Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.515
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wacana Hukum Arena Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Politea : Jurnal Politik Islam Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Informatio: Journal of Library and Information Science PATTIMURA Legal Journal Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science West Science Law and Human Rights Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR) Journal of Contemporary Law Studies International Journal of Law Analytic Jurnal Pusat Studi Pancasila dan Kebijakan
Maulana, Muhammad Asrul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Analisis Penentuan Dolus dan Culpa dalam Penyebaran Hoax Melalui Digital Maulana, Muhammad Asrul; Aristi, Savira
Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science Vol 3 No 10 (2024): Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jmws.v3i10.1612

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kesalahan pidana, khususnya dolus (kesengajaan) dan culpa (kelalaian), dalam penyebaran hoaks melalui media digital dengan metode normatif pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), hasil penelitian mengkaji undang-undang terkait antara dolus ditentukan ketika seseorang dengan sengaja menyebarkan informasi palsu yang diketahui dapat merugikan, sementara culpa timbul dari kelalaian memverifikasi kebenaran informasi. Analisis ini membantu membedakan antara penyebar hoaks yang disengaja dan yang lalai, serta memberikan kerangka hukum yang jelas terkait sanksi pidana yang sesuai.
UPAYA ADMINISTRASI PENGGELAPAN PAJAK PT ASIAN AGRI GROUP TERHADAP DAMPAK KERUGIAN NEGARA Maulana, Muhammad Asrul; Pora, Salsabila Sqizinova
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Repertorium
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v14i2.5116

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji upaya administrasi terkait penggelapan pajak oleh PT Asian Agri Group (AAG) yang menimbulkan kerugian negara dalam jumlah besar. Secara hukum, tindakan AAG memenuhi unsur pidana perpajakan berdasarkan UU KUP dan berpotensi terkait rezim anti-pencucian uang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian perkara dapat dilakukan melalui mekanisme administratif, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 44B UU No. 28 Tahun 2007, sepanjang wajib pajak melunasi kewajiban pajak dan sanksi. Namun, hambatan muncul karena aset AAG yang disita telah diagunkan, serta belum adanya pengaturan tegas terkait pemidanaan korporasi. Temuan ini menekankan pentingnya transparansi kepemilikan, pengawasan pajak ketat, dan kerja sama internasional.
Harmonisasi Regulasi Insentif Penanaman Modal Kabupaten Sidoarjo Pasca Berlakunya Undang-undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Cipta Kerja Pramesti, Swastika Maya; Maulana, Muhammad Asrul; Maharani, Ni Ketut Indhira
Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 9 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Jayapangus Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37329/ganaya.v9i1.5223

Abstract

The background of this research is to examine and analyze the legitimacy of the Regional Government in regulating investment incentives and facilities based on the principles of legality and hierarchy of laws and regulations, analyzing the suitability of the practice of providing investment incentives and facilities in Sidoarjo with the basic principles of investment, including the principle of non-discrimination, international obligations, and compliance with national law. The purpose of this research is to formulate more integrated policy recommendations between the central and regional governments in order to create a more inclusive fiscal policy system in terms of investment. This research method uses a normative approach with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study show that Sidoarjo Regency Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2014 and Regent Regulation Number 58 of 2015 have become the basis for providing incentives do not fully reflect the basic principles of investment stated in the latest national laws such as Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation, and have not been integrated with Indonesia's international obligations in global investment agreements. This inconsistency creates the risk of legal uncertainty and has the potential to reduce investor confidence, both domestic and foreign. The conclusion of this research is that legal protection is needed for investors related to incentives through reporting, evaluation, guidance and supervision mechanisms, as well as government incentive products that can be utilized by investors.
From Hashtag to Policy: Viral Anger and Lawmaking in Indonesia’s Digital Democracy Arintyas, Ameylia Puspita Rosa Dyah Ayu; Aristi, Savira; Maulana, Muhammad Asrul
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v5i2.1949

Abstract

This study analyzes how viral digital mobilization translated public anger into policy responses in Indonesia through the 2025 #BubarkanDPR and 17+8 Tuntutan Rakyat movements. While #BubarkanDPR (“Disband the House of Representatives”) emerged as a symbolic critique of legislative privilege and accountability deficits, the 17+8 platform converted diffuse online outrage into twenty-five structured reform demands. Using a qualitative case study integrating digital discourse analysis, media triangulation, and legal document review, the research examines the interaction between emotional mobilization, elite response, and constitutional constraints. The findings demonstrate that viral anger operated as political pressure producing three outcomes: institutional concessions, including suspension of housing allowances and transparency commitments; disciplinary sanctions against legislators after controversial remarks; and activation of oversight mechanisms such as ethics reviews and human rights investigations. However, the core demand to dissolve parliament was constitutionally barred under Article 7C of the amended 1945 Constitution, underscoring structural limits. The study argues that in Indonesia’s digital democracy, virality constitutes contingent political legitimacy, capable of triggering short-term accountability but insufficient to transform entrenched power structures.
Co-Authors Abela, Vara Yuniar Ailani, Khalisah Leticia amalina, zaskiya Ameylia Puspita Rosa Dyah Ayu Arintyas Aristi, Savira Avrillina, Java Putri Bimantara, Arya Dwi Jayanti, Cici Fanisa Yulia Fajar Muharram Fajri, Kharisma Fatmalina Isthikomah Maharani, Ni Ketut Indhira Multazam, Mochamad Tanzil Nurcahyani, Niken Pora, Salsabila Sqizinova Pramesti, Swastika Maya Putri, Mega Oktaviana Raden Mohamad Herdian Bhakti Radian Salman Risti, Savira Roby Ananta, Ahmad Rizal Santosa, Shilla Hasmara Sembiring, Rinawati Tsaqofah Islamiy, Fahmiyah