Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Jurnal Pengabdian Kolaborasi dan Inovasi IPTEKS Sultan Adam : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial
Siti Marwiyah
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
A Legal Analysis of Judges' Legal Considerations in State Administrative Disputes Relating to the Cancellation of Building use Rights Certificates Riska Ayu Khusnul Laila; Siti Marwiyah; Sri Sukmana Damayanti
Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 16 No. 01 (2026): Fox justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : SEAN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Overlapping land rights disputes between historical evidence claims and modern administrative registration trigger complex legal uncertainty in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the rechtmatigheid principle by the Supreme Court in Decision Number 281 K/TUN/2023 regarding the cancellation of Building Use Rights Certificates based on Article 30 paragraph (1) letter c of PP No. 24 of 1997, as well as to dissect the judge's considerations in rejecting the Judicial Review in Decision Number 124 PK/TUN/2024. The research method used is normative legal research with a statute approach and a case approach. The results of the study indicate that the Supreme Court prioritizes the value of procedural legal certainty (Rechtssicherheit) over the material claims of individuals who neglect to use the 90-day deadline for filing a lawsuit after a deadlocked mediation, in line with the doctrine of vigilantibus non dormientibus iura subveniunt. The definitive rejection of the application for Judicial Review is based on the failure to fulfill the criteria of decisive novum (new, decisive evidence) as regulated in a restrictive manner in SEMA Number 2 of 2019. The conclusion of the study confirms that the validity of certificates in the land administration system is highly dependent on the integration between compliance with official procedures and the vigilance of legal subjects in defending their rights.
PENGUATAN KAPASITAS MASYARAKAT TERHADAP RISIKO BANJIR MELALUI SINERGI PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH DAN APLIKASI INARISK Priyanto Priyanto; Galuh Ajeng Ayuningtiyas; Fedianty Augustinah; Siti Marwiyah
Jurnal Pengabdian Kolaborasi dan Inovasi IPTEKS Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April
Publisher : CV. Alina

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59407/jpki2.v4i2.3654

Abstract

Pengabdian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kapasitas masyarakat Desa Sentong terhadap risiko banjir melalui pendekatan Participatory Action Research (PAR) dan pemanfaatan aplikasi INARISK sebagai media mitigasi berbasis digital. Metode pengabdian yang digunakan adalah Participatory Action Research (PAR) dengan tahapan identifikasi masalah, perencanaan partisipatif, implementasi intervensi, monitoring dan evaluasi, serta refleksi keberlanjutan program. Kegiatan dilaksanakan melalui pelatihan mitigasi bencana, edukasi kebencanaan berbasis experiential learning di sekolah dasar, pelatihan penggunaan aplikasi INARISK, simulasi evakuasi, pembentukan Tim Siaga Banjir, dan penanaman 500 bibit pohon di bantaran sungai. Hasil pengabdian menunjukkan adanya peningkatan literasi kebencanaan dan kapasitas digital masyarakat, di mana 85% peserta mampu menggunakan aplikasi INARISK untuk mengakses peta risiko dan pelaporan bencana, serta terjadi peningkatan pemahaman siswa sebesar 65% berdasarkan hasil pre-test dan post-test. Selain itu, terbentuknya Tim Siaga Banjir Desa Sentong menunjukkan adanya penguatan kelembagaan lokal dan sistem peringatan dini berbasis komunitas. Simpulan pengabdian ini menunjukkan bahwa sinergi antara pendekatan partisipatif dan teknologi digital efektif dalam meningkatkan kapasitas adaptif masyarakat terhadap risiko banjir, memperkuat ketahanan sosial-ekologis desa, serta mendukung terwujudnya desa tangguh bencana yang berkelanjutan.  
ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT AS THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF PHYSICIAN RELATIONSHIPS AND PATIENTS IN MALPRACTICE CASES: (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 21/Pdt.G/2018/PN Mnk) Irwan Lazuardi; Siti Marwiyah
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): OCTOBER
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v2i4.774

Abstract

The implementation of medical behavior involves two parties, namely doctors or other health workers as executors of medical behavior and patients as recipients of medical behavior bound in Informed Consent. However, the occurrence of malpractice cases causes the role of Informed Consent to be doubted both from the patient and doctor's side because the validity of Informed Consent becomes biased if there is no legal basis and knowledge of the agreement. The research aims to analyze the role of Informed Consent as legal protection for the relationship between doctors and patients in cases of malpractice and to analyze the legal remedies given to doctors and patients in malpractice cases in Supreme Court Decision Number 21/Pdt.G/2018/PN Mnk. This type of research is normative research using a statutory-based approach. The process of collecting data through a literature study with an analysis of legal materials through a qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of the study prove that the role of informed consent as legal protection is not entirely a determinant of a case being declared as malpractice. From the decision Number 21/Pdt.G/2018/PN Mnk it was concluded that the existence of Informed Consent could not be used as legal protection because the doctor was proven to have made a mistake in setting the drug dosage. Related to the legal protection given to patients who are victims of malpractice is the Health Law no. 23 of 1992 which gives everyone the right to ask for compensation for mistakes and negligence committed by health workers.
ANALISIS YURIDIS RATIO DECIDENDI HAKIM DALAM MENENTUKAN KUALIFIKASI LUKA BERAT PADA TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN: STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2/Pid.B/2025/PN Mnd Allan Larenaung; Wahyu Prawesthi; Siti Marwiyah
SULTAN ADAM: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Juli-Desember 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Tanggui Baimbaian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71456/sultan.v4i2.2283

Abstract

Penentuan kualifikasi luka berat dalam tindak pidana penganiayaan masih menimbulkan perbedaan pertimbangan hakim sehingga berpotensi memengaruhi konsistensi putusan dan kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis ratio decidendi hakim dalam menentukan kualifikasi luka berat pada Putusan Nomor 2/Pid.B/2025/PN Mnd serta menilai kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip kepastian hukum. Penelitian menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Populasi penelitian berupa seluruh norma hukum, doktrin, dan putusan yang berkaitan dengan penentuan luka berat, sedangkan sampel penelitian adalah Putusan Nomor 2/Pid.B/2025/PN Mnd yang dipilih secara purposif sebagai objek utama kajian. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan studi dokumentasi terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, sedangkan analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan metode preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hakim menentukan luka berat melalui penilaian terpadu terhadap visum et repertum, fakta persidangan, alat bukti yang sah, hubungan kausal, dan penerapan norma hukum, sehingga visum et repertum tidak menjadi dasar tunggal pembuktian. Kesimpulannya, kualitas ratio decidendi yang sistematis dan argumentatif merupakan prasyarat penting bagi terwujudnya kepastian hukum, serta Model Tiga Tahap Penentuan Luka Berat dapat menjadi kerangka konseptual untuk memperkuat konsistensi pertimbangan hakim.
Co-Authors Allan Larenaung Fedianty Augustinah Galuh Ajeng Ayuningtiyas Irwan Lazuardi Priyanto Priyanto Riska Ayu Khusnul Laila Sri Sukmana Damayanti Wahyu Prawesthi