Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal for Advanced Research

Concept Of Consumer Protection Regarding The Availability Of Information On Snack Products Children In State Primary Schools Tengku Emilia Angraini; Melky Suhery Simamora; Junaidi Lubis; Anisah bt Ahmad; Muhammad Salim Fauzi; Wahyu Hadi Wijaya
International Journal of Advanced Research Vol. 1 No. 2: August 2024
Publisher : Outline Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61730/qqenp981

Abstract

The research focuses on consumer protection related to the availability of product information on children's snacks sold at public elementary schools (Public Alementary School) in Indonesia. Many snacks lack essential details such as nutritional information, waste management education, halal certification, ingredients, and Food and Drug Monitoring Agency license numbers on their packaging, which violates Indonesian regulations. This study aims to explore the concept of consumer protection regarding product information, children's rights to safe goods and services, and the implementation of consumer protection in public elementary schools. Using a qualitative research method with a normative-empirical juridical approach, the study collects primary data through interviews and secondary data from literature, journals, and other related sources. The findings indicate that consumer protection involves safeguarding consumer rights by ensuring adequate product information. Educating children as consumers is crucial for developing awareness of their rights. Public elementary schools play a vital role in ensuring that snacks sold are safe, of good quality, and meet hygiene standards. Schools should implement effective monitoring systems, including regular inspections of snack production and compliance with health standards. Additionally, consumer education at schools should teach children to choose healthy snacks, read food labels, and understand their rights as consumers, fostering informed decision-making and healthier choices.
Comparison of Legal Systems in Democratic and Autocratic Countries: Implications for Human Rights Junaidi Lubis; Melky Suhery Simamora; Siti Aisyah Binti Rahman; Muhammad Salim Fauzi; Muhammad baddawi kurniadi
International Journal of Advanced Research Vol. 1 No. 2: August 2024
Publisher : Outline Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61730/4q7nk389

Abstract

This study examines the comparative effectiveness of legal systems in democratic and autocratic countries in upholding and promoting human rights. Democratic systems, characterized by judicial independence, transparency, and accountability, generally provide a robust framework for protecting individual freedoms and ensuring equitable governance. In contrast, autocratic systems, marked by centralized power and limited oversight, often prioritize political stability over the protection of human rights, resulting in systemic abuses and marginalization of vulnerable groups. The research explores key dimensions such as judicial autonomy, freedom of expression, political participation, and the role of civil society, highlighting stark differences in how these systems function. The findings reveal that democracies offer stronger institutional mechanisms for addressing human rights challenges, including access to justice, legislative inclusivity, and adherence to international norms. Autocratic regimes, however, frequently exploit legal systems to maintain control, using laws as tools for oppression and surveillance. The study underscores the critical role of governance structures in shaping human rights outcomes, advocating for the strengthening of democratic institutions and global human rights standards. Future research should delve into hybrid systems and transitions between governance types to further elucidate their impact on human rights.
The Influence of Globalization on the Harmonization of International and National Law Junaidi Lubis; Melky Suhery Simamora; Bambang Sutejo; Dedek syafrizal
International Journal of Advanced Research Vol. 1 No. 3: October 2024
Publisher : Outline Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61730/ny5gv396

Abstract

Globalization has had a significant impact on the harmonization of international and national laws, affecting areas such as trade, environment, and human rights. This study explores the impact of globalization on legal harmonization, identifying key drivers such as economic integration, technological advancement, and the role of international organizations. It also highlights emerging challenges, including legal pluralism, cultural resistance, and disparities in institutional capacity across countries. Using a qualitative approach, legal analysis is conducted to identify patterns of convergence and divergence across legal systems, including common law, civil law, and hybrid legal systems. Case studies such as the implementation of the Paris Agreement, the adaptation of WTO trade law standards, and the mainstreaming of human rights in developing countries reveal the success rates and obstacles in harmonization. The results show that while harmonization promotes global cooperation and reduces legal protection, challenges remain. Fragmentation of international law, geopolitical tensions, and differences in local values ​​are key barriers. To address these, the study recommends an adaptive framework, enhanced multilateral cooperation, and investment in developing country capacity building. In conclusion, legal harmonization requires a balance between global norms and local relevance, so as to create an inclusive and effective legal system. A collaborative approach involving stakeholders across borders is key to bridging the gap between international standards and national realities.