Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Putri, Windy Virdinia
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Perampasan Aset dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dari Perspektif Keadilan Fuadi, Gumilang; Putri, Windy Virdinia; Raharjo, Trisno
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 5, No 1 (2024): March
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jphk.v5i1.19163

Abstract

Money laundering is a crime that harms the public interest, causes economic instability in a country, and is more dangerous than corruption because tracking money flow from money laundering will be more difficult. When considering the impact, asset forfeiture is vital since it employs a "follow the money" strategy. This study reviews asset forfeiture in money laundering from the perspective of justice. This study is a normative or doctrinal research, also called dogmatic research, with a conceptual and statutory approach. The study shows that asset forfeiture in money laundering has been regulated in Indonesia as criminal forfeiture based on the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code, civil forfeiture, and administrative forfeiture based on the PPTPPU Law. However, in its regulation and implementation, there are still legal loopholes that criminals can use to hide the proceeds of their crimes, so it has not provided a sense of justice and is detrimental to the state and society as victims of money laundering. Based on the perspective of justice rooted in the principle of fundamental justice, crime should not benefit the perpetrators. This perspective underlies the need to expand the scope of asset forfeiture arrangements, especially civil/in rem forfeiture, by reformulating the provisions in the PPTPPU Law. Furthermore, broadening coverage can be achieved by enacting laws that govern asset forfeiture. This legislation should encompass not only assets held in the user accounts of financial service providers but also all assets connected to criminal activity. Protecting good faith third parties is necessary to enhance the society and state's sense of fairness.
RES IPSA LOQUITUR: APPLICATION IN PRODUCT LIABILITY Putri, Windy Virdinia; Muhammad, Danang Wahyu
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 8 Nomor 1 September 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v8i1.1255

Abstract

Consumers who experience loss, injury, or death due to a damaged or defective product can claim compensation. However, the difficulty of proof is a scourge for consumers. In law, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was introduced, which in English means that things speak for itself. Based on the doctrine, the law presumes a presumption of negligence which can then be applied to the reverse burden of proof. This study examines the principle of product responsibility in the Consumer Protection Act and the application of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine in product liability. This research is normative research using a conceptual approach and a statute approach. This study found that the principle of product liability in the Consumer Protection Act contains two principles: first, the presumption of negligence, and second, the presumption of liability principle with the burden of proof reversed. In line with the consumer interest-oriented doctrine, res ipsa loquitur also contains the presumption of negligence followed by the presumption of liability principle. The application of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine in product liability is found in 2 things: first as a principle and second as a means of evidence in civil procedural law which can be enforced through evidence of a presumption concluded by a judge.
The Criminal Punishment of LGBTQ: A Comparative Study of Nigerian and Indonesian Laws Putri, Windy Virdinia; Fuadi, Gumilang; Susila, Muh. Endrio
Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): September 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/aclj.v4i3.28217

Abstract

This study aims to compare the punishment for LGBTQ in Nigeria and Indonesia so the similarities and also the differences between the two legal systems can be drawn. This research is normative research using a comparison method. This study found that: First, there are similarities in the adopted legal systems, namely they both adhere to colonial heritage law, customary law, and Islamic law (Sharia). Regarding Sharia Law, the Sharia penal law adopted in the northern states of Nigeria and through Sharia Regional Regulation in parts of Indonesia, namely Aceh Province based on Special Autonomy, allows the province to form regional regulations based on Islamic Law (Sharia). Furthermore, there are similarities in terms of punishment based on Sharia punishment for Nigeria and Indonesia, namely that they both apply to cane, except for male sexual intercourse is punishable by stoning to death based on Nigeria Sharia punishment. Second, there are differences in the prosecution of LGBTQ people based on applicable national law. In Nigeria, based on the Criminal Act, anyone who has sexual intercourse with the same sex or with an animal or allows a man to have intercourse with another man or with a woman through anal intercourse is convicted of a crime and punished with imprisonment for 14 years. In Indonesia, based on the current Criminal Code, it only prohibits homosexual acts between an adult and a child of the same sex. In other words, the actions of two or more adult men cannot be prosecuted by criminal law, and the perpetrators cannot be punished, including if the "victims" are adults while the perpetrators are still children. Then in the 2023 Criminal Code, same-sex fornication requires it to be carried out publicly or published as pornographic content or by force. On the contrary, homosexual behavior (between 2 adults) without coercion (with consensus between the two) is not seen as a crime.
Mengkaji Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi pada Tindak Pidana Ketenaganukliran dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Fuadi, Gumilang; putri, windy virdinia; prasetyoningsih, nanik
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 21, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v21i1.1081

Abstract

Abstrak Korporasi memegang peranan penting dalam era globalisasi saat ini, termasuk peran korporasi dalam pembangunan dan pemanfaatan energi nuklir. Namun demikian, tidak jarang korporasi melakukan unfair business yang tidak hanya merugikan suatu negara dan konsumen, tetapi juga dapat dikategorikan sebagai tindak pidana sehingga perlu dimintakan pertanggungjawaban pidana. Artikel ini akan mengkaji permasalahan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi pada tindak pidana ketenaganukliran dihubungkan dengan pembaruan hukum pidana Indonesia. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian normatif atau doktriner dengan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Temuan dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan terdapat kelemahan pengaturan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana ketenaganukliran yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1997. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini pasca pembaruan Hukum Pidana Indonesia melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, korporasi menjadi subjek tindak pidana dan dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawaban pada tindak pidana ketenaganukliran. Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Nuklir, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia 
Res Ipsa Loquitur: Evidence in Civil Law and Islamic Law; Viewed from a doctrinal point of view putri, windy virdinia; Ichsan, Muchammad; Prasetyoningsih, Nanik
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i2.4409

Abstract

In cases of suspected medical malpractice, it is tough to prove that there is an element of negligence because access to evidence is within or under the perpetrator's control, making it difficult for the victim to access it. In the legal field, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was introduced, which makes it easier for victims to prove who is guilty by showing indirect evidence, namely evidence of a fact or several facts from which a reasonable conclusion can be drawn. This research examines the application of res ipsa loquitur in terms of doctrine, civil evidence law, and Islamic law. This research is a literature study using a normative approach that refers to civil evidence law and Islamic law provisions. The legal analysis used is a conceptual, comparative and case study approach. This research found that applying res ipsa loquitur in judicial practice, as long as it is not regulated in procedural law, is a principle that becomes a source for judges to find the law. In civil evidence law, res ipsa loquitur can be implemented through presumptive evidence concluded by the judge. Meanwhile, in Islamic law, there are dalil (instructions) for qarinah, which are equated with presumptive evidence, so that res ipsa loquitur, which can be enforced through presumptive evidence, can also be enforced through qarinah evidence.
Co-Authors Danang Wahyu Muhammad Fuadi, Gumilang Muchammad Ichsan Nanik Prasetyoningsih Susila, Muh. Endrio Trisno Raharjo