Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan (JURRIPEN) AL-BAHTS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, dan Hukum
Deriel Pratama Putra
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Strategi Penanganan Politik Uang Dalam Pemilu Legeslatif Berdasarkan Demokrasi Pancasila Menuju Pemilu Yang Berintegritas Dhamar Djati Sasongko; Ima Nur Syamsiah; Aurellia Mirabel Fredlyna; Theo Reksa Sadewa; Deriel Pratama Putra; Kuswan Hadji
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Juli : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v2i3.3179

Abstract

This article discusses strategies for handling money politics in legislative general elections using the Pancasila Democracy approach as a foundation for general elections with integrity. By referring to the principles of Pancasila which emphasize social justice, people's sovereignty,unity and balance between rights and obligations, this article identifies concrete steps that can be taken to overcome the practice of money politics which undermines democracy. Writing is carried out using normative juridical methods, namely research on secondary data or library materials. To realize elections with integrity, primary legal materials will guide the writing of strategies for handling political money in legislative elections based on Pancasila democracy. These steps include law enforcement, political education, financial transparency, independent oversight, active participation, public disclosure of the campaign, and use of technology. By implementing these strategies holistically and based on Pancasila values, it is hoped that Indonesia can overcome the challenges of money politics and strengthen integrity in the legislative election process, as well as build a stronger foundation for a healthy democracy and integrity.
Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Transaksi Syariah: Prespektif Hukum Islam Rohmatul Jannah; Keisya Oktavia Afida Denna; Theo Galih Prayudha; Deriel Pratama Putra; Riyan Destra Dwi Ardianto; Sheva Andika Ramajagandhi; Essa Hertiana; Ikhwan Nur Ramadhan; Nur Rofiq
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU PENDIDIKAN Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): April : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurripen.v4i1.4564

Abstract

The urgency of consumer protection in Sharia-compliant transactions has become increasingly prominent alongside the growth of the halal industry and rising public awareness of transactional justice based on Islamic principles. This study aims to formulate the theoretical and normative construction of consumer protection within the framework of Islamic law and to assess its compatibility with Indonesia’s positive legal system. Employing a normative juridical approach combined with a descriptive-analytical method, this research explores primary legal sources including Qur’anic verses, the hadiths of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), and scholarly opinions found in classical and contemporary fiqh al-mu‘āmalāt literature, as well as secondary legal sources such as Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, fatwas of the National Sharia Council (DSN-MUI), and relevant academic literature. The analysis is conducted through content analysis to extract the values of justice, transparency, and balance of rights and obligations within contractual mechanisms. This study finds that core principles such as truthfulness (ṣidq), disclosure (bayān), and justice (‘adālah) constitute the essential foundation of consumer protection in the Islamic legal perspective. The prohibition of gharar (uncertainty), riba (usury), and tadlīs (fraudulent misrepresentation) is not merely a moral injunction but an integral safeguard mechanism for consumer rights. Furthermore, the institutional presence of supervisory bodies such as DSN-MUI and Sharia certification mechanisms has proven to be strategic, though they continue to face challenges in implementation, socialization, and consumer literacy. The findings also indicate a substantial opportunity for harmonizing Islamic legal principles with the national legal system within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. Therefore, this study recommends strengthening sectoral regulations based on Sharia principles, integrating fatwas into positive legal norms, and enhancing educational capacity for both business actors and consumers in order to realize ethical, equitable, and sustainable transactions.
Upaya Diplomasi Persuasif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Wilayah Kashmir antara India dan Pakistan Arvi Octabiana; Aan Anisah; Muhammad Arvin Zakiy Fuadi; Syafiqa Nadhira Kusuma; Deriel Pratama Putra; Surya, Bintang Afifah Nailah
AL-BAHTS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial,Politik, dah Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2025): AL-BAHTS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, dan Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/albahts.v2i3.4286

Abstract

The Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan has been ongoing since 1947, making it one of the most complex territorial disputes in the world. The situation is exacerbated by colonial legacies, differences in national identity and religion, and the strategic interests of these two nuclear-armed nations. Various attempts at resolution, whether through diplomatic pressure, military action, or the involvement of international entities such as the United Nations (UN), have failed to produce a lasting peaceful resolution. An alternative approach known as persuasive diplomacy has emerged, with the UN playing an important role through the UNMOGIP mission responsible for monitoring ceasefire violations. However, the effectiveness of UNMOGIP has been limited by restricted access, mandate constraints, and a lack of cooperation, particularly from India following the 1972 Simla Agreement. The principle of self-determination through a referendum is often suggested as a peaceful resolution; however, its implementation is hindered by conflicting territorial claims and the domestic political landscape in both countries. The lack of mutual trust, the influence of local factions, and the continued exploitation of the Kashmir issue for domestic political gain further complicate the negotiation process. This study emphasizes that the effectiveness of persuasive diplomacy is significantly influenced by domestic political stability, willingness to compromise, and active support from the international community. Therefore, while persuasive diplomacy holds considerable promise for promoting peace, the existing structural and political obstacles mean that this strategy requires strong commitment from all parties involved, reforms within the international framework, and the adoption of a comprehensive approach that takes into account the historical context, collective identity, and aspirations of the Kashmiri people to achieve a fair resolution.
Co-Authors Aan Anisah Arvi Octabiana Aurellia Mirabel Fredlyna Dhamar Djati Sasongko Essa Hertiana Ikhwan Nur Ramadhan Ima Nur Syamsiah Keisya Oktavia Afida Denna Kuswan Hadji Muhammad Arvin Zakiy Fuadi Nur Rofiq Riyan Destra Dwi Ardianto Rohmatul Jannah Sheva Andika Ramajagandhi Surya, Bintang Afifah Nailah Syafiqa Nadhira Kusuma Theo Galih Prayudha Theo Reksa Sadewa