Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sarwahita : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Gema Wiralodra Jurnal Yustitia Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences (FJAS) Journal of Law and Social Politics
Suratno, Ujang
Universitas Wiralodra
Humanities Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Kedudukan Hukum Hak Ulayat dan Penggunaannya untuk Kepentingan Instansi Suratno, Ujang
Yustitia Vol 1 No 1 (2007): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v1i1.18

Abstract

Hak Ulayat merupakan hak atas tanah yang paling tua yang pernah dipunyai masyarakat hukum adat. Setelah Reformasi bergulir dengan ditandai runtuhnya kekuasaan Orde Baru, maasyarakat daerah mulai menanyakan masalah tanah hak ulayat yang dahulu dikuasai oleh pemerintah maupun swasta dengan dalih untuk kepentingan umum. Penulis mencoba menggunakan dasar pemikiraan Teori Negara Hukum Kesejahteraan untuk menjelaskan kedudukan hak ulayat .
Strategi Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Membangun Negara Yang Adil dan Makmur Suratno, Ujang
Yustitia Vol 1 No 5 (2008): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v1i5.19

Abstract

Since its existence, corruptions IS NOT A NEW THING IN Indonesia. There are a lot of problems faced by Indonesia after corruptions becomes a great problem. The longer time of the corruptions in Indonesia it brings influence in co-opting the government system in Indonesia. Law enforcement dealing to corruptions criminal act has been done, but there is still no improvement of reducing corruption problem, it becomes violent and arbitrary. The effect of corruption is very serious , it affects in every fields of life, such as economy, politic, social and also culture , even worse it affects to humanitarianism, so corruption includes to an extra ordinary criminal. Law enforcement now a days has not yet touched the main cause of corruption, even the law upholders sometimes do not know the strength and weakness, and also chance and obstacle in facing up the problem wether consciously or unconsciously, this conditions is aggravated with bad morality. Therefore the perspective of management strategy in eliminating corruption is trying to find out the solution.
Peranan DPD Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI Perspektif Sosiologis dan Hukum Suratno, Ujang
Yustitia Vol 1 No 7 (2009): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v1i7.20

Abstract

Regional Representatives Council (DPD) is a new state institution in Indonesia's state system. Regional Representatives Council was born on a national agreement to replace the position of regions an factions representatives. In socioantropologist perpective, Regional Representatives Council is intended to accomodate all kinds of local people aspiration that are not conveyed through the political parties. There for, the role of DPD should be recognized and felt by the people in their region. However, the fact shows that Regional Representatives Council is lees fuction to accomodate regional aspiration. This condition caannot be separated from to juridical aspect, Regional Representatives Council (DPD) is only assigned to porpose and discuss certain bills for certain aspect, and also to keep eyes on the implementation of the law, without being given a role to take decision.
Kriminalisasi Kebijakan Pejabat Negara Dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suratno, Ujang
Yustitia Vol 2 No 1 (2011): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v2i1.22

Abstract

In doing its duty, the government has power related to : (1) the making of law and policies under the law (2) define beschikking which is individual, concrete and final (3) the real and active administration actions, and (4) freis ermessen, wether beleid or dicretion. All actions above are included in state administration action. But, that can be categorized as a corruption when there is materele wederechtelijkheid indication, detournament de povouir and abus de droit.
PERLINDUNGAN HAK ATAS KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL BATIK TRADISIONAL PAOMAN DALAM MENINGKATKAN EKONOMI MASYARAKAT INDRAMAYU Suratno, Ujang
Yustitia Vol 4 No 1 (2018): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v4i1.35

