Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Exploring Diverse Madhhabs' Perspectives on Wearing a Veil among Female Students Nurdin, Roswati; Dahlan, Mohd Akram bin Dato Dahaman; Rajab; Kamal, Latri; Thalhah
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 6 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.41323

The increasing prevalence of veiling among female students is requiring urgent examination. Therefore, this study analyzes veiling during prayer, emphasizing four madhhabs to show varying perspectives and implications for student populations in Ambon State Islamic Institute. A comparative analysis of legal principles is adopted to integrate sociological perspectives using an interdisciplinary approach. Data collection includes interviews, documentation, and bibliographic studies, with emphasis on the influential novel turāś (classic book). The results show that there are three main issues, namely concerns regarding prostration perfection in hadith, debates on mouth and nose closure during prayer, and discussions on intimate body part boundaries for women. In addition, Jumhūr Ulamā (the Majority of Scholars) from al-Shāfi'ī, Hanafī, and Mālikī madhhab concur on visibility necessities in specific situations. Veiling is recommended during prayer unless there is concern for slander. In this context, students' awareness of feminist jurisprudence is stated, advocating for a nuanced understanding beyond a singular perspective. Veiling practices should also be comprehended during prayer among Muslims to urge respect for diverse Islamic opinions. This study reports the urgency of addressing the multifaceted issue and advocates for a comprehensive perspective.

RELIGIOUS MODERATION IN COMPARATIVE MADHHAB CURRICULUM: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF IAIN AMBON AND UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR Nurdin, Roswati; Musgamy, Awaliyah; Thalhah; Ulath, Sanusi
Al-Risalah VOLUME 24 NO 2, NOPEMBER (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.51924

This study aims to examine how religious moderation values are manifested in the curriculum of Comparative Fiqh study programs at IAIN Ambon and UIN Alauddin Makassar. It focuses on understanding how these values are embedded in the program’s vision and implemented across four dimensions: Ideological, Document, Process, and Outcome. This qualitative research uses a case study approach, analyzing documents such as institutional strategic plans, program curricula, and reports from IAIN Ambon and UIN Alauddin Makassar. Interviews with faculty members and program administrators were conducted to gain insights into the practical implementation of religious moderation within the curriculum. The data was analyzed thematically. The study found that both institutions incorporate religious moderation values, including tolerance (tasamuh), compassion (tarahum), cooperation (taawun), and harmony (rukun) into their Comparative Fiqh curricula. These values are reflected in the institutions’ visions, emphasizing multiculturalism and universal Islamic principles. However, the integration of these values varies slightly between the two universities, influenced by their distinct local contexts. This research provides original insights into how religious moderation is integrated into Islamic higher education curricula in Indonesia, specifically within Comparative Fiqh programs. It bridges the gap between Islamic educational theory and practice, offering new empirical evidence on the incorporation of moderation in curriculum development. The findings have significant implications for Islamic education policy, curriculum design, and teacher training, encouraging the integration of religious moderation values in educational practices to foster inclusive, tolerant, and peaceful academic environments.

From Certification to Consumption: Shariah-Compliant Postmarket Halal Assurance Thalhah; Hamizar, Arizal; Hunsouw, M. Taib; Roup, Mu'min
Hikmatuna : Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Hikmatuna: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, December 2024
Publisher : UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/hikmatuna.v10i2.9042

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the regulatory framework in ensuring the halal status of products in Indonesia during the postmarket phase. The primary focus is to evaluate the role of Halal Product Assurance (Jaminan Produk Halal/JPH) supervisors in maintaining compliance with halal standards after certification, including during distribution and sales. The methodology employed is normative legal analysis, utilizing legislative, conceptual, and historical approaches. Research data include key regulations, training materials, and relevant implementation reports. The findings reveal that although Indonesia's halal regulations, such as Law No. 33 of 2014, provide a robust legal foundation, postmarket supervision faces challenges, including limited resources, inter-agency coordination issues, and gaps in implementation. The training of JPH supervisors is identified as a strategic initiative with promising potential to enhance supervision effectiveness, mainly through technology-based programs like Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). However, challenges in integrating supervision into the existing regulatory framework remain unresolved. This study underscores the importance of strengthening continuous supervision mechanisms during the postmarket phase to ensure the halal status of products throughout their lifecycle. Thus, postmarket supervision is a technical issue and a moral responsibility aligned with Islamic law principles.

From Certification to Consumption: Shariah-Compliant Postmarket Halal Assurance Thalhah; Hamizar, Arizal; Hunsouw, M. Taib; Roup, Mu'min
Hikmatuna : Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Hikmatuna: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, December 2024
Publisher : UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/hikmatuna.v10i2.9042

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the regulatory framework in ensuring the halal status of products in Indonesia during the postmarket phase. The primary focus is to evaluate the role of Halal Product Assurance (Jaminan Produk Halal/JPH) supervisors in maintaining compliance with halal standards after certification, including during distribution and sales. The methodology employed is normative legal analysis, utilizing legislative, conceptual, and historical approaches. Research data include key regulations, training materials, and relevant implementation reports. The findings reveal that although Indonesia's halal regulations, such as Law No. 33 of 2014, provide a robust legal foundation, postmarket supervision faces challenges, including limited resources, inter-agency coordination issues, and gaps in implementation. The training of JPH supervisors is identified as a strategic initiative with promising potential to enhance supervision effectiveness, mainly through technology-based programs like Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). However, challenges in integrating supervision into the existing regulatory framework remain unresolved. This study underscores the importance of strengthening continuous supervision mechanisms during the postmarket phase to ensure the halal status of products throughout their lifecycle. Thus, postmarket supervision is a technical issue and a moral responsibility aligned with Islamic law principles.

Ethical Governance in Public Service: A Comparative Study of Hadaya al-‘Ummal in Islamic Law and Gratification in Indonesian Law H, Rajab; Paee, Rokiah; Thalhah; Nurdin, Rustina
International Journal of Law and Society Vol 3 No 3 (2024): International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS)
Publisher : NAJAHA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59683/ijls.v3i3.120

Corruption continues to undermine governance, economic growth, and public trust in Indonesia. This study compares the Islamic concept of Hadaya al-’Ummal which strictly prohibits public officials from accepting any gifts that might compromise their integrity with the Indonesian legal framework on gratification, which permits gift acceptance provided that such benefits are reported within a specified period. Employing a qualitative comparative analysis grounded in Principal-Agent theory, the research examines five dimensions: the definition of gift-giving, the scope of recipients, legal sanctions, reporting mechanisms, and the handling of gifts. Data were collected from classical Islamic texts, legislative documents, and recent empirical studies to offer a comprehensive perspective on how ethical principles and legal measures interact in the context of corruption control. The findings reveal that Hadaya al-’Ummal offers a clear ethical guideline rooted in Islamic teachings, yet its informal enforcement limits its practicality in modern public institutions. In contrast, while the Indonesian legal framework provides explicit sanctions and formal reporting channels, its broad definitions and cultural nuances result in ambiguities and inconsistent application. High-profile cases have highlighted these challenges and underscored the need for clearer definitions and more effective oversight. The study argues that an integrated approach that refines legal definitions improves reporting systems and promotes comprehensive bureaucratic reforms while maintaining ethical accountability is essential to reduce corruption. These insights have important implications for developing anti-corruption strategies that enhance transparency, accountability, and ultimately, public trust.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search