Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

The Concept of Special Courts in the Settlement of Regional Head Election Cases in Indonesia dodi jaya wardana; Sukardi .; Radian Salman
Justitia Jurnal Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Justitia Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v6i02.9718

Abstract

A special court for the settlement of regional head election cases needs to be established / held for the settlement of cases for regional head elections and this special court is established before the implementation of regional head elections simultaneously nationally. This special court for regional head elections is nothing new, but something that already exists. Moreover, this special election court has been implemented in Uruguay. The authority of the Election Court in Uruguay appears to be very broad, covering everything related to elections, from the making of the regulations, the implementation, to the settlement of the case. The form and design of the special election court institutions must be adapted to the conditions of the temporary (ad hoc) Indonesian state under the Supreme Court and has the authority to handle all cases that arise in the election process, ranging from administrative cases and election crimes to dispute over results. Regional elections. Keywords: Special Courts, the Settlement, Regional Head.
PENGUATAN MODEL REGULASI DI BIDANG PEMBIAYAAN PENYEDIAAN INFRASTRUKTUR DI INDONESIA Faizal Kurniawan; Radian Salman; Erni Agustin; Ilhami Ginang Pratidina
Simposium II UNIID 2017 Vol 2 (2017)
Publisher : Simposium II UNIID 2017

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (339.09 KB)

Abstract

Pembiayaan merupakan aspek terpenting yang mempengaruhi intensitas keterlibatan sektor swasta dalam proyek infrastruktur. Minimnya pembiayaan swasta dalam pembangunan infrastruktur, utamanya didasari faktor hukum, diantaranya perubahan kebijakan dan regulasi selama masa investasi yang diperparah dengan disharmonisasi regulasi terkait dengan prinsipprinsip hukum bisnis yang memberi kepastian berinvestasi, misalnya pemberian jaminan perbankan. Di sisi lain, jaminan pemerintah tidak dapat diberikan terhadap seluruh proyek infrastruktur, dan apabila terjadi dispute, tidak mudah dicairkan karena harus memperhatikan prinsip pengelolaan dan pengendalian risiko keuangan APBN. Sehingga konsep risk sharing sulit untuk terlaksana dan jelas menghalangi tujuan percepatan pembangunan infrastruktur. Tulisan ini mengelaborasi hambatan-hambatan hukum dalam proses penyediaan infrastruktur, termasuk mengevaluasi peraturan perundang-undangan terkait dan kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip hukum bisnis, khususnya hukum kontrak yang menjadi syarat utama hubungan hukum para pihak. Penulisan menerapkan metode penelitian hukum melalui pendekatan perundangundangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan risiko hukum dalam proyek infrastruktur berupa risiko lokasi, risiko desain, konstruksi, dan uji operasi, risiko finansial dan risiko operasional, sedangkan regulasi terkait belum menyediakan sistem pengawasan yang baik sehingga belum menjamin keberlanjutan skema kerjasama pemerintah dan swasta serta belum menjamin alokasi risiko yang tidak menyimpang dari prinsip pengelolaan dan pengendalian risiko keuangan APBN. Sehingga diperlukan payung hukum yang koheren antar sektor terkait pembangunan infrastruktur
Pembatasan Kebebasan Beragama dalam Darurat Kesehatan Virus Korona di Indonesia: Perspektif HAM dan Islam Adam Muhshi; Radian Salman
Media Iuris Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v4i3.30385

