Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.092
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Arkus Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Mimbar Hukum Enigma in Law Jurnal Pendekar Nusantara Bhakti Sabha Nusantara Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy IECON: International Economics and Business Conference Teknofile, Jurnal Sistem Informasi
Fadlan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The Paradox of No-Fault Social Insurance: A Normative-Empirical Analysis of Procedural Barriers in Indonesia's Traffic Accident Compensation Scheme Fadlan; E Arinda Chikita
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 8 No. 6 (2025): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v8i6.311

Abstract

Article 28D(1) of Indonesia's 1945 Constitution guarantees legal protection and certainty. Despite Law Number 34 of 1964 establishing a progressive no-fault compensation scheme administered by Jasa Raharja, traffic accident victims frequently face insurmountable administrative barriers. This study employs a mixed normative-empirical methodology in the Barelang Police Resort jurisdiction, Riau Islands. Normative analysis utilized grammatical, historical, systematic, and teleological interpretations of statutory frameworks. The empirical phase integrated stakeholder interviews with a quantitative retrospective cohort study analyzing claim adjudication outcomes, processing durations, and documentation barriers. The statutory framework contains critical gaps. Procedural ambiguities create disproportionate documentation burdens, leading to an empirical 25.5% claim abandonment rate driven heavily by fear of vehicle seizure and civil registration irregularities. Furthermore, the categorical exclusion of single-vehicle accidents fails to account for infrastructure-related causation, violating equal treatment guarantees. Regulatory fragmentation regarding temporal standards results in systematic processing delays, compounded by severe public awareness deficits. In conclusion, the implementation of Law Number 34 of 1964 structurally transforms a theoretical no-fault scheme into a restrictive mechanism privileging legally sophisticated claimants. We propose specific statutory amendments, including integrated inter-institutional coordination mandates and enforceable processing timelines, to align the compensation framework with constitutional mandates.
The Paradox of No-Fault Social Insurance: A Normative-Empirical Analysis of Procedural Barriers in Indonesia's Traffic Accident Compensation Scheme Fadlan; E Arinda Chikita
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 8 No. 6 (2025): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v8i6.311

Abstract

Article 28D(1) of Indonesia's 1945 Constitution guarantees legal protection and certainty. Despite Law Number 34 of 1964 establishing a progressive no-fault compensation scheme administered by Jasa Raharja, traffic accident victims frequently face insurmountable administrative barriers. This study employs a mixed normative-empirical methodology in the Barelang Police Resort jurisdiction, Riau Islands. Normative analysis utilized grammatical, historical, systematic, and teleological interpretations of statutory frameworks. The empirical phase integrated stakeholder interviews with a quantitative retrospective cohort study analyzing claim adjudication outcomes, processing durations, and documentation barriers. The statutory framework contains critical gaps. Procedural ambiguities create disproportionate documentation burdens, leading to an empirical 25.5% claim abandonment rate driven heavily by fear of vehicle seizure and civil registration irregularities. Furthermore, the categorical exclusion of single-vehicle accidents fails to account for infrastructure-related causation, violating equal treatment guarantees. Regulatory fragmentation regarding temporal standards results in systematic processing delays, compounded by severe public awareness deficits. In conclusion, the implementation of Law Number 34 of 1964 structurally transforms a theoretical no-fault scheme into a restrictive mechanism privileging legally sophisticated claimants. We propose specific statutory amendments, including integrated inter-institutional coordination mandates and enforceable processing timelines, to align the compensation framework with constitutional mandates.
Catalyzing Knowledge Diffusion: A Meta-Synthesis of Intellectual Property Frameworks and FDI-Driven Technology Transfer in ASEAN Free Trade Zones Fadlan; E Arinda Chikita
Arkus Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Arkus
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/arkus.v12i1.868

Abstract

The rapid economic integration of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was historically driven by Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). However, the role of Intellectual Property (IP) frameworks in transforming foreign capital into genuine technological transfer remained heavily debated. This study quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated the impact of IP frameworks and institutional quality on FDI-driven knowledge diffusion within ASEAN Free Trade Zones (FTZs). A quantitative meta-analysis and systematic synthesis were conducted utilizing empirical data extracted from nine essential econometric studies. Reported coefficients from diverse regression models were statistically converted into Standardized Mean Differences (SMD) to allow for pooled analysis. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was employed, and heterogeneity was assessed utilizing the I-squared statistic. The study selection process yielded nine foundational manuscripts. Risk of bias assessment indicated high methodological quality. The pooled meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant positive effect of strengthened institutional and IP frameworks on technology transfer proxies (Pooled SMD = 0.46; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.32, 0.60; p < 0.001). Significant heterogeneity was observed (I-squared = 68.4%, p < 0.01). Tabulated findings revealed that FTZs significantly boosted regional innovation indices, though actual absorption depended strictly on local absorptive capacity. In conclusion, robust IP laws and high institutional quality within FTZs strongly suggest a catalytic effect on formal knowledge diffusion. To maximize labor productivity, ASEAN member states must pair strict IP protection with active learning initiatives and dedicated technology transfer incentives.
Co-Authors Abdul Rahman Aras Agussalim Alfin Bakhtiar Tijjang Chikita, E. Arinda E Arinda Chikita Faisal Santiago H.M. Soerya Respationo Ika Novita Sari Kairuddin Karim Lagat Parroha Patar Siadari Laily Washliati Lia Fadjriani Muhammad Sabir Rahman Nicha Suwalla Nuringsih Ramon Nofrial Rinawati Siagian Sianturi, Tony Budianto Silalahi, Dwi Grace Rosalia Sunardi Purwanda Zudan Arif Fakrulloh