Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PROBLEMATIKAN TERJEMAH AL-QUR’AN BAHASA MADURA; Studi KasusTerjemah I‘raban Keterangan Madhurah Atoro’ Lil-Jalālain (TIKMAL) Mursyidi Mursyidi; Moh. Bakir
Nun : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Tafsir di Nusantara Vol 7, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Asosiasi Ilmu Alqur'an dan Tafsir se-Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32495/nun.v7i1.228

Penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa, pertama, pola penerjemahan kitab TIKMAL,yang disusun oleh Forum Mudzakarah Tafser al-Qur’an (FMTQ), yang terdiri dari ulama Madura, menggunakan pola penerjemahan dengan pola I’rāb. Pola i’rāb ini biasa hanya ditemukan pada kitab-kitab tafsir seperti keterangan-keterangan yang berhubungan dengan kata, kalimat, dan kandungan ayat. Keduan, kitab TIKMAL ini ditulis dengan dua aksara yaitu latin dan arab pegon yang masing-masing dipisah, hal ini bertujuan agar masyarakat yang hanya bisa baca salah satu tulisan “Arab Pegon dan Latin ” bisa membacanya. Ketiga, Kitab TIKMAL ini adalah terjemahan dari kitab tafsir al-Jalālain.

Kekuatan dan Batas Judicial Review dalam Arsitektur Hukum Indonesia Mursyidi, Mursyidi
Syura: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/syura.v3i1.387

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia grants judicial review authority to two state institutions: the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court. However, the dualism of this authority has led to potential legal problems in its implementation, both conceptually and practically. This study aims to analyze the mechanism of judicial review within Indonesia’s legal system and to evaluate its effectiveness and consistency in upholding constitutional supremacy. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that the division of judicial review powers between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court creates inefficiencies and the possibility of inconsistent rulings. Additionally, there is ambiguity in the delineation of authority, which may lead to institutional conflicts and weaken constitutional oversight. Based on these findings, the study recommends a restructuring of the judicial review system in Indonesia by consolidating the authority under a single institution—the Constitutional Court. This consolidation is expected to strengthen constitutional oversight, ensure legal certainty, and enhance the effectiveness of the national legal system. The main contribution of this research lies in providing a conceptual and juridical basis for reinforcing the role of the Constitutional Court as the sole authority for judicial review, thereby promoting a more coherent, responsive, and constitutionally grounded legal order in Indonesia

The Dissolution of Political Parties in Indonesia is Viewed from the Constitutional Aspect Mursyidi, Mursyidi
Syura: Journal of Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): February
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/syura.v1i1.24

Democracy is a manifestation of the State of Indonesia. This means that Indonesia always triess to guarantee the rights of its citizens to freedom of association and assembly. This is stated in the state constitution, namely the 1945 Constitution concerning guarantees for human rights. This right is the right to associate and assemble which can be dedicated as a forum for establishing a political party. So in matters of the state, it is always related to the problems of political parties. This political party has a role in determining the direction of policies and goals of a country. The development of political parties can also be a development towards the direction of the country, so it is necessary to have restrictions on the establishment of a political party. Like having to have the same ideology with the ideology of the state. Political parties that are proven to have different ideologies from the state will be dissolved and frozen and in this case the dissolution mechanism has been regulated by the state. This change and suspension is a form of restriction given by the state to guarantee national security and also guarantee the rights of Indonesian citizens.

The Judge in the Islamic Balance Al-Saadi, Arwa Ahmed Hamood; Hafshah, Hafshah; Mostafa, Mostafa; Mursyidi, Mursyidi; Albab, Moh. Ulul
Syura: Journal of Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): August
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/syura.v1i2.101

This academic paper delves into the intricate and multifaceted role of the judge within the context of Islamic jurisprudence. Drawing from the rich and diverse heritage of Islamic legal traditions, the study seeks to illuminate the judge's pivotal position as the embodiment of justice, ethics, and social equilibrium in Muslim-majority societies. It explores the historical evolution of Islamic jurisprudence and its relevance in contemporary legal systems, emphasizing the judge's duty to uphold Islamic law while adapting to the changing demands of modern society. In conclusion, this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the judge's pivotal role in the Islamic legal system and its relevance in the modern world. It underscores the importance of preserving the integrity and independence of the judiciary while adapting to the evolving needs of Muslim-majority societies. Understanding the judge in the Islamic balance is essential for promoting justice, fostering social harmony, and maintaining the principles of Islamic jurisprudence in a contemporary global context.

