Evy Febryani
Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Analysis of the Influence of Freedom of Expression, Access to Information, and Political Participation on the Protection of Political Rights Fauzan Fauzan; Arief Fahmi Lubis; Evy Febryani; Raihana Raihana
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 2 No. 01 (2024): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v2i01.602

Abstract

This research investigates the intricate interplay between freedom of expression, access to information, political participation, and the protection of political rights in Indonesia through a quantitative analysis. A sample of 1500 respondents from diverse demographics was surveyed, and the data were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The findings reveal strong positive relationships between freedom of expression, access to information, political participation, and the protection of political rights. The measurement model demonstrated robust psychometric properties, and discriminant validity was confirmed. While the model fit was acceptable, ongoing refinement is suggested. The R-Square value indicates that approximately 60.2% of the variance in the protection of political rights can be explained by the selected variables. The study contributes to the understanding of democratic governance in Indonesia, emphasizing the pivotal role of information, expression, and civic engagement in safeguarding political rights.
Comparison of Legal Aspects of Consumer Protection in E-commerce Transactions and TikTok Shop in Indonesia Loso Judijanto; Nuryati Solapari; Asma Karim; Evy Febryani
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v2i02.859

Abstract

Consumer protection in the digital age presents unique challenges and opportunities, particularly in the context of emerging platforms like TikTok Shop. This study undertakes a comparative analysis of the legal aspects of consumer protection in e-commerce transactions and TikTok shops in Indonesia. Through a normative approach, key similarities, differences, challenges, and opportunities are identified, shedding light on the evolving regulatory landscape and its implications for consumers, businesses, and policymakers. Findings highlight the need for adaptive regulation, enhanced enforcement mechanisms, industry collaboration, and consumer empowerment to ensure a fair, transparent, and accountable digital commerce ecosystem.
Hate Speech and Offensive Speech in Indonesian Law, Alignment with the Rabat Plan of Action (RPA) Evy Febryani
The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights (ESLHR)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/eslhr.v4i02.941

Abstract

The regulation of hate speech and offensive speech has become a critical issue within Indonesian law, particularly in the context of expanding digital communication and increasing public discourse on social media platforms. This study aims to examine the normative construction of hate speech and offensive speech in Indonesian legal frameworks and to assess their alignment with the Rabat Action Plan (RPA) through a normative juridical analysis. The research employs doctrinal methods by analyzing statutory provisions, legal principles, and international human rights standards, focusing on the six-part threshold test of the RPA, which includes context, speaker, intent, content or form, extent of dissemination, and likelihood of harm. The findings indicate that Indonesian law demonstrates a strong commitment to maintaining public order and social harmony; however, several legal provisions remain broadly formulated, creating potential overlap between hate speech and offensive speech. The absence of a structured analytical framework may lead to inconsistent interpretation, particularly regarding intent and demonstrable harm. Comparative analysis reveals that while Indonesian regulations share similar objectives with the RPA, greater emphasis on proportionality, contextual assessment, and clear legal thresholds is needed to ensure compatibility with international human rights standards. This study contributes to the discourse on legal harmonization by offering a normative evaluation of speech regulation in Indonesia and highlighting the importance of balancing freedom of expression with the protection of vulnerable groups in the digital era.
Tinjauan Yuridis Implementasi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 5 Tahun 2021 tentang Perizinan Berusaha Berbasis Risiko bagi Pelaku UMKM di Indonesia Temmy Fitriah Alfiany; Evy Febryani; Dwi Saleha; Junaidi Junaidi
Sanskara Hukum dan HAM Vol. 4 No. 03 (2026): Sanskara Hukum dan HAM (SHH)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/shh.v4i03.787

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji implementasi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 5 Tahun 2021 (PP No. 5/2021) tentang Perizinan Usaha Berbasis Risiko di Indonesia, dengan fokus pada dampaknya terhadap Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Peraturan tersebut, yang memperkenalkan sistem klasifikasi berbasis risiko untuk kegiatan usaha, bertujuan untuk menyederhanakan proses perizinan usaha, mengurangi hambatan birokrasi, dan menciptakan lingkungan yang lebih kondusif bagi UMKM. Melalui analisis hukum normatif, penelitian ini mengevaluasi kerangka hukum, implikasi praktis bagi UMKM, serta tantangan potensial dalam implementasi peraturan tersebut. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa meskipun peraturan tersebut menawarkan manfaat signifikan dalam hal efisiensi regulasi dan kepastian hukum, tantangan tetap ada dalam hal desentralisasi, akurasi klasifikasi risiko, dan aksesibilitas digital. Studi ini diakhiri dengan rekomendasi untuk meningkatkan koordinasi antara pemerintah pusat dan daerah, memperkuat infrastruktur digital, serta memastikan penegakan hukum yang konsisten di seluruh wilayah.