Abstract

Indonesia has some varieties of ethnic groups that are rich in diversity of intellectual property, there are so many products produced by society. The society creations especially created by the community are assorted, one of them is Paoman Batik. Thre are two kinds of Paoman Batik, those are contemporary and traditional, which is distinguished by its motives, processes, creators. The Paoman Traditional Batik is well-known to the public than contemporary. This research has supported the creators or copyright holders to get higher benefits, both the benefits of moral and economic rights. The main problem is, first, is the current intellectual property rights regime able to provide the foundation for the protection of Paoman Traditional Batik? Second, is the UNESCO's determination that stated if batik is a world heritage, non-object from Indonesia, can be used as the foundation to charge the economic rights of Paoman Traditional Batik? Third, is it possible for Traditional Batik, including Paoman Traditional Batik, to be carried out through other regimes, in addition to the intellectual property regime? Fourth, how is the effect of Paoman Traditional Batik Registered at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of Indonesia on the Progress of Indramayu society? The research method used is descriptive specification, by using juridical empirical approach, which focus on secondary research consisting of legal materials, both primary, secondary and tertiary. However it is supported by primary data generated from field research through in-depth interview and survey techniques. The analysis used is descriptive analysis. The results of the study show that intellectual property rights that is copyright cannot be made as the foundation of protection against the creation of society that have traditional and communal motives, including the Paoman Tradsional Batik. The establishment of Batik by UNESCO as a non-object world heritage from Indonesia has increased the moral rights of Indonesia, but it also cannot be established as the foundation for restoring economic rights when there is a misappropriation. Another alternative to intellectual property is through the Sui Generis regime, which specifically addresses the protection of community rights, including intellectual property rights.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN YANG DIKENAKAN TINDAKAN PENYITAAN SEPEDA MOTOR OLEH LEMBAGA PEMBIAYAAN FIDUSIA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG - UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Suratno, Ujang
Yustitia Vol 3 No 1 (2017): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v3i1.39

Abstract

Keterbatasan transportasi umum membuat sebagian masyarakat lebih memilih untuk membawa kendaraan pribadi dalam melaksanakan aktivitas sehari - hari seperti sepeda motor. Pembelian sepeda motor yang mudah didukung dengan hadirnya lembaga pembiayaan konsumen dengan jaminan fidusia sebagai prosesnya, membuat masyarakat mudah untuk membuat perjanjian dengan lembaga pembiayaan. Walaupun perjanjian yang dilakukan adalah perjanjian baku yang telah dibuat oleh lembaga pembiayaan konsumen dalam bentuk formulir dimana konsumen hanya tinggal menandatangani perjanjian tersebut tanpa mengetahui akibat jika melakukan wanprestasi seperti keterlambatan pembayaran angsuran. Dalam hal ini menjadi permasalahan ketika lembaga pembiayaan konsumen kerap kali melakukan tindakan penyitaan atas sepeda motor yang di angsur oleh konsumen yang biasanya dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga yang diberikan kuasa oleh lembaga pembiayaan konsumen, yaitu melalui jasa debt collector. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analistis. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Data yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan yang berupa peraturan perundang - undangan, buku, jurnal, dan media elektronik. Penelitian ini terdiri dari 2 (dua) hasil yaitu Pertama, Tindakan lembaga pembiayaan konsumen yang melakukan penyitaan sepeda motor, merupakan tindakan yang tidak sah karena klausula yang menyatakan hak-hak lembaga pembiayaan untuk melakukan tindakan tersebut adalah batal demi hukum sebagaimana diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 18 Ayat (3) UU 8/1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Kedua, tindakan proses eksekusi yang harus dilakukan satu – satunya cara yaitu dengan cara mengajukan gugatan perdata ke Pengadilan Negeri melalui proses hukum acara yang normal hingga turunnya putusan pengadilan. Inilah pilihan yang prosedural hukum formil agar dapat menjaga keadilan dan penegakan terhadap hukum materiil yang dikandungnya.
PENEMUAN HUKUM HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 21/PUU-XII/2014.MK KASUS PROYEK BIOMEDIASI PT.CHEVRON BACHTIAR ABDUL FATAH Suratno, Ujang
Yustitia Vol 4 No 2 (2018): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v4i2.48