Peninjauan Kembali dipersimpangan putusan MK No. 34 Tahun 2014 dan SEMA No. 7 Tahun 2014 Mursyidi, Mursyidi
Syura: Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): February
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/syura.v2i1.255

This study explores the legal controversy related to the submission of PK in Indonesia with a focus on the Constitutional Court Decision No. 34 of 2014 and SEMA No. 7 of 2014. The 1945 Constitution provides a legal basis that must be obeyed by all people and state organs. The Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court have different but interrelated authorities in maintaining justice and legal certainty. The Constitutional Court Decision contained in No. 34 of 2014 allows PK more than once, contrary to Article 268 of the Criminal Procedure Code which allows PK only once. The Supreme Court responded to the decision by issuing SEMA No. 7 of 2014 which limits PK to only being submitted once, except in special conditions. The method used in this study is normative juridical, with secondary data as the main source. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively with a descriptive and prescriptive approach based on historical and comparative analysis. The results of the study indicate that the Constitutional Court Decision No. 3 of 2013 emphasizes the aspects of justice and human rights, providing the opportunity for multiple PKs with the condition of novum. However, SEMA No. 7 of 2014 was issued to maintain legal certainty by limiting PK to only one time. This study highlights the importance of the balance between justice and legal certainty in the Indonesian justice system

Penanganan Kasus Asusila Melalui Hukum Adat Bali Diluar Hukum Pidana KUHP Mursyidi, Mursyidi; Anam, Nurul; Ali, Mufti
Syura: Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): August
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/syura.v2i2.294

Indonesia is a nation whose people have diverse tribes, races, religions and customs spread across cities and villages. This diversity is a wealth and potential owned by the Indonesian nation. In community life, law and society are two things that cannot be separated. Ibi ius ibi societas, where there is society, there is law. Therefore, a legal rule is needed to regulate community life in order to achieve public order. These legal rules are written and unwritten. Applicable nationally and regionally, in the field of public law and private law. The purpose of this study is How is the legal process to ensnare perpetrators of immoral cases both under customary law and criminal law based on the Criminal Code in Bali? What is the cause of criminal law based on the Criminal Code not being able to touch immoral cases that occur in Bali. This study uses a qualitative approach with a library method where the data comes from books and articles and related websites. The results show that the legal process for the perpetrators of immoral acts that occurred in Banjar Bia Bali between WL (48 years old) and MJ (60 years old) who came from Sukawati Village was resolved by the village peace judge in Keramas Village because they were legally proven guilty. The reason criminal law cannot touch the Balinese community, especially the wives and husbands of the perpetrators of immoral acts is proven by the absence of complaints or reports to the local police because the Balinese indigenous community believes in the existence of ancestral spirits who are their guides and guides in life.

Impeachment Mechanisms in Indonesia: Safeguarding Democracy through Presidential and Vice-Presidential Removal Mursyidi, Mursyidi; Zaini, Syafiudin Kholiq
Syura: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/syura.v3i2.488

emocracy represents the embodiment of Indonesia’s state system, which upholds popular sovereignty and guarantees the rights of its citizens, including the freedom of association and assembly. These rights are enshrined in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945), which serves as the foundation for the protection of human rights. The freedom to associate and assemble also serves as an essential means for citizens to determine the direction of national leadership, including the election of the President of the Republic of Indonesia. Within the constitutional system, the President holds a central role as both head of state and head of government. However, after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution, significant changes occurred in the President’s position and accountability mechanism. The President is no longer responsible to the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) and cannot be dismissed merely on political grounds or through a vote of no confidence. This study aims to analyze the shift in the President’s position after the constitutional amendments, particularly regarding the impeachment mechanism as stipulated in Articles 7A and 7B of the 1945 Constitution. The research employs a normative legal method with a statute approach and conceptual analysis of legal documents and scholarly literature. The findings reveal that the impeachment mechanism reflects the principle of checks and balances within a modern presidential system. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of constitutional protection, governmental stability, and the rule of law in Indonesia’s democratic practice.

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 7 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search