Abstract

AbstractThis paper will examine the restrictions imposed by the Indonesian government on religious activities carried out together in places of worship during the covid-19 pandemic. These restrictions in recent times have even reached the level of closing places of worship. This restriction was carried out by the government with the aim of preventing the spread of the corona virus. However, in practice, the level of citizen compliance with these restrictions is still relatively low. The question that then arises is whether restrictions on religious activities carried out together in places of worship during a pandemic (health emergency) can be justified juridically. Departing from this problem, this article will try to analyze whether or not restrictions on religious activities are correct from the point of view of human rights and Islam. The answer to this question shows that the limitation of religious activities carried out jointly in places of worship in a health emergency finds its justification both in the perspective of human rights and in the perspective of Islamic law.Keywords: Restrictions on Religious Freedom; Corona Virus; health emergency; Human rights; Islam.AbstrakPaper ini akan mengkaji pembatasan yang dilakukan pemerintah Indonesia terhadap kegiatan keagamaan yang dilaksanakan secara bersama-sama di tempat ibadah pada masa pandemi covid-19. Pembatasan tersebut dalam beberapa waktu terakhir bahkan sampai pada level penutupan tempat ibadah. Pembatasan tersebut dilakukan oleh Pemerintah dengan tujuan untuk mencegah semakin meluasnya penularan virus korona. Namun dalam prakteknya, tingkat kepatuhan warga terhadap pembatasan tersebut masih relatif rendah. Pertanyaan yang kemudian muncul adalah apakah pembatasan terhadap kegiatan kegamaan yang dilakukan secara bersama-sama di tempat ibadah pada masa pandemi (darurat kesehatan) dapat dibenarkan secara yuridis. Berangkat dari persoalan tersebut, artikel ini akan mencoba untuk menganalisis tentang benar tidaknya pembatasan terhadap kegiatan keagamaan dalam sudut pandang HAM dan Islam. Jawaban terhadap persoalan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa pembatasan kegiatan kegamaan yang dilakukan secara bersama-sama di tempat ibadah dalam kondisi darurat kesehatan menemukan justifikasinya baik dalam perspektif HAM maupun dalam perspektif hukum Islam.Kata Kunci: Pembatasan Kebebasan Beragama; Virus Korona; Darurat Kesehatan; HAM; Islam.
Administrative Law Enforcement through Supervision Instruments on Brantas River Pollution Eduardo Saratoga Wrahatnala; Suparto Wijoyo; Radian Salman; Rosa Ristawati
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 4, No 4 (2021): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute November
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v4i4.3158

Abstract

The Brantas River, which is a national strategic area, is currently experiencing pollution. The massive pollution of the Brantas River and causing its water quality to decline is a problem that must be taken seriously. The worrying quality of the Brantas River shows the performance of the Indonesian government at the central, provincial, and district/city levels in managing river quality. Although there has been a Supreme Court decision regarding the pollution of the Brantas River, the government does not yet have a comprehensive plan and serious political will to restore the polluted Brantas River. This paper aims to analyze the enforcement of environmental administrative law through monitoring instruments as the implications of a lawsuit for pollution of the Brantas River based on the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Decision No. 08/Pdt.G/2019/PNSb. Based on the results of the analysis, it is necessary to take concrete actions from executive institutions and the community so that the pollution of the Brantas River is immediately resolved and does not recur in the future and so that the water quality can improve better.
Legal Status of Village Regulations in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia Dodi Jaya Wardana; Sukardi Sukardi; Radian Salman
INNOVATION RESEARCH JOURNAL Vol 2 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30587/innovation.v2i2.3039

Abstract

Village regulations are shown as a basic device for the legitimacy of village government administrators in running the village government, in other words, village regulations are prepared as a reference in implementing government and development in the village. The purpose of this studywas to determine the legal status of village regulations in Indonesian legislation. In addition to knowing democratization in running village government. The research method used is a normative legal research method that examines laws and related literature. The results of the study indicate that that the legal status of village regulations in the statutory system is still recognized and the position of Village Regulations as a village legal product has a very strong juridical footing with the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages. Although Village Regulations no longer appear in the hierarchy of laws and regulations after the birth or enactment of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislations, their existence is strictly regulated and the position of Village Regulations is getting stronger because they have been used as a juridical basis for village regulations. With the issuance of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages.
Judicial Independence vis-à-vis Judicial Populism: the Case of Ulayat Rights and Educational Rights Rosa Ristawati; Radian Salman
Constitutional Review Vol 6, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (287.297 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/consrev614

Abstract

Judicial populism may occur when judicial branches are much more influenced by the interest of people majority. In this context, it is when justices deliver decisions according to what the people wanted and not what it has to be decided by laws. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MKRI) has the pivotal role to protect the Constitution, democracy, and the rule of law principles by adhering judicial independence in the decision making process. This paper aims to briefly find out whether the MKRI decisions on the particular issue of economic and social rights show the tendency of judicial populism and defending judicial independence. A brief conclusion would be drawn from the analysis of the two MKRI’s landmark decisions on the relevant issues of economic and social rights, in particular issues of Ulayat rights and educational rights (Case Number 35/PUU-X/2012 on the judicial review of Law No. 41 of 1999 on the Forest and Case Number No. 13/PUU-VII/2008 on the judicial review of Law No. 16 of 2008 on the Amendment of the Law No. 45/2007 on the State Budget). In a short analysis of both landmark decisions, the MKRI tends to defend its independence in delivering its decision. The Court also shows its consistency in protecting the Constitution by strictly upholding the constitutional values laid down in the Constitution and against the judicial populism. The Court in both decisions shows its constitutional commitment to preserving democratic values of minority-marginalized protection against the dominant-majoritarian interest. In the particular issue of education rights, the Court hinders the fulfilment of educational rights from the elite interest by preserving the constitutional purpose of making priority 20% for the education budget. In general, the MKRI has to guard preventing the Constitution and the rule of law principles, specifically on the issue of the protection of economic-social rights. It upholds judicial independence and put asides judicial populism.
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR SELF-RESTRAINT : SOME INSIGHT INTO THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Radian Salman; Sukardi Sukardi; Mohammad Syaiful Aris
Yuridika Vol. 33 No. 1 (2018): Volume 33 No 1 January 2018
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (318.101 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7279

