Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

OPTIMIZING HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH INTEGRATED EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAMS Jubaidi, Didi; Khoirunnisa
Jurnal Humaniora dan Sosial Sains Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Pojok Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Human Resource Development (HRD) is a key element in enhancing the competitiveness and productivity of an organization or country. Education and training play a central role in this process, as they not only equip individuals with the necessary knowledge and skills but also aid in personal and professional development. This study aims to analyze the basic concepts and definitions of HRD, as well as its vital role in achieving organizational goals. This research is a library research study that seeks to explore and analyze various literature sources related to the concept of Human Resources (HR) and its development within the organizational context. The findings also reveal that well-designed training programs, tailored to the specific needs of both the organization and the individual, are more likely to enhance performance and productivity.
The Barzanji Tradition in The Context of Cultural Studies: Exploring The Debate Between Sunnah and Bid'ah Jubaidi, Didi; Khoirunnisa, Khoirunnisa
TRANS-KATA: Journal of Language, Literature, Culture and Education Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): TRANS-KATA: Journal of Language, Literature, Culture, and Education
Publisher : TRANSBAHASA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54923/jllce.v4i2.68

Abstract

This article discusses the role of the famous Islamic literary work Barzanji in the context of cultural studies about concepts such as tradition, sunnah, and heresy in Islam. The Barzanji is a work that recounts the life of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) with awe and affection and has become an integral part of religious traditions in many Muslim-majority countries. This article also aims to examine the importance of understanding tradition and sunnah in diverse cultural contexts, as well as addressing the potential issue of heresy in religious practices related to the use of Barzanji. This research uses a qualitative method with a cultural studies approach. The cultural studies approach was chosen because this research wants to examine the complex interaction between Barzanji and Muslim society.  Overall, this study concludes that Barzanji plays an important role in upholding and strengthening religious identity in certain Muslim communities, especially through its recitation in religious events. That is the context of religious practice, change or innovation (bid'ah) is acceptable if it conforms to the basic principles of the Sunnah. That is, there are situations where bid'ah can be used to enhance or perfect the understanding and practice of the Sunnah. In this perspective, the concepts of sunnah and bid'ah do not have to be seen separately but can complement each other in the context of religious interpretation and practice.
Principles of quantum physics: A phenomenological study of illegal mining in the construction of social justice Widiatmoko, Dekki; Saputra, Dedi; Jubaidi, Didi
Gravity : Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika Vol 10 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30870/gravity.v10i1.29227

Abstract

Illegal mining, better known as illegal mining, is a complex multidimensional problem. This study uses a phenomenological lens to explore the deep meaning of the experiences of illegal mining actors in the Merangin Regency, Jambi. The findings of this study consistently show that severe economic pressures, combined with limited access to education and job opportunities, are the main drivers of community involvement in illegal mining activities. Informants explicitly stated that they knew their actions' legal and environmental implications but felt trapped in a difficult situation. By adopting a quantum physics lens, this study emphasizes that individuals, like subatomic particles, are often in a state of superposition between various choices, trapped in moral and economic dilemmas. This approach offers an innovative analytical framework for understanding the complexity of contemporary social problems. To overcome this problem, comprehensive efforts involve expanding economic opportunities, developing community capacity, and enforcing fair and community-friendly laws. Overall, this study highlights the importance of understanding the social and economic contexts that underlie community involvement in illegal mining activities. By adopting an interdisciplinary approach combining qualitative methods and quantum physics concepts, this study significantly contributes to developing more effective policies and intervention programs in addressing this problem.  
Ultimum Remedium Principles: Realizing Restorative Justice For Children In Conflict With The Law Wagiman, Wagiman; Jubaidi, Didi
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v18i3.2984

