does not lead to bribery, the weight of the punishment is determined. Likewise, the gratuity giver, if it is said to be a bribe, must explain how much punishment was given to him. For example, the giver of gratuities as referred to in Article 12 B of Law no. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes is the same as receiving gratuities. Thus the effect can be felt in a balanced way because it destroys requests and requests for prohibited acts.
Implementasi Pemenuhan Hak Perempuan Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Sulastri, Lusia
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Sasana: December 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sasana.v11i2.4429

Abstract

Perempuan yang berhadapan dengan hukum sering mengalami diskriminasi, hambatan, reviktimisasi, dan stereotip selama proses peradilan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji implementasi pemenuhan hak-hak perempuan dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia serta mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor penghambatnya. Dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun akses keadilan bagi perempuan telah diakomodir dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, implementasi riil masih menghadapi kendala signifikan. Secara normatif, penegak hukum telah melaksanakan pemenuhan hak perempuan dengan menerbitkan pedoman dan peraturan pelaksana. Namun, dalam praktiknya, hukum di Indonesia belum optimal melindungi hak-hak perempuan. Faktor penghambat meliputi substansi hukum, khususnya Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP) di kepolisian yang belum mengintegrasikan analisis gender dan sosial, kurangnya kompetensi aparat hukum seperti polisi, jaksa, dan hakim dalam menangani perkara perempuan, serta minimnya fasilitas khusus seperti Ruang Pelayanan Khusus yang berkualitas. Selain itu, budaya patriarki dan stereotip gender yang kuat mempengaruhi sikap dan keputusan penyidik, jaksa, dan hakim, yang berpotensi menyebabkan bias dan diskriminasi terhadap perempuan. Rekomendasi termasuk peningkatan pendidikan gender, reformasi SOP, dan penyediaan fasilitas yang memadai untuk mengatasi hambatan ini.
Implementasi Pemberian Remisi Sakit Berkepanjangan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan (Studi Kasus Rumah Tahanan Kelas I Pondok Bambu) Simanjuntak, Johannes; Sulastri, Lusia
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Humanitarian remission is granted based on humanitarian considerations as stipulated in Article 29 of Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 16 of 2023. This remission is granted to prisoners who have been sentenced to a maximum of 1 (one) year, are over 70 (seventy) years of age, and/or suffer from a chronic illness. Prolonged illness remission is granted on Health Day, which is April 7, to prisoners who have served a minimum of 6 (six) months, have good behavior, are not listed in the F register, and meet the provisions of Article 34C of Government Regulation Number 99 of 2012. The amount of remission granted ranges from 1 (one) to 6 (six) months. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Long-Term Illness Remission based on Law No. 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections at the Pondok Bambu Class I Detention Center and to identify the obstacles encountered. The results of the study show that the implementation of remission has been in accordance with applicable legal provisions through the application procedure, medical examination, and approval by the authorities. The data shows that during 2023–2025, there were three prisoners who received long-term sick remission. The obstacles found include administrative and institutional factors, as well as limitations in facilities and infrastructure, so improvements are needed to make the implementation of remission more effective and efficient.
The Politics of Asset Confiscation Law in Indonesia Sulastri, Lusia; Efendi, Bahtiyar; Gumilar, Gugun
Lex Publica Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58829/lp.10.1.2023.43-65

Abstract

Abstract. In practice, the system and mechanism for confiscating assets resulting from criminal acts in Indonesia, which are spread across several regulations, are still not optimal; therefore, an Asset Confiscation Bill was formed. This study examines the politics of criminal law in carrying out asset confiscation in Indonesia, the mechanisms that will be used in carrying out asset confiscation in Indonesia, and crucial matters that need to be considered in regulating asset confiscation through a normative approach. The results show that the politics of criminal law in confiscating assets in Indonesia is due to the need for a system that allows the effective and efficient confiscation of proceeds and instruments of criminal acts while paying attention to the values of justice without violating individual rights. The mechanism that will be used in confiscating assets in Indonesia under the Asset Confiscation Bill is non-criminal-based asset forfeiture. Crucial things that need to be considered include the careful execution of confiscating assets, specifying certain criminal acts to be regulated by the Asset Confiscation Bill, the utilization of the proceeds of asset confiscation from crimes not only for the state but also for parties who suffered harm as a result of related crimes, the necessity to regulate compensation for good-faith third parties, the possibility of retroactive enforcement of laws, and the consideration of non-cash assets or cryptocurrencies. Abstrak. Dalam praktiknya, sistem dan mekanisme penyitaan harta kekayaan hasil tindak pidana di Indonesia yang tersebar di beberapa peraturan masih belum optimal; Oleh karena itu, dibentuk RUU Perampasan Harta Kekayaan Tindak Pidana. Kajian ini mengkaji tentang politik hukum pidana dalam melakukan penyitaan harta kekayaan pidana di Indonesia, mekanisme yang akan digunakan dalam pelaksanaan perampasan harta kekayaan pidana di Indonesia, dan hal-hal krusial yang perlu diperhatikan dalam pengaturan perampasan harta kekayaan pidana melalui pendekatan normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa politik hukum pidana dalam penyitaan harta kekayaan hasil tindak pidana di Indonesia disebabkan oleh perlunya suatu sistem yang memungkinkan penyitaan hasil dan alat-alat tindak pidana berlangsung secara efektif dan efisien serta memperhatikan nilai-nilai keadilan tanpa melanggar hak individu. Mekanisme yang akan digunakan dalam penyitaan aset pidana di Indonesia berdasarkan RUU Perampasan Aset adalah perampasan aset berbasis non-kriminal. Hal krusial yang perlu diperhatikan antara lain penyitaan harta kekayaan hasil tindak pidana yang harus dilakukan secara hati-hati; RUU Perampasan Harta Kekayaan harus mengatur tindak pidana tertentu; hasil perampasan harta kekayaan dari tindak pidana tidak hanya digunakan untuk negara tetapi juga untuk pihak-pihak yang dirugikan akibat tindak pidana yang bersangkutan; perlu diatur ganti kerugian bagi pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik; kemungkinan penegakan hukum yang berlaku surut; dan kemungkinan aset non tunai atau mata uang kripto. Kata kunci: Politik hukum, Pencucian uang, Perampasan aset, Korupsi, Indonesia
Co-Authors Afifah, Fanny Efendi, Bahtiyar Gugun Gumilar, Gugun Hermansyah, Erwin Owan Laksanto Utomo Luqmanul Hakim Putri, Intan Amalia Simanjuntak, Johannes Tri Wibowo, Kurniawan Zainab , Nina