Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Islamic Review : Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Al-Insaf - Jurnal Ahwal Al Syakhshiyyah
Adib, Ahmad Hidhir
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Kontra Narasi atas Tanggapan Ibnu Rusyd terhadap Imam Al-Ghazali Terkait Apostesi Filosof Adib, Ahmad Hidhir; Dliyauddin, Ahmad; Nisa', Luthfi Karimatun; Afida, Narse Nur
Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman Vol 13 No 1 (2024): April 2024
Publisher : Mafapress - Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) IPMAFA Pati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35878/islamicreview.v13i1.1082

Abstract

The dialogue between Imam Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd is one of the most monumental stories in the study of Islamic philosophy, in which his criticism of Al-Ghazali is refuted by Ibn Rushd with his various arguments. The purpose of this article is to strengthen Imam Al-Ghazali's criticism of the philosophical eschatological paradigm. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The results of this study indicate that (1) Imam Al-Ghazali sentenced the philosophers to be disbelievers who held this view of nature as eternality, God does not know the details, and the resurrection of the soul on the Day of Judgment. (2) However, this verdict was criticized by Ibn Rushd. That nature is eternal, because its existence coincides with the beginning of time. Then this knowledge of God has nothing to do with a detailed or global model of knowledge, because God is the substance that causes an object to exist. Then this religious text is metaphorical in nature, so it is not certain that it is the body that is resurrected. (3) It's just that, the majority of scholars' from Sunni circles support Imam Al-Ghazali's statement. They based it on religious texts QS. Al-Hadid verse 3 about the eternality of nature, QS Al-An'am verse 28 regarding the knowledge of God, and QS Al-Kahf verse 47 and Al-Anbiya '104 regarding the resurrection of the body.
Resistance of the Al-Qurṭubī to the Interpretation of Jannah in Qs. Al-Baqarah: 35 as a Place on Earth Athi'ullah, Ibnur Rijal; Nisa', Luthfi Karimatun; Adib, Ahmad Hidhir
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 10, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v10i2.6451

Abstract

The Qur'an, as the word of Allah SWT, establishes many dictions when visualizing heaven, one of which is Jannah. Jannah is also one of the dictions that Rasulullah SAW chose when explaining to his friends about heaven. However, the term jannah in the Koran does not always mean heaven, sometimes it means garden. Departing from these two meanings, the mufassir disagrees regarding the meaning of Jannah in the QS. al-Baqarah: 35. This verse tells the story of the Prophet Adam who lived in Jannah. In this case, al-Qurṭubī very harshly criticized those who said Jannah in the QS. al-Baqarah: 35 is not heaven. The argument is built on three reasons, namely that someone who enters heaven will not come out of it, Satan cannot enter heaven, and there is no taklīf in heaven. This research aims to determine al-Qurṭubī’s critical analysis of the interpretation of Jannah in the QS. al-Baqarah: 35. This type of research is qualitative with a critical discourse analysis approach which is enhanced by literature review. The result, firstly, according to al-Qurṭubī, Prophet Adam's stay in heaven was indeed temporary. His expulsion from heaven is a scenario that Allah SWT has prepared. Second, Satan's entry into heaven is not impossible. Third, the absence of taklīf applies when all the inhabitants of heaven have entered it as a reward for what they have done in the world.
Piercing Law for Muslims in The Views of Al-Ghazali and Ibn Hajar Al-Haitami Nabilah, Nafa; Thoha, Anis Malik; Fattah, Abdul; Haidar, Putri Bayu; Syari'ah, Atiris; Adib, Ahmad Hidhir
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 15, No 1 (2024): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v15i1.25210

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the views of Islamic jurists on the use of piercing in a beautification context. The piercing phenomenon is widespread among Muslims, both men and women, in various Islamic countries. This research uses a qualitative type with a library research approach. This research methodology involves a comprehensive analysis of the views of various scholars and interpretations of verses from al-Qur’an, hadith, and fiqh books related to the topic of piercing in the context of religious law. From this research, the results showed that several scholars had different perspectives regarding this problem. Imam Ibnu Hajar al-Haitami considers piercing women's ears for jewelry purposes is permissible because it is part of 'urf (habit). However, al-Ghazali emphasized that piercing or self-harm and not permitted. There are prohibitions for men regarding piercing. Imam Ghazali and Ibn Hajar al-Haitami agree that nose piercing on women and men is forbidden because of the potential to cause painful wounds. Apart from that, making decorations in places other than ears is also prohibited because it can resemble the practices of infidels, wicked or immoral people. As a devout Muslim need to be careful and aware of the beautification jurisprudence so that it is under the principles and objectives of Islamic law.
Monogamy As The Substance of Pre-Nuptial Agreement: A Cross-Mazhab Comparative Study Adib, Ahmad Hidhir; Ahmad, Moch Said
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 15, No 2 (2024): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v15i2.22270

Abstract

Polygamy is one of the factors causing divorce. To overcome this, the concept of a pre-nuptial agreement can be applied as proposed by Sayyidah Sukainah towards her husband. This study aims to answer the legality of monogamy requirements proposed by the bride. The research method used in this research is literature study with a mazhab (school of thought) comparative approach. The author will compare the views of 5 mazhab; Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hambali and Dzahiri.The results of this study indicate that if a woman who adheres to the mazhab of Syafi'i or Maliki does not want her husband to be polygamous, then make a nazar (vow) to her husband. Meanwhile, if she belongs to the Hambali, the scholars legalize this monogamy requirement, even if it has become a tradition in the woman's region, then the condition is automatically binding. Whereas in the Hanafi mazhab, these conditions are not binding, but have an impact on the type of Mahar (dower). So in case of the husband does not meet these requirements, then the wife is entitled to a mahar mitsil dowry of mahar mitsil (determined dower). Whereas in the Dzahiri mazhab, these conditions are not binding, even in case they appear in the contract, it results in the cancellation of the marriage.
Waqaf Sajadah Untuk Dijadikan Masjid (Studi Analisis Literatur Fikih Syafi’i) Adib, Ahmad Hidhir; Vina, Vina Wardatus Sakinah
Al-Inṣāf Vol 1 No 2 (2022): Al-Insaf - Jurnal Ahwal Al Syakhshiyyah
Publisher : Prodi Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah STAI Imam Syafi'i Cianjur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61610/ash.v1i2.11

Abstract

Endowing something is a noble deed, so this deed is highly recommended to be done. But keep in mind that if you have endowed something, then the ownership of the item, automatically transferred. The ownership of the goods that he endowed, then the authority of ownership passed to Allah SWT. So that the waqif can no longer monopolize the benefits of mauquf bih. This article will discuss the endowment of goods to be used as a mosque, in the sense that the goods will be a mosque. That is, if in general what is endowed to be a mosque is a piece of land, then this article will reveal the fact that it is possible to endow the pray rug. The urgency of knowing this qadiyyah is to get the reward of I’tikaf, which with us having a mosque in the form of a prayer rug, then the law of the mosque will apply to the prayer rug as if it could be made a place for I’tikaf. Of course this will make it easier for us to worship, because it can be entertained by doing other activities. But should also continue to come to the mosque, this concept is only a solution.
Co-Authors Abdul Fattah Afida, Narse Nur Ahmad, Moch Said Athi'ullah, Ibnur Rijal Dliyauddin, Ahmad Haidar, Putri Bayu Nabilah, Nafa Nisa', Luthfi Karimatun Syari'ah, Atiris Thoha, Anis Malik Vina, Vina Wardatus Sakinah