Abstract

Judicial authority in Indonesia is carried out by a Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court which has the authority to examine laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and decide on the authority dispute of state institutions whose authority is granted by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The Constitutional Court in examining the Law against the 1945 Constitution became a polemic related to the prejudicial object which was finally answered through the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014. The Constitutional Court granted part of the application for corruption convictions in the case of PT Chevron Bachtiar's Abdul Fatah biomediation project, one of which examined the prejudicial object provisions which were polemic, especially after the South Jakarta District Court's prejudicial has canceled the status of suspect Commissioner Budi Gunawan (BG) by the KPK. This study is a legal research using a normative juridical approach and descriptive analytical research specifications. The data used in this study are secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data obtained through library studies and field research in the form of legislation, books, journals, and authoritative electronic media. The results of this study are 2 (two) explanations, namely First, Constitutional Court Judges have made legal inventions by providing interpretations and limitations on what can be the object of prejudicial in criminal procedural law by testing it against the constitution and seeing whether the KUHAP Articles tested are contradictory with constitutional rights. Secondly, the Constitutional Court uses several interactive techniques used by member judges in decision number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014. In the joint decision, the judges used Authentic, Systematic, Grammatical, Historical, Extensively and sociological interpretation techniques. This can be seen in the decision of point one stating a phrase which means interpreting the law using grammatical techniques
ANALISIS PERBEDAAN PENGATURAN ANTARA UNDANG - UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PATEN DAN KETENTUAN TRIPs AGREEMENT TERHADAP PERJANJIAN LISENSI PATEN Suratno, Ujang
Yustitia Vol 3 No 2 (2017): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v3i2.56

Abstract

The arrangement of patent license agreements regulated in Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents is the result of the ratification of the TRIPs Agreement as an Agreement on Aspects of Intellectual Property Related to Trade Policy or the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. However, problems arise when the provisions of the patent license agreement regulated in Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents and TRIPs Agreement have many interpretations and harm one party in their implementation. Therefore the author intends to conduct an analysis of the differences in patent license agreement arrangements in Law No. 13 of 2016 and TRIPs Agreement and the impact resulting from the different arrangements in Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents with TRIPs Agreement related to patent licensing agreements. This study is a legal research using a normative juridical approach and descriptive analytical research specifications. The data used in this study are secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data obtained through library studies and field research in the form of legislation, books, journals, and electronic media. The results of this study are divided into two, namely First, the factor in the differences in patent licensing arrangements in the Patent and Trips Agreement Law is the consequence of ratification which requires that international agreements be accommodated by following Indonesia's national interests and not violating the laws and regulations above. Second, the existence of two different arrangements relating to patent licensing agreements causes many interpretations in practice to lead to patent licensing agreements that contain monopolistic practices towards license recipients, so that agreements become null and void because they do not fulfil objective legal requirements, namely halal causality.
ARAH PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM NASIONAL DALAM MENGHADAPI ERA REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0 Suratno, Ujang
Yustitia Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v5i1.65

