Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Collegium Studiosum Journal AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum
M. Hadin Muhjad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PERAN NOTARIS DALAM MEMBERIKAN PENYULUHAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENDIRIAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS Siska Andriani; M. Hadin Muhjad; Saprudin
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v6i2.1114

Abstract

Based on Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 concerning Electronically Integrated Business Licensing Services (hereinafter referred to as PP Number 24 of 2018 which states that company registration, both individual and non-individual, must be carried out through the OSS system. The development of the process of establishing a Limited Liability Company in accordance with Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 means that the notary must also be able to following changes by properly understanding the OSS system, especially in KBLI registration, this means that the role of notaries in this matter is very necessary, this is also considering the authority of notaries in providing legal counseling. The emergence of the role of Notaries in providing legal counseling regarding the establishment of Limited Liability Companies raises questions regarding the extent of counseling. the law that can be given by a notary and the legal consequences if the notary does not carry out legal counseling. Notaries are responsible and have the authority to provide legal counseling to parties establishing limited liability companies. This is in accordance with Article 15 paragraph (2) letter e of the Notary Position Law. However, this form of responsibility is not within the realm of an obligation, only in the form of authority alone, so that in this case, if the notary does not exercise his authority in providing legal counseling, it will not have any influence on the deed he makes. There are no sanctions for Notaries who do not provide legal counseling to applicants establishing Limited Liability Companies.
PERAN NOTARIS DALAM MEMBERIKAN PENYULUHAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENDIRIAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS Siska Andriani; M. Hadin Muhjad; Saprudin
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v6i2.1114

Abstract

Based on Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 concerning Electronically Integrated Business Licensing Services (hereinafter referred to as PP Number 24 of 2018 which states that company registration, both individual and non-individual, must be carried out through the OSS system. The development of the process of establishing a Limited Liability Company in accordance with Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 means that the notary must also be able to following changes by properly understanding the OSS system, especially in KBLI registration, this means that the role of notaries in this matter is very necessary, this is also considering the authority of notaries in providing legal counseling. The emergence of the role of Notaries in providing legal counseling regarding the establishment of Limited Liability Companies raises questions regarding the extent of counseling. the law that can be given by a notary and the legal consequences if the notary does not carry out legal counseling. Notaries are responsible and have the authority to provide legal counseling to parties establishing limited liability companies. This is in accordance with Article 15 paragraph (2) letter e of the Notary Position Law. However, this form of responsibility is not within the realm of an obligation, only in the form of authority alone, so that in this case, if the notary does not exercise his authority in providing legal counseling, it will not have any influence on the deed he makes. There are no sanctions for Notaries who do not provide legal counseling to applicants establishing Limited Liability Companies.
Implementasi Asas Kontradiktur Delimitasi Pada Penetapan Batas Tanah Dalam Sistem Pendaftaran Tanah Nasional Alfisyahrin Firdaus; M. Hadin Muhjad; Fauzan Ramon; Muslimah Hayati; Achmadi
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.4633

Abstract

Asas kontradiktur delimitasi merupakan asas fundamental dalam hukum pendaftaran tanah yang berperan penting dalam proses penetapan batas bidang tanah. Asas ini menekankan keterlibatan langsung para pihak yang berbatasan untuk menyaksikan dan menyetujui batas yang ditentukan, sehingga tercapai kepastian hukum hak atas tanah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi asas kontradiktur delimitasi dalam sistem pendaftaran tanah nasional, mengidentifikasi kendala dalam penerapannya, serta menawarkan solusi untuk memperkuat asas tersebut agar berfungsi optimal. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Data diperoleh dari peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, dan putusan pengadilan yang berkaitan dengan sengketa batas tanah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun asas kontradiktur delimitasi telah diakui dalam sistem pendaftaran tanah, implementasinya di lapangan masih jauh dari optimal. Kendala yang muncul antara lain minimnya pemahaman masyarakat, lemahnya administrasi, keterbatasan sumber daya manusia, serta belum adanya pedoman teknis yang baku. Kesimpulan penelitian menegaskan bahwa diperlukan penguatan regulasi, peningkatan kapasitas aparat pertanahan, serta sosialisasi kepada masyarakat agar asas ini dapat benar-benar berfungsi sebagai instrumen pencegahan sengketa dan penjamin kepastian hukum dalam pendaftaran tanah.
Kewenangan Notaris dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa atas Akta yang Dibuatnya Sa’adiyah Nur Hizrah; M. Hadin Muhjad
AHKAM Vol 5 No 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10880

Abstract

Although the role of notaries as public officials in preparing authentic deeds has been widely studied, discussions that specifically examine the authority of notaries as mediators in resolving disputes over deeds they have prepared themselves and the legal implications arising from this role remain limited. This study aims to analyze whether dispute resolution is part of a notary’s authority when acting as a mediator for deeds they have prepared, as well as to examine the legal implications arising from the exercise of this role. This study used a qualitative approach with a normative legal research design through a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were obtained through literature study and were then analyzed prescriptively through interpretation of relevant laws and regulations, doctrines, and literature. The results showed that the Notary Position Law does not explicitly grant notaries the authority to act as mediators in resolving disputes over deeds they have prepared. However, the authority of notaries to provide legal counseling, as regulated in Article 15 paragraph (2) letter e of the Notary Position Law, may serve as an argumentative basis for notarial involvement in assisting the parties in resolving disputes through non-litigation mechanisms. On the other hand, the involvement of notaries as mediators may create a conflict of interest because notaries have a direct relationship with the deed that becomes the object of the dispute, which may affect the principles of mediator independence and neutrality. This finding contributes to the development of notarial law studies, particularly regarding the limits of notarial authority in alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of clearer regulation concerning the position, authority, and mechanisms of notaries as mediators to ensure legal certainty and prevent conflicts of interest. The implications of this study include theoretical contributions to the development of notarial law and alternative dispute resolution, as well as practical implications for lawmakers and notarial professional organizations in formulating regulations that accommodate the role of notaries as mediators in a professional manner.
Co-Authors Achmadi Alfisyahrin Firdaus Fauzan Ramon Muslimah Hayati Saprudin Sa’adiyah Nur Hizrah Siska Andriani