Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Pledoi Law Jurnal
Makkah HM
Universitas Indonesia Timur
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Role of Mediation and Arbitration in Civil Dispute Resolution Ujang Suratno; Andrew Shady Utama; Sandra Dewi; Makkah HM; Hasyim Mahmud Wantu
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4745

Abstract

Civil dispute resolution is an important aspect of the legal system, aiming to achieve a fair and efficient solution for the parties involved. Mediation and arbitration, as alternatives to out-of-court dispute resolution (ADR), have gained significant popularity in recent years. This systematic literature review aims to examine the role of mediation and arbitration in civil dispute resolution. This study uses a systematic search methodology to identify and analyze relevant studies in various scientific databases. The results of this study conclude that mediation and arbitration are valuable tools for resolving civil disputes. By raising awareness and addressing existing challenges, mediation and arbitration can play a greater role in achieving fair and efficient settlement of civil disputes. Both methods not only reduce the burden on the court, but also increase the participation and satisfaction of the parties to the dispute. Mediation and arbitration provide procedural flexibility that allows for adjustments to the specific context of the dispute, ultimately resulting in better acceptance of the decision. However, the successful implementation of mediation and arbitration is highly dependent on a supportive legal framework and policies that promote its use. Overall, mediation and arbitration are vital components in the modern civil dispute resolution system, with great potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the justice system.
Analyzing the Efficacy of Restorative Justice Practices in Criminal Law Makkah HM; Andrew Shandy Utama; Bucky Wibawa Karya Guna; Andri Kurniawan; Aat Ruchiat Nugraha; Suhardy Suhardy; Ahmad Zain Sarnoto; Alex Irawan Triantho
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 3 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of restorative justice practices in the context of criminal law. Restorative justice is an alternative approach that focuses on restoring relationships between perpetrators, victims, and society through dialogue and out-of-court settlements. With the growing idea that traditional criminal justice systems are often more repressive than rehabilitative, restorative justice offers a new paradigm that emphasizes perpetrator responsibility, victim recovery, and active community involvement. This study uses case study methods and literature reviews to evaluate the extent to which restorative justice practices are able to achieve their main goals, namely reducing recidivism, recovering victims, and reintegrating perpetrators. The results show that, while restorative justice is effective in some contexts, its implementation is often hampered by a lack of understanding, a supportive legal framework, and resistance from traditional legal systems. In conclusion, although restorative justice has great potential in improving the weaknesses of the conventional criminal justice system, further development is needed in policy and application to ensure its success more broadly.
Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemeliharaan (Hak Asuh) Anak Di Bawah Umur Berdasarkan Putusan No.990/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.Mks Makkah HM; Rina Maryana; K. Qanita AB
Pledoi Law Jurnal Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): Pledoi Law Jurnal
Publisher : Pledoi Law Jurnal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Children who are left behind by divorce their parents sometimes have to become victims of the divorce because the children do not understand the divorce of their parents at that time, later when they grow up they will understand what conditions happened to their parents. Apart from the issue of divorce itself, other problems also arise as a result of the divorce being granted, such as cases regarding who has more rights in carrying out hadhanah (care) for children. The research results obtained are based on Case Decision Number 990/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Mks, in the case of child maintenance, the Panel of Judges put forward the principle that prioritizes the issue of the right to maintain children, not simply "who has the most rights" but is "solely for the benefit of the child" which brings more benefits and does not cause damage to the child. It is hoped that parents who have divorced will prioritize their children's rights as much as possible by taking approaches so that the children still feel that the children still come first.   ABSTRAK: Anak yang ditinggal cerai oleh kedua orang tuanya terkadang harus menjadi korban dari perceraian tersebut, nanti ketika beranjak dewasa mereka akan paham kondisi apa yang terjadi terhadap orang tuanya. Timbul pula permasalahan lain selaku akibat dari dikabulkannya perceraian tersebut, semacam kasus tentang siapa yang lebih berhak dalam melaksanakan hadhanah (pemeliharaan) terhadap anak. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh yaitu berdasarkan Putusan Perkara Nomor-990/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Mks, dalam hal pemeliharaan anak Majelis Hakim yang mengemukakan prinsip yang mengedepankan dalam masalah hak pemeliharaan anak bukanlah “semata -mata siapa yang paling berhak” akan tetapi adalah “semata-mata demi kepentingan anak” yang lebih mendatangkan manfaat dan tidak mendatangkan kerusakan bagi si anak. diharapkan bagi kedua orang tua yang telah bercerai sebisa mungkin mengedepankan hak-hak anak mereka dengan melakukan pendekatan-pendekatan agar anak tetap merasa bahwa anak tetap diutamakan.
Co-Authors Aat Ruchiat Nugraha Ahmad Zain Sarnoto Alex Irawan Triantho Andrew Shady Utama Andrew Shandy Utama Andri Kurniawan Bucky Wibawa Karya Guna Hasyim Mahmud Wantu K. Qanita AB Rina Maryana Sandra Dewi Suhardy Suhardy Suratno, Ujang