Abstract

This research analyzes the extent to which the concept of the Ultimum Remedium Principle becomes the principle basis for judges to keep children out of prison. This principle encourages problem-solving efforts involving perpetrators, victims and other parties. The provisions of Law No. 11/2012 are a form of certainty in providing clear guidelines for judges in making decisions that are optimal for the interests of children, in accordance with the principle of the Ultimum Remedium Principle. Nonetheless, some judges still tend to take action based on the theory of retaliation when determining responsibility for the wrongdoing committed by the child. This study aims to determine the extent to which this country has a legal umbrella in protecting children and to determine the optimization of the application of the ultimum remedium principle to crimes committed by children. This research is a normative juridical study. The results showed that the settlement of cases of children in conflict with the law according to Law No. 11/2012 is to prioritize alternative out-of-court settlements which are the basic principles in the legal system governing child protection. This approach is in line with the principles of human rights and the best interests of the child.
SOCIAL MEDIA AND CYBERBULLYING: LEGAL AND ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES IN COMMUNICATION Khoirunnisa, Khoirunnisa; Jubaidi, Didi
Jurnal Humaniora dan Sosial Sains Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pojok Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Cyberbullying is intimidation conducted through social media, emerging with the rise of technology and social media use. This phenomenon has severe psychological impacts on victims. This study examines cyberbullying from the perspectives of law and communication ethics, recognizing that current regulations often inadequately address such cases. The ethical use of social media is essential, not only to uphold dignity but also to prevent negative effects and legal complications. This research analyzes the role of social media in cyberbullying and the legal and ethical aspects of its regulation in Indonesia. Employing a normative juridical method with a legislative approach, the study uses secondary data from literature. Findings reveal that cyberbullying stems from insufficient ethical awareness in social media use. Addressing this requires stronger, specific regulations to improve case management, enhance victim protection, and foster a safer, more respectful online environment.
Analysis of the Elimination of Strict Liability in the Omnibus Law on Massive Deforestation in Indonesia and its Effect on Global Warming and Climate Change Khoirunnisa, Khoirunnisa; Jubaidi, Didi
GLOBAL INSIGHT JOURNAL Vol 10, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/gij.v10i1.7913

Abstract

The Job Creation Law or omnibus law passed in 2020 has caused controversy among the public and legal experts. One aspect that has attracted attention is the elimination of corporations as parties that can be held criminally liable. Previously, corporations could be convicted if they were involved in environmental crimes. However, with the adoption of Omnibus Law, corporate criminal liability has been abolished, except in cases of environmental crimes that result in human death.  The elimination of Strict Liability in the Omnibus Law against perpetrators of Massive Deforestation in Indonesia can have a major effect on global warming and climate change. This article analyzes the impact of the elimination of corporate liability in criminal acts and the importance of considering the balance between economic interests and social justice. The purpose of this research is to find out how the impact of the elimination of the principle of strict liability in the criminal act of forest destruction passed in 2020 on Global Warming and Climate Change. This research uses a normative juridical approach, with a literature study that includes various sources such as scientific writings or articles in the form of books, online media, dissertations or other literature. The elimination of the principle of strict liability in the omnibus law has affected massive deforestation in Indonesia closely related to environmental protection and maintenance. Without strict liability, proving fault or negligence in deforestation cases becomes more. the elimination of strict liability for corporate criminal liability in cases of massive deforestation in Indonesia can have significant implications for global warming and climate change. It may reduce deterrence, make it harder to hold corporations accountable, and hinder efforts to protect the environment.
The Separatist Movements: A Review of The Conflict Between Self-Determination, State Sovereignty and International Law Khoirunnisa, Khoirunnisa; Jubaidi, Didi
Jurnal Polinter : Kajian Politik dan Hubungan Internasional Vol 10, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/pol.v10i2.8230

