Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Kajian Kasus Tersangka Tom Lembong) Yuspar; Fahmiron
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 8 No 4 (2025): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Januari 2025)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/3nq2fy96

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi merupakan salah satu kejahatan tingkat tinggi (ordinary crime), karena tindak pidana korupsi bukan hanya merugikan keuangan negara, melainkan juga merugikan masyarakat luas. Tindak Pidana korupsi sendiri kebanyakan di lakukan oleh orang yang memiliki kedudukan atau jabatan, seperti ASN (Aparatur Sipil Negara), Menteri, Gubernur, Bupati, dan pejabat pemerintah lainnya. Dengan adanya kedudukan atau jabatan dan kewenangan yang dimiliki membuat para pejabat pemerintah memiliki banyak jalan dan kesempatan untuk menyalahgunakan kewenangan dalam melakukan tindak pidana korupsi. Untuk menganalisis sifat melawan hukum serta parameter untuk menentukan dan menilai suatu penyalahgunaan wewenang yang perumusannya selama ini masih lemah sehingga menimbulkan multi interprestasi dengan unsur melawan hukum sebagai tindak pidana korupsi yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Rumusan masalah yang diangkat Bagaimana perumusan delik penyalahgunaan wewenang sebagai tindak pidana korupsi dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia serta bagaimana sifat melawan hukum secara formil dan material.
The Effectiveness of Patrol Implementation by the Padang Police Traffic Unit in Combating Wild Racing Junaidi, Andes; Susi Delmiati; Fahmiron
Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): June
Publisher : Master of Law Program, Ekasakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60034/dt33aj19

Abstract

One of the efforts made to prevent Kamtibmas disturbances by the Police is to conduct patrols, which are regulated in the Regulation of the Head of the Security Maintenance Agency of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2017 concerning Patrols. This is important because it is an essential need for everyone in various aspects of life, and is free from all worries, threats, disturbances of kamtibmas. One of the triggers for kamtibmas disturbances is the wild racing action that occurred in Padang City. Research is descriptive analytical with a normative juridical approach supported by an empirical juridical approach. Based on the results of research and analysis obtained first, the effectiveness of the implementation of patrols by the Padang Police Traffic Unit in tackling wild racing has not been maximally proven until now there are still wild racing actions at several road points in Padang City. In addition, the actions of the Police only use repressive measures, namely fines based on traffic violations. Second, the obstacles encountered in the implementation of patrols by the Padang Police Traffic Unit in tackling wild racing include internal obstacles , namely the absence of a Special Unit that handles wild racing actions so that it is limited to control and disbandment, as well as the lack of personnel of the Padang Police Station considering the large number of illegal racing actors who often move around in holding wild racing actions. External constraints are the absence of integrated cameras with traffic units at road points that are used as wild racing actions so that patrols must still be carried out directly to areas prone to wild racing and betting culture among people who love speed racing and the absence of special facilities and places or racing arenas in Padang City.
Kewenangan Kejaksaan Penghentian Penuntutan dalam Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Restorative Justice Yuspar, Yuspar; Fahmiron
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1595

Abstract

Criminal cases, both large and small cases or serious and minor cases, are all resolved through a judicial mechanism which results in imprisonment, as a result of overcapacity in prison, apart from that the convict and the victim still have dissatisfaction, of course, other alternatives to consider such as the concept of restorative justice . The restorative approach is a process of solving criminal acts that aims to restore the situation to its original state. The Attorney General's Office as an institution that is given the authority in terms of prosecution in criminal cases, of course, is also given the authority to terminate criminal cases, through the Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia number 15 of 2020 concerning Cessation of Prosecution based on Restorative Justice, it can be possible for cases that comply with the criteria in the regulation.