Abstract

Indonesia has some varieties of ethnic groups that are rich in diversity of intellectual property, there are so many products produced by society. The society creations especially created by the community are assorted, one of them is Paoman Batik. Thre are two kinds of Paoman Batik, those are contemporary and traditional, which is distinguished by its motives, processes, creators. The Paoman Traditional Batik is well-known to the public than contemporary. This research has supported the creators or copyright holders to get higher benefits, both the benefits of moral and economic rights. The main problem is, first, is the current intellectual property rights regime able to provide the foundation for the protection of Paoman Traditional Batik? Second, is the UNESCO's determination that stated if batik is a world heritage, non-object from Indonesia, can be used as the foundation to charge the economic rights of Paoman Traditional Batik? Third, is it possible for Traditional Batik, including Paoman Traditional Batik, to be carried out through other regimes, in addition to the intellectual property regime? Fourth, how is the effect of Paoman Traditional Batik Registered at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of Indonesia on the Progress of Indramayu society? The research method used is descriptive specification, by using juridical empirical approach, which focus on secondary research consisting of legal materials, both primary, secondary and tertiary. However it is supported by primary data generated from field research through in-depth interview and survey techniques. The analysis used is descriptive analysis. The results of the study show that intellectual property rights that is copyright cannot be made as the foundation of protection against the creation of society that have traditional and communal motives, including the Paoman Tradsional Batik. The establishment of Batik by UNESCO as a non-object world heritage from Indonesia has increased the moral rights of Indonesia, but it also cannot be established as the foundation for restoring economic rights when there is a misappropriation. Another alternative to intellectual property is through the Sui Generis regime, which specifically addresses the protection of community rights, including intellectual property rights.
SISTEM PENDAFTARAN MEREK MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG MEREK DAN IMPLIKASINYA PADA MEREK YANG BELUM TERDAFTAR Ujang Suratno
Gema Wiralodra Vol. 7 No. 1 (2016): Gema Wiralodra
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Hak atas Merek adalah hak eksklusif yang diberikan oleh negara kepada pemilik Merek yang terdaftar untuk jangka waktu tertentu dengan menggunakan sendiri Merek tersebut atau memberikan izin kepada pihak lain untuk menggunakannya. Menurut Undang-Undag No. 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek, merek ialah tanda yang dapat ditampilkan secara grafis berupa gambar, logo, nama, kata, huruf, angka, susunan warna, dalam bentuk 2 (dua) dimensi dan/atau 3 (tiga) dimensi, suara, hologram, atau kombinasi dari 2 (dua) atau lebih unsur tersebut untuk membedakan barang dan/ atau jasa yang diproduksi oleh orang atau badan hukum dalam kegiatan perdagangan barang dan/ atau jasa. Pokok persoalan dari riset ini adalah bagaimana UU No. 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek mengatur tentang pendaftaran merek, bagaimana sitem pendaftaran yang dianut UU No. 15 Tahaun 2001, bagaimana impikasi bagi merek-merek yang belum terdaftar menurut UU No. 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek, dan bagaimana bila terjadi pelanggaran terhadap Merek menurut UU No. 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan skripsi ini adalah metode yuridis normatif. Sedangkan untuk data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah metode normatif kualitatif, dimana paparan analisis bersifat preskriptif. Bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap pemilik merek yang belum terdaftar menurut undang-undang No. 15 tahun 2001 tentang Merek, pemilik merek tidak terdaftar dapat mengajukan pembatalan merek dengan alasan sebagaimana dimaksud Pasal 4 yang berisi merek tidak dapat didaftar atas dasar permohonan yang diajukan oleh pemohon yang beritikad tidak baik, memberikan perlindungan hukum semua berdasarkan pendaftaran dengan tujuan mencapai kepastian hukum. Dari hal tersebut kepastian hukum baru tercapai setelah melalui masa pendaftaran dan masa daluwarsa gugatan pembatalan yang memakan waktu lama dan biaya yang besar, sehingga hal ini justru menjadi penghambat iklim usaha di Indonesia bagi masyarakat Indonesia sendiri yang notabene belum memiliki pengetahuan tentang hukum dan kesadaran hukum yang baik. Dan Akibat hukum perlindungan hukum terhadap pemilik merek yang belum terdaftar menurut undang-undang No. 20 tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, yaitu pemakai merek tersebut belum mendapatkan kepastian hukum bahwa pemakai merek tersebut adalah pemegang hak atas merek, dan orang lain ataupun badan hukum lain tidak boleh menggunakan merek tersebut untuk barang-barang sejenis. Kata Kunci: System Pendaftaran Merek, Belum Terdaftar
Co-Authors Agus Wibowo Andrew Shady Utama Didi Nursidi Effendi, Mohammad Sofwan Faqih, Achmad Hasyim Mahmud Wantu Iman Cahyanto Linda Ika Mayasari, Linda Ika Makkah HM Sandra Dewi Soraya, Evitha Suparno