Abstract

Separatism is a complex and sensitive issue in the context of international law and human rights. This research aims to explore the correlation between self-determination and human rights in relation to separatist movements, with a focus on the conflicts that arise between state sovereignty and international law. The article also analyzes several case studies of separatist conflicts in various regions to provide a more concrete understanding. The research methodology employed is a normative juridical approach, utilizing literature review from diverse sources such as books, online media, dissertations, and other relevant literature. The research findings confirm that self-determination is recognized as a human right in international law. This right allows ethnic, national, or regional groups to determine their own destiny, including the option of secession from an existing state and in the national law of Indonesia, the right to self-determination is interpreted in the context of regional autonomy. However, conflicts arise when the implementation of self-determination contradicts the principle of state sovereignty. The separatist movement involves complex correlations between self-determination, human rights, state sovereignty, and international law. Sustainable conflict resolution requires a balanced and comprehensive approach that recognizes and protects human rights without disregarding the principle of state sovereignty.
REINTERPRETING ARTICLE 251 KUHD: CASE STUDY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NO. 83/PUU-XXII/2024 Jubaidi, Didi
Jurnal Humaniora dan Sosial Sains Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Pojok Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Article 251 of the Indonesian Commercial Code (KUHD) grants insurance companies the right to unilaterally annul insurance contracts if the insured party conceals or misrepresents relevant facts, even without malicious intent. While grounded in the doctrine of uberrimae fidei (utmost good faith), this provision raises concerns about legal certainty and the balance of contractual rights. In 2024, the Indonesian Constitutional Court issued Decision No. 83/PUU-XXII/2024, declaring Article 251 conditionally unconstitutional. The Court ruled that insurance contracts cannot be annulled solely by the insurer without mutual agreement or a judicial decision, emphasizing the protection of constitutional principles of fairness and justice. This decision reshapes the legal landscape by limiting insurers' unilateral power and strengthening procedural fairness. It also urges the Financial Services Authority (OJK) to update legal frameworks and annulment procedures, reinforcing the protection of policyholders' rights.
Populist Parties and Pork-Barrel Politics in Indonesia: The Erosion of Political Morality Jubaidi, Didi; Khoirunnisa, Khoirunnisa
Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): July 2025
Publisher : Unit Publikasi Ilmiah, P3M, Politeknik Negeri Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31940/soshum.v15i2.108-116

Abstract

The phenomenon of populist parties and "pork barrel" politics in Indonesia often emerges with promises of radical change and claims to represent the "voice of the people." However, in practice, these parties frequently become entangled in corruption, nepotism, and clientelism, undermining political integrity and public trust. "Pork barrel" politics in Indonesia refers to the strategic and often inequitable distribution of state resources—such as regional development projects or social assistance programs—used to secure political support. This study examines how these practices erode not only political morality and democratic integrity but also the social and psychological underpinnings of public trust in government institutions. Employing a qualitative approach with case studies and document analysis, the research explores corruption cases involving public officials and the broader societal impacts of "pork barrel" politics. The findings reveal that these practices have not only degraded the ethical standards of political actors but have also fostered widespread public cynicism, exacerbating a psychological sense of distrust and disillusionment with the political system. To address these challenges, the study highlights the need for systemic reforms, including greater transparency in budget allocation, robust legal enforcement against corruption, and political education that prioritizes ethical behavior, civic responsibility, and trust-building. These efforts are vital for restoring public confidence, strengthening democratic values, and fostering a more morally grounded political culture in Indonesia.
Populist Parties and Pork-Barrel Politics in Indonesia: The Erosion of Political Morality Jubaidi, Didi; Khoirunnisa, Khoirunnisa
Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): July 2025
Publisher : Unit Publikasi Ilmiah, P3M, Politeknik Negeri Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31940/soshum.v15i2.108-116

Abstract

The phenomenon of populist parties and "pork barrel" politics in Indonesia often emerges with promises of radical change and claims to represent the "voice of the people." However, in practice, these parties frequently become entangled in corruption, nepotism, and clientelism, undermining political integrity and public trust. "Pork barrel" politics in Indonesia refers to the strategic and often inequitable distribution of state resources—such as regional development projects or social assistance programs—used to secure political support. This study examines how these practices erode not only political morality and democratic integrity but also the social and psychological underpinnings of public trust in government institutions. Employing a qualitative approach with case studies and document analysis, the research explores corruption cases involving public officials and the broader societal impacts of "pork barrel" politics. The findings reveal that these practices have not only degraded the ethical standards of political actors but have also fostered widespread public cynicism, exacerbating a psychological sense of distrust and disillusionment with the political system. To address these challenges, the study highlights the need for systemic reforms, including greater transparency in budget allocation, robust legal enforcement against corruption, and political education that prioritizes ethical behavior, civic responsibility, and trust-building. These efforts are vital for restoring public confidence, strengthening democratic values, and fostering a more morally grounded political culture in Indonesia.