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Republic of Indonesia is centralized judicial review institution which implements a posteriori and abstract control. Constitutional court decision often politically sensitive and involve important issues. On the one hand handing down strong decisions that uphold important constitutional principles can bring great benefits to citizens and can strengthen support for democracy but on the other hand, strong role of the court in judicial review tends to encroach increasingly on the territory of the law making institution. This article examines the decision of constitutional court in the framework of a tension between constitutionalism and democracy, especially from theoretical or conceptual approach. As result of examining its decisions, Indonesian Constitutional Court may reflect two characters; judicial activism as characterized by acting as law-maker and using policy in judicial decisions and/ or judicial self-restraint.  Recent  Indonesian experience shows that judicial review of legislation is not a simply of judicial control over law-making institution, as it brings  tension in the context of power relations in the scheme of separation of power. Relationship between the court and legislature, in respective of judicial review, will culminate in the philosophy of the judiciary. However, as constitutionalism and democracy are virtue, decisions of the Constitutional Court in judicial review should create mode of self-limitation within the framework of the principle of separation of powers.
Pengembangan Potensi Desa Wisata Di Masa Pandemi (Studi Di Desa Sukobendu, Lamongan) Rosa Ristawati Rosa; Radian Salman; Sri Winarsi; Wilda Prihatiningtyas; Giza'a Jati Pamoro
Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): Desember 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (358.551 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/jdh.v1i3.18408

Abstract

Dampak Covid-19 yang signifikan tidak hanya pada level nasional, tetapi juga signifikan untuk bagi masyarakat di pedesaan, salah satunya adalah Desa Sukobendu, Kecamatan Mantup, Kabupaten Lamongan, Jawa Timur. Desa Sukobendu tidak memiliki potensi alam dan cagar budaya yang dapat dikembangkan sebagai obyek wisata, Namun Desa Sukobendu mempunyai potensi letak geografis yang strategis karena berada di Perbatasan antara tiga kecamatan. Potensi wisata yang mungkin dikembangkan adalah Wisata Budaya dan Wisata Edukasi. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, maka dirasa perlu adanya pendampingan pengembangan Desa wisata dalam rangka meningkatkan perekonomian masyarakat Desa di Desa Sukobendu, Lamongan.Adapun permasalahan dan hambatan yang telah diinventarisasi di Desa Sukobendu diantaranya yaitu: belum adanya program Desa wisata, kondisi dan kualitas lingkungan yang kurang bersih, tata ruang untuk Desa wisata yang belum baik, kurangnya penyuluhan dan pelatihan pariwisata khususnya tentang Desa wisata, kurangnya fasilitas dan infrastruktur kepariwisataan, rendahnya kemampuan sumber daya manusia. Berdasarkan permasalahan tersebut selanjutnya telah dirumuskan beberapa solusi, yaitu: membuat masterplan pembangunan Desa berdasarkan potensi dan kebutuhan Desa, menjaga dan memelihara kualitas lingkungan, menetapkan tata ruang Desa wisata, mengadakan sosialisasi dan penyuluhan kepariwisataan, membangun fasilitas dan infrastruktur kepariwisataan, meningkatkan kemampuan sumber daya manusia dalam pengelolaan potensi Desa, khususnya yang terkait dengan hasil pertanian unggulan Desa, melalui pelatihan. Pengabdian masyarakat ini telah dilakukan dalam beberapa tahapan. Tahap I yakni persiapan, Tahap II yakni pelaksanaan pengabdian kepada masyarakat berupa penyuluhan, Tahap III adalah pendampingan dan pelatihan terhadap masyarakat Desa sesuai kebutuhan yang telah dirumuskan pada tahap sebelumnya, dan Tahap IV yaitu tahap evaluasi.   Development of Tourism Village Potential in the Pandemic (Study in Sukobendu Village, Lamongan) The impact of Covid-19 on humanity is extraordinary, especially for the people of Sukobendu Village, Mantup District, Lamongan Regency, East Java. Sukobendu Village does not have the potential for natural and cultural heritage that can be developed as a tourist attraction, however, Sukobendu Village has the potential for a strategic geographical location because it is located on the border between three sub-districts. The tourism potential that might be developed is Cultural Tourism and Educational Tourism. Based on this, it is felt that there is a need for assistance in the development of tourist villages in order to improve the economy of rural communities in Sukobendu village, Lamongan.The problems and obstacles that have been inventoried in Sukobendu Village include: the absence of a tourist village program, unsanitary environmental conditions and quality, poor spatial planning for tourist villages, lack of tourism counseling and training, especially regarding tourist villages, lack of facilities and infrastructure. tourism, low capacity of human resources. Based on these problems, several solutions have been formulated, namely: making a village development master plan based on the potential and needs of the village, maintaining and maintaining environmental quality, determining the spatial planning of tourist villages, conducting tourism socialization and counseling, building tourism facilities and infrastructure, increasing human resource capabilities. in managing village potential, especially those related to superior village agricultural products, through training. This community service has been carried out in several stages. Phase I is preparation, Phase II is the implementation of community service in the form of counseling, Phase III is mentoring and training for village communities according to the needs that have been formulated in the previous phase, and Phase IV is the evaluation phase.    
DERIVASI KONSEP NEGARA KEPULAUAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 Tahegga Primananda Alfath; Radian Salman; Sukardi Sukardi
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol 4, No 2 (2020): Bina Hukum Lingkungan
Publisher : Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (235.511 KB) | DOI: 10.24970/bhl.v4i2.101

