Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.177
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAHKAMAH Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan LEGAL BRIEF Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Maliyah : Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam Jurnal Hukum Legalita International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research of Higher Education (IJMURHICA) Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Law & Pass : International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies
Ramadhana, Widodo
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Legal Validity and Evidentiary Strength of Online Sales Agreements via WhatsApp Rinditamy, Olivia; Ramadhana, Widodo
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research of Higher Education Vol 9 No 2 (2026): (April) Theme Education, Religion Studies, Social Sciences, STEM and Economic Dev
Publisher : Islamic Studies and Development Center in Collaboration With Students' Research Center Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/ijmurhica.v9i2.561

Abstract

This study examines the legal validity and evidentiary strength of online sales agreements conducted through WhatsApp, within the framework of Indonesian Civil Law and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. Using a qualitative normative juridical approach, the research analyzes statutory provisions and conceptual perspectives supported by literature review. The findings indicate that sales agreements via WhatsApp are legally binding as long as they fulfill the validity requirements stipulated in Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. WhatsApp conversations may serve as admissible electronic evidence under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, provided they meet the criteria of authenticity, integrity, and accountability. Nevertheless, practical challenges arise from potential data manipulation and difficulties in verifying the parties’ identities. The implications highlight the necessity of supplementary evidence, enhanced public legal literacy, strengthened digital forensic capacity among law enforcement, and adaptive regulatory development to ensure legal certainty in electronic transactions.
Co-Authors Adawiyah, Rodiatun Arif Prasetyo, Muhammad Ashly Chendanie, Feby Ayu Sartika Telaumbanua, Yohana Celine, Celine Chew, Andrew Christofel Sinaga, Mathew Damanik, Stevi Idhel Wheis Farhansyah, Reza Fernando, Jensen Gokman Lumbantungkup, Hebri IRWANDA, IRWANDA Jennifer, Tenny Khairunnisa Nasution, Dinda Muhammad Arif Prasetyo Pangaribuan, Ariel Zefanya Romaito Lhomak Rinditamy, Olivia Rizki Rusydi Pili , Fadel Muhammad Safron, Ananda Salim, Filbert Sembiring, Josua Pramana Adika Tamba, Nico Pernando Wilfred Joshua Rohtuahdo Purba, Barryl Zai, Vingi Julisman Zebua, Berkat Firmanius