Rachim, Kania Venisa
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Omnibus Law dalam Konstitusi Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, dan Filipina Rachim, Kania Venisa; Sagala, Christo Sumurung Tua; Mulyono, Eddy
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i1.6485

Abstract

The Omnibus Law is often discussed and debated, especially in its implementation in Indonesia. Omnibus Law is considered as a solution to make legislation more efficient, Omnibus Law is something new in the formation of legislation in Indonesia. Previously, the Omnibus Law was often used in the common law legal system, and several civil law countries have also implemented the Omnibus Law. In this study, the authors examine the United States and the Philippines. The concept of the Omnibus Law is not only used for one type of law but has penetrated into other sectoral laws. In the Philippines, since 2003 the Omnibus Law has been enacted as a method for forming legislation. It is different from the United States, which has implemented the Omnibus Law since 1850. This research refers to a comparison of the Omnibus Law in the Philippines because the Philippines is a country in the Southeast Asia region just like Indonesia and adheres to a legal system that combines common law and civil law which does not very different from Indonesia, further comparison with the United States Omnibus Law, because the United States is also one of the countries that is the mecca of world law. This study uses normative legal research, using secondary data which is processed using qualitative techniques. This study uses a comparison of two countries which makes this research different from other research related to the Omnibus Law, with the aim of examining the position of the Omnibus Law in Indonesia and making comparisons with the United States and the Philippines.
The Problem of Filing for Bankruptcy in Indonesian Law: Should the Insolvency Test Mechanism be Applied? Fahamsyah, Ermanto; Taniady, Vicko; Saputra, Ramadhan Dwi; Rachim, Kania Venisa; Wijaya, Glenn
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 7 Issue 1 (2024) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10079

Abstract

The resolution of bankruptcy disputes in Indonesia presents significant challenges due to the ease with which bankruptcy can be filed against debtors, even if they are capable of continuing their business operations and repaying their debts to creditors. This issue arises from the provisions of Article 2, paragraph (1) of Law 37/2004, which stipulate only two requirements for declaring bankruptcy: the existence of a past due debt and the presence of at least two creditors. This paper aims to examine the problems associated with bankruptcy dispute resolution in Indonesia and to propose the implementation of an insolvency test mechanism as a prerequisite before a Commercial Court judge can issue a bankruptcy ruling. Additionally, the study offers a comparative analysis of the insolvency test mechanisms employed in several countries, including the Netherlands, Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Utilizing a doctrinal approach, this legal research analyzes primary and secondary literature by reviewing laws and regulations pertinent to the issues at hand. The findings of this study suggest that adopting an insolvency test is a crucial policy for the bankruptcy law framework in Indonesia. The implementation of such a test could prevent the bankruptcy of debtors who are still capable of fulfilling their financial obligations. Consequently, there is a need to revise Law 37/2004 to incorporate a legal instrument for the insolvency test.
Rekonseptualisasi Pembentukan Pengadilan Agraria di Indonesia: Upaya Perlindungan Hak Warga Negara Atas Tanah Rachim, Kania Venisa; Taniady, Vicko; Saputra, Ramadhan Dwi
Journal of Studia Legalia Vol. 3 No. 02 (2022): Journal Of Studia Legalia
Publisher : FKPH Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61084/jsl.v3i02.30

Abstract

Polemik penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Indonesia menjadi permasalahan serius. Banyaknya jalur penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan mengakibatkan kerap terjadinya putusan yang tumpang tindih, lamanya proses pengadilan yang tidak mengedepankan asas sederhana, cepat, dan biaya ringan dalam penyelesaian sengketa, serta hakim yang masih belum optimal dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan karena hanya mendasarkan pada kebenaran formil daripada kebenaran materiil dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan. Artikel ini mencoba untuk mengkaji pengadilan agraria sebagai upaya penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan yang lebih optimal. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan perbandingan negara di Australia khususnya di Queensland dan New South Wales serta negara Skotlandia, artikel ini akan menawarkan gagasan pembentukan pengadilan agraria. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengadilan agraria di Queensland, New South Wales, dan Skotlandia mampu menjadi media penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan yang optimal. Gagasan pengadilan agraria sejatinya telah tertuang dalam Pasal 60, 61, dan 82 RUU Pertanahan dengan menempatkan pengadilan agraria di bawah pengadilan umum dan menggunakan hukum acara perdata. Melihat hal tersebut, perlu adanya upaya untuk merekonseptualisasi pengadilan agraria dengan menempatkan pengadilan agraria di bawah Mahkamah Agung, melakukan revisi RUU Pertanahan, dan membentuk Hukum Acara Pertanahan. Selain itu, perlu adanya penguatan mekanisme rekrutmen hakim khususnya pada hakim pengadilan agraria.
Euthanasia In Indonesia: Laws, Human Rights, And Medical Perspectives Ohoiwutun, Y. A. Triana; Taniady, Vicko; Lutfian, Lutfian; Rachim, Kania Venisa; Putri, Natasya Aulia
LAW REFORM Vol 20, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v20i2.63813

Abstract

Euthanasia remains a contentious issue in Indonesia, where it is currently prohibited by law, creating significant challenges in balancing human rights, legal standards, and medical ethics. This research explores the legal framework, human rights considerations, and medical perspectives surrounding euthanasia in Indonesia, with a comparative analysis of practices in the Netherlands. Employing a normative legal research methodology, it utilizes legislative analysis, case studies, and comparative approaches to examine the regulatory gaps and societal implications of euthanasia in Indonesia. The findings reveal that while active euthanasia is explicitly criminalized under Indonesian law, passive euthanasia occurs discreetly within society, reflecting a legal and ethical gray area. Comparatively, the Netherlands' regulated approach provides valuable insights into balancing patient autonomy and societal ethics. This study concludes that Indonesia could benefit from legalizing passive euthanasia under stringent conditions, aligned with human rights principles and cultural values. This legalization would require robust regulatory frameworks, including judicial oversight and ethical guidelines, to ensure accountability and safeguard vulnerable groups. The findings underscore the urgency of harmonizing legal, human rights, and medical perspectives to address this complex issue while respecting Indonesia's unique socio-cultural context.