Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL-Daulah Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities
Nurul Insi Syahruddin
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Presidential Inauguration: Pertanggungjawaban Presiden Indonesia Dalam Prosedur dan Materi Sumpah Jabatan Winda Sari; Fitra Arsil; Nurul Insi Syahruddin; Desi Fitriyani
Al-Daulah : Journal of Criminal Law and State Administration Law Vol 12 No 2 (2023): (December)
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Tatanegara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/ad.vi.41577

Abstract

This article examines the validity and accountability of Indonesian’s President based on the procedures and content of the office’s oath. The research method used is doctrinal, with a legislative approach and a constitutional comparison of fifty countries in the world that adhere to the presidential system of government. The results shows normatively, the authority to inaugurate the president is given to the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) based on Article 9 of the 1945 Constitution. However, in practice, MPR doesn’t inaugurate the president because it only witnesses the president reciting the oath. Nevertheless, the practice of inauguration is still valid. A comparison of fifty countries shows a trend of the president taking the oath before parliament with the alternative of taking the oath before the Supreme Court (MA) if the MPR is absent. This trend is also applied in Indonesia, but ideally swearing before the Supreme Court is no longer relevant in Indonesia. Seeing the coherence and logical consequences of the president's relationship in formal accountability is closer to the Constitutional Court, in this case as a priveligiatum forum for impeachment events. Thus, the procedure for swearing in the president is more appropriate in front of the MPR, witnessed by the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court. For the oath content , although it is not explicitly stated to whom, the moral responsibility of the president is still addressed to the people as the mandate giver.
Masa Jabatan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden: Penambahan Pengaturan pada Keadaan Darurat dan Sirkulasi Periodisasi Desi Fitriyani; Fitra Arsil; Winda Sari; Nurul Insi Syahruddin
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i2.7773

Abstract

This paper departs from the problematic arrangements for the term of office of the president and vice president that have been regulated in Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The article has not accommodated the regulation of the term of office if the country is in a state of emergency and leaves a question regarding the possibility of re-election of the president and vice president who have been elected previously. The purpose of this research is, first, to provide an analysis of the need to regulate the term of office of the president and vice president when the country is in a state of emergency and second, to analyze the need for changes in the circulation of periodicity and tightening of the norms. The type of research used is normative legal research using conceptual and comparative constitutional approaches. The results of the research show that reformulation of the regulation of the term of office of the president and vice president is needed on 2 (two) matters. First, the provisions regarding the term of office of the president and vice president if the country is in a state of emergency which is also carried out by several countries. The urgency of this arrangement can be seen from the experience of emergencies that have occurred in Indonesia. Secondly, it is necessary to circulate periodization and tighten arrangements regarding the possibility of re-election of the president and/or vice president. For accountability, the re-election of the president and/or vice president should only apply if done consecutively. The tightening is intended to close the space for misinterpretation of the existing provisions that the constitution has opened the opportunity for the president and/or vice president to serve more than 2 (two) periods if the partner is a different person.
Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Penegakan Hukum Kasus Investasi Ilegal di Indonesia Nurul Insi Syahruddin; Topo Santoso; Desi Fitriyani; Winda Sari
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.5.1.8572.942-951

Abstract

Tulisan ini dilatarbelakangi oleh adanya pro kontra terkait penerapan konsep keadilan restoratif dalam penegakan hukum kasus investasi ilegal di Indonesia. Pada tulisan ini akan mengkaji pengaturan dan upaya aparat penegak hukum serta penerapan restorative justice dalam penegakan hukum kasus investasi ilegal di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Regulasi berkaitan dengan investasi ilegal diatur pada Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998, Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007, dan Keputusan Anggota Dewan Komisioner OJK Nomor KEP-72/D.04/2021. Lembaga yang berwenang di sektor keuangan dalam hal ini OJK melalui SWI tidak memiliki kewenangan untuk menindaklanjuti kasus investasi ilegal selain dari pemblokiran terhadap situs/website/aplikasi sehingga hanya menyampaikan laporan informasi ke Bareskrim Polri. Sementara itu, Keadilan Restoratif dapat diterapkan dalam penegakan hukum kasus investasi ilegal di Indonesia dengan mempertimbangkan instrumen hukum yang berlaku, tujuan, dan kendala terkait. Namun, penerapannya harus memperoleh persetujuan dari korban. Penerapan keadilan restoratif dalam penegakan hukum kasus investasi ilegal memerlukan upaya optimal dalam penelusuran pelaku, baik pelaku utama maupun pelaku lain yang terlibat, melalui koordinasi antara Satgas Waspada Investasi dan Badan Cyber Nasional untuk mencegah pihak-pihak lain yang kembali membuka penawaran investasi ilegal. Apabila berlanjut pada tahap ajudikasi atau penuntutan, restitusi dapat dilakukan dengan melibatkan Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.
Personal Data Protection Violations By Fintech Lending in Indonesia Nurul Insi Syahruddin; Eva Achjani Zulfa
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May-June 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i4.414

Abstract

The development of increasingly modern technology has changed the pattern of human behavior and work methods, which were initially conventional and then digitalized, one of which is marked by the presence of financial technology (fintech) lending. The rise of fintech lending development also has a negative impact, one of which is in terms of processing the personal data of fintech lending users. Hence, the Financial Services Authority formed POJK 10/2022. In connection with this, the PDP Law has also come into force in Indonesia. This paper aims to look at personal data protection violations by fintech lending, considering that two institutions have the authority to handle these violations. The method used is doctrinal legal research. The approach used is the statute approach. The results showed that to supervise fintech lending, it is necessary to classify its position first. If fintech lending is an LPBBTI organizer, it is supervised by OJK. Meanwhile, if fintech lending is the controller of personal data, it is supervised by the PDP Authority. As for reports or complaints of allegations and/or violations of personal data protection committed by fintech lending; examination and investigation of complaints of alleged violations of personal data protection; and imposition of administrative sanctions for violations of personal data protection by fintech lending are the authority of the PDP Authority, not OJK.
Co-Authors Desi Fitriyani Eva Achjani Zulfa Fitra Arsil Topo Santoso Winda Sari