Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.881
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis MAHESA : Malahayati Health Student Journal Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Journal of Innovative and Creativity Journal of Shariah Economics
Vieta Imelda Cornelis
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Humanities Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Analisis Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Distribusi Komersial (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 555 K/Pdt/2025 David Sutrisno; Subekti Subekti; Renda Aranggraeni; Vieta Imelda Cornelis
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): Oktober 2026
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A commercial distribution agreement is an important legal instrument in trading activities that establishes a contractual relationship between producers and distributors, often on a long-term basis. In practice, such relationships may be affected by breaches of contract (wanprestasi), as occurred in the dispute between PT Parit Padang Global and PT Maesindo Indonesia, which resulted in Supreme Court Decision Number 555 K/Pdt/2025. This study aims to examine the qualification of breach of contract in commercial distribution agreements under Indonesian civil law and the legal considerations of the Supreme Court in the decision. This study employs a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are analyzed qualitatively using deductive reasoning. The results show that the breach of contract committed by PT Maesindo Indonesia as the principal was qualified as a total failure to perform its obligations (algehele niet nakoming), namely the failure to take back the remaining products stored in the distributor's warehouse after the distribution agreement had ended, based on the fulfillment of the elements of breach of contract as stipulated in Articles 1320 and 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The Supreme Court rejected the Defendant's appeal and upheld the Judex Facti decision, reasoning that a valid agreement remains legally binding after the contractual relationship has ended and that the Defendant was required to pay compensation amounting to IDR 5,035,642,749.32 pursuant to Articles 1243, 1246, and 1250 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The decision also rejected the obscuur libel objection and the exceptio non adimpleti contractus defense, reflecting an emphasis on substantive justice rather than a formalistic approach in resolving commercial contract disputes
Co-Authors Abiddin, Andi Hayyun Adi Sylvia Intan Pramesti Eas Agasjtya Wisjnu Wardhana Ainyes Priskila Sari Anggarawan Tri Jayanto Anggita Permadi David Sutrisno Eprilia Atriya Nur Afifah Fathul Hamdani Fitri Ayuningtyas Imma Apriana Jamhari Moh. Taufik Muchammad Choirur Roziqin Noenik Soekorini Renda Aranggraeni Seprian Aqsho Hidayatulloh Sri Astutik Subekti . Vallencia Nadya Paramita Vallencia Nandya Paramitha