Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.989
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Jurnal Media Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum BERDIKARI : Jurnal Inovasi dan Penerapan Ipteks Varia Justicia Amalee: Indonesian Journal of Community Research & Engagement Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) Media of Law and Sharia Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal BHIRAWA LAW JOURNAL Yuridika Jurnal Hukum Pelita Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Media of Law and Sharia Law Research Review Quarterly
Budi Setianingrum, Reni
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
THE SOCIAL MEDIA ALGORITHMS & PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION: THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EUROPEAN UNION, CHINA & INDONESIAN LAW Setianingrum, Reni Budi; Nur Dewata, Mukti Fajar; Mashdurohatun, Anis
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v11i1.31740

Abstract

The social media utilize algorithms to increase productive and targeted promotions which regulate the flow of information circulating in the system, and usually record user habits and monitor their personal activities for business profits. This phenomena raise issues amongst academia about the importance of user confidentiality governance in social media. This research is a normative research using conceptual approach and statutory approach, aims to examine whether an algorithms system breach of personal data protection law in European Union, China and Indonesia. The result of this research is the use of algorithm is not explicitly prohibited in European Union States, China and Indonesian Law. Normatively, algorithms utilization do not breach the data protection law in these three countries as long as it uses with user permission, uses for legal reason, provide explanation and protection to the user personal data.
Penegakan Hukum Jasa Titip (Jastip) Tiket Konser Melalui Website Ilegal Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Huwaida, Nisrina; Budi Setianingrum, Reni
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jh.v5i1.3449

Abstract

Law enforcement related to concert ticket entrustment services through illegal websites in the perspective of consumer protection law is an important issue in the realm of consumer law. Cases of fraud in the sale of illegal concert ticketing services are being investigated by the authorities, and criminal sanctions can be given to the business actors involved. Legal protection for consumers who have been harmed is also regulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, which provides legal consequences for business actors who do not fulfill their obligations, including fines and penalties. In addition, legal protection of consumers also involves coordination with relevant agencies, the delivery of information to increase consumer awareness, and consumer support in fighting for their rights. Therefore, law enforcement in the case of illegal concert ticketing services through the website involves criminal sanctions, legal protection of consumers, and efforts to increase consumer awareness
LEGAL CONSTRUCTION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION OF NON-PAYMENT DEBTORS IN PAYLATER SHOPEE Kusnaedy, Dina; Setianingrum, Reni Budi
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Various Issues on Law and Development
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/llrq.v10i1.8082

Abstract

Shopee is the number one online shopping platform in Indonesia. Provides the Paylater feature, namely the buy now and pay later system. In the financing flow, Shopee collaborates with PT Lentera Dana Nusantara as a financing institution. Therefore, the involvement of several parties needs to be understood as well as their legal position and rights and obligations. The ease of use of this feature causes the problem of debtors who do not pay their bills. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the efforts taken in the dispute. This study uses a statute approach with a normative juridical method. Secondary data types sourced from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials with literature study data collection techniques and interviews with respondents that are purposive. Qualitative analysis techniques that are descriptive. The results of Shopee's Paylater research  are a form of cooperation between PT Shopee Internasional and PT Commerce Finance under the OJK which is continued by PT Lentera Dana Nusantara. The financing agreement gives rise to the regulation of the POJK Civil Code and the UUPK because there are three parties involved in the Paylater feature, namely consumers,  Shopee Paylater feature providers  and Fintech. OJK Regulation No. 10/POJK.05/2022. The systematics of using Paylater can be found out by users in the Shopee application in the Paylater menu. Default from the user's default is only in the form of payment interest. 5% of the total bill per month as a consequence of late payment. Some of the efforts made by Shopee are by freezing user accounts and making periodic payments to recording late payments in SLIK OJK. In conclusion, the need for legal protection is not only preventive legal protection but also repressive legal protection.
Studi Komparatif Perlindungan Hukum dan Pengaturan Scalping Tiket Konser K-Pop di Indonesia dan Korea Selatan Ghina Shofi Nabila; Setianingrum, Reni Budi
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/ijclc.v6i3.27330

Abstract

The practice of purchasing tickets for resale at higher prices (scalping) is increasingly prevalent in Indonesia, but to date there are still no specific regulations, unlike South Korea, which has specifically regulated this practice. This research uses a quantitative approach with a normative-empirical comparative study, with data obtained from legal documents, official reports, and scientific literature. Based on this research, it can be concluded that there is a gap in legal protection between the two countries. South Korea has a more comprehensive regulatory system through explicit prohibitions in law and the use of technology in ticketing, which has been proven to significantly reduce scalping. In contrast, in Indonesia, regulations still do not provide adequate legal protection and specific provisions for ticket scalping. Indonesia needs to develop more specific regulations and implement a technology-based ticketing system to ensure fair access and consumer protection.
Co-Authors Alqaisa, Qina Anis Mashdurohatun Ardila, Revi Aswad Ishak, Aswad Bella, Revallinda Salsa Dandi Jayusman Ghina Shofi Nabila Hawin, M Huwaida, Nisrina Kharisma Putri, Varra Kusnaedy, Dina Lailita, Ariska M. Hawin Marischa, Diva Muhammad Boma Adichandra Mukti Fajar Mukti Fajar Nur Dewata Mukti Fajar Nur Dewata, Mukti Fajar Nabila Putri, Dhini Nabila, Laela Qotrunnada, Zumar Salma Rahul Kumar Sakir Sakir, Sakir Simon Butt Siska Sari Surya Dewi, Putri