Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Studi Perbandingan Politik Islam Al Mawardi dan Ibnu Taimiyyah Serta Relevansinnya Dengan Politik Demokrasi Modern Fazari Zul Hasmi Kanggas; Muhammad Azrul Amirullah; Saipul Nasution; Usamah Abdurrahman; Muhammad Akbar Hilman
Politea : Jurnal Politik Islam Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Digital Governance, Political Ethics, and Social Transformation in Islamic and
Publisher : UIN Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/politea.v9i2.15499

Abstract

The concept of Ahlu al-Halli wa al-‘Aqdi formulated by Al Mawardi in Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah represents an important foundation of classical Islamic political thought concerning leadership selection and governance. This study aims to analyze and critically examine Al Mawardi’s concept of Ahlu al-Halli wa al-‘Aqdi and its relevance to modern democratic politics from the perspective of Ibn Taymiyyah. The research employs a normative juridical and descriptive-analytical approach through the study of classical Islamic political literature and contemporary democratic systems. The findings indicate that Ahlu al-Halli wa al-‘Aqdi functioned as a representative body authorized to appoint and dismiss leaders based on criteria of justice, knowledge, and social influence. However, the mechanism differs significantly from modern democratic institutions such as the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR), the House of Representatives (DPR), and Regional Representative Councils (DPRD), whose members are directly elected by the people through periodic elections. In Al Mawardi’s framework, leadership succession tended to be elitist and limited to certain authoritative groups. From Ibn Taymiyyah’s perspective, the legitimacy of political authority should prioritize public welfare (maslahah) and justice, allowing flexibility in governance systems according to social and political contexts. The study concludes that although the concept of Ahlu al-Halli wa al-‘Aqdi remains relevant as an ethical foundation for leadership and representation, its implementation requires contextual reinterpretation to align with democratic principles, public participation, accountability, and modern constitutional governance.
Analysis of Online Zakat Mechanism Reviewed from the Perspective of Maqashid Sharia (Case Study of BSI Maslahat Surabaya) Teguh Eka Prasetya; Usamah Abdurrahman; Annisa Silviana Yuniar; Amiera Aulia Taftazani
Menulis: Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): Menulis - April
Publisher : PT. Padang Tekno Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59435/menulis.v2i4.1098

Abstract

The development of digital technology has encouraged zakat management institutions, including BSI Maslahat, to provide online zakat services. This study aims to analyze the online zakat mechanism at BSI Maslahat Surabaya and review it based on the perspective of maqashid syariah. This study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. Data was obtained through field research in the form of interviews with BSI Maslahat Surabaya and a literature study on the concept of maqashid syariah. The analysis focused on the suitability of the zakat collection and distribution mechanism with the five aspects of maqashid, namely hifz al-din, hifz al-nafs, hifz al-aql, hifz al-nasl, and hifz al-mal. The results of the study show that the online zakat mechanism at BSI Maslahat Surabaya is generally in line with the principles of maqashid syariah, in terms of ease of payment, distribution of funds to mustahik, transparency of information, empowerment programs, and the security system for fund management. However, improvements in digital literacy and optimization of information delivery are still needed.