Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

The LEGAL PROTECTION FOR CONSUMER OF DRUG PRODUCER THAT DOES NOT HAVE A DISTRIBUTION PERMIT FROM THE FOOD AND DRUG CONTROL AGENCY (BPOM) Hendra Lazuardi; Nur Handayati
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): OCTOBER
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v2i4.772

Abstract

For maintain health in carrying out daily activities, humans consume drugs as a healing solution for the ailments they experience. However, cases of illegal drug distribution threaten the health of someone who accidentally consumes illegal drugs without testing by the Food and Drug Monitoring Agency. The purpose of this research is to analyze the process of granting licenses to the distribution of drugs by BPOM and legal protection for consumers against the distribution of drugs that do not have distribution permits. This type of research is normative legal research with the Statue and Case Approach. Analysis data used descriptive qualitative analysis of existing laws and regulations to find answers to cases of drug trafficking that do not have a distribution permit. The results of the study prove that the process of granting permits for drug distribution by BPOM is carried out in two stages, namely the Pre-registration and Registration stages with the fulfillment of the required statements and documents. The evaluation process is carried out for 100 days for new drug products which is carried out by the Head of the BPOM Agency. Legal protection for consumers against the distribution of drugs that do not have a distribution permit is by imposing a maximum imprisonment of 15 years and a maximum fine of IDR 1,500,000,000.00 for the perpetrator. For producers who do not have the expertise and authority to carry out pharmaceutical practices, they will be fined a maximum of IDR. 100,000,000.00.
Perbandingan Pemenuhan Hak Anak Sah dan Anak Luar Kawin Ario Bimo Hanggono; Ernu Widodo; Muhammad Yustino Aribawa; Nur Handayati
Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary on Social and Technology Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli - Oktober
Publisher : PT Ilmu Data Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69693/ijmst.v4i3.13103

Abstract

Perbedaan status kelahiran anak masih menjadi isu hukum yang memengaruhi pemenuhan hak-hak anak dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hak anak yang lahir di dalam dan di luar perkawinan serta membandingkan pemenuhan hak antara anak sah dan anak luar kawin berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan analisis kualitatif terhadap bahan hukum melalui pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Data penelitian diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif menggunakan teori perlindungan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem hukum Indonesia pada prinsipnya telah menjamin pemenuhan hak anak tanpa membedakan status kelahirannya, meliputi hak atas identitas, hubungan keperdataan, pengasuhan, pendidikan, kesehatan, kesejahteraan, dan perlindungan dari diskriminasi. Perbedaan utama antara anak sah dan anak luar kawin terletak pada mekanisme pengakuan hubungan keperdataan dengan ayah biologis, khususnya setelah berlakunya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa perlindungan hak anak harus berorientasi pada prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak dan asas non-diskriminasi. Oleh karena itu, harmonisasi pengaturan antara Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, dan ketentuan administrasi kependudukan diperlukan untuk meningkatkan efektivitas perlindungan hukum terhadap seluruh anak. Penelitian selanjutnya disarankan menggunakan pendekatan sosio-legal atau penelitian hukum empiris untuk mengevaluasi implementasi perlindungan hak anak dalam praktik.
Legal Construction of Corporate Liability for Coal Mine Reclamation: A Normative Study and Enforcement Constraints Andi Ferial Junaedy; M. Syahrul Borman; Nur Handayati
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 7 (2026): Ipso Jure - August
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/yfqg1n51

Abstract

This research is motivated by the persistent weakness in enforcing corporate liability for coal mining reclamation, despite its formal regulation under Indonesian positive law. Reclamation as an instrument for environmental restoration is often treated merely as an administrative obligation, resulting in suboptimal protection and recovery of the environment. The research addresses two main issues: the legal construction of corporate liability in coal mining reclamation under Indonesian law and the obstacles to enforcing such liability in practice. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches, based on a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that, normatively, corporations are recognized as legal subjects directly responsible for reclamation as a legal consequence of natural resource exploitation. However, the enforcement of corporate liability remains constrained by normative ambiguities, regulatory disharmony, conceptual tensions between fault-based liability and high-risk mining activities, evidentiary difficulties in establishing causation, and institutional weaknesses in governmental oversight. These constraints significantly undermine the effectiveness of reclamation obligations as instruments for environmental protection and restoration within coal mining activities in Indonesia.
Criminal Liability For Phishing And Data Breach Crimes In Digital Transactions Agussapriadi Lubis; M. Syahrul Borman; Nur Handayati
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 7 (2026): Ipso Jure - August
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/n09kg073

Abstract

The accelerated growth of digital transactions has intensified exposure to cybercrime risks, particularly phishing and data breaches, which undermine personal data security and erode public confidence in electronic systems. Despite Indonesia’s adoption of the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions and the Law on Personal Data Protection, phishing and data breach incidents persist and continue to generate difficulties in the practical application of criminal law. This study seeks to examine the forms of criminal liability that may be attributed to perpetrators of phishing and data breach offenses within digital transaction contexts, while also identifying the principal barriers to effective criminal law enforcement against these crimes. The research applies a normative legal methodology using statutory and conceptual approaches, grounded in an analysis of relevant legislation, criminal law doctrines, and key theoretical frameworks concerning cybercrime and personal data protection. The findings indicate that phishing and data breach crimes can be subject to criminal liability even though phishing is not explicitly formulated as a specific offense; however, their enforcement faces normative, conceptual, evidentiary, institutional, and technological obstacles. These constraints reflect tensions between fundamental principles of criminal law and the dynamic nature of cybercrime, highlighting the need for a more adaptive and effective criminal law policy to ensure the security of digital transactions
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI JUAL BELI ONLINE MELALUI BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA Raden Roro Fernanda Tasya Annora; Sri Astutik; Nur Handayati; Deddi Wrdana Nasoetion
Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari'ah Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): JICL
Publisher : Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari'ah Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Belanja online memiliki risiko, seperti barang yang tidak sesuai, pengiriman terlambat, atau bahkan penipuan. Penelitian ini membahas permasalahan perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen dalam transaksi jual beli online dan penyelesaian sengketa melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa akibat wanprestasi yang dilakukan pelaku usaha. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menjadikan peraturan perundang-undangan sebagai bahan kajian utama serta bahan hukum lainnya yang bersumber pada studi pustaka. Hasil dari penelitian ini yakni : perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen dalam transaksi online diatur dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen dan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Konsumen yang mengalami kerugian akibat dari transaksi on line yang dilakukan dapat mengajukan gugatan ganti rudi melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen. Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen merupakan alternatif yang lebih praktis dibandingkan pengadilan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa konsumen. Namun, masih terdapat kelemahan, seperti kurangnya pemahaman konsumen tentang prosedur pengajuan gugatan dan proses hukum yang masih harus memakan waktu, karena meskipun putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen bersifat final dan mengikat, tetapi masih dimunkingkan pengajuan keberatan oleh para pihak, sehingga tidak dapat langsung dilaksanakan eksekusi.