Abstract

ABSTRAKPasal 25A Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 pada penambahan afiks “yang berciri nusantara” memberikan derivasi terhadap konsep negara kepulauan sebagaimana diatur dalam United Nations Conventions on The Law of The Sea Tahun 1982, bahwa ada ciri khusus bagi Indonesia dalam memaknai konsep negara kepulauan.  Untuk membahas hal tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep, dan pendekatan sejarah. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ratio legis derivasi konsep negara kepulauan dalam konstitusi Indonesia pada amandemen kedua sebagai penguatan kedaulatan negara dalam pembangunan wilayahnya harus berciri nusantara. Founding constitution sejak awal perumusan, menyatakan bahwa wilayah Indonesia memiliki ciri khusus, hal tersebut juga menjadi dasar logis deklarasi Juanda bahwa Indonesia adalah negara kepulauan. Maka, akibat hukum pembangunan wilayah yang tidak didasarkan atas ketentuan konstitusi, khususnya politik hukum negara kepulauan yang berciri nusantara, memiliki potensi inkonstitusional. Kerangka hukum Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia adalah negara kepulauan yang berciri nusantara.  Kata kunci: delegasi peraturan; konstitusi; negara kepulauan. ABSTRACTArticle 25A -The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945. The addition of affixes "which was characterized by nusantara" certainly provided a derivation of the concept of an archipelagic state as stipulated in the United Nations Convention on the Sea 1982, that there were special characteristics for Indonesia in interpreting the concept of an archipelagic state. To discussed this, this research used a legal research method with statute approach, conseptual approach, and historical approach. The result of this research indicated that the ratio legis of derivation the consept of an archipelagic state in Indonesian constitution in the second amandement as strengthening the souverignty of country in development of its territory must be characterized by Nusantara. Founding constitution since the beginning of formulation, stated that the territory of Indonesia had special characteristics, it also became logical basic for the Juanda Declaration that Indonesia was archipelagic state. Thus, the legal consequences of regional development that were not based on constitutional provisions, especially the legal politics of archipelagic state that characterized by nusantara, had unconstitutional potensial. The legal framework of the unitary state of the Republic Indonesia was an archipelagic state that characterized by Nusantara.   Keywords: archipelagic state; constitution; regulatory delegation.  
Pendampingan Hukum dalam Optimalisasi Fungsi BUMDES Pasca Berlakunya PP No. 11/2021 Tentang BUMDES di Desa Sumberbendo, Lamongan Radian Salman; Wilda Prihatiningtyas; Sri Winarsi; Giza’a Jati Pamoro
Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/jdh.v2i3.20571

Abstract

Indonesia sedang berduka karena bencana pandemi covid 19 yang membuat segala aktivitas menjadi sangat terbatas secara drastis bahkan ada yang hingga terhenti. Begitu luar biasa dampak yang umat manusia khususnya bagi masyarakat Desa Sumberbendo Kecamatan Mantup Kabupaten Lamongan, Jawa Timur. Badan Usaha Milik Desa yang selanjutnya disebut BUMDes adalah suatu lembaga/badan perekonomian desa yang berbadan hukum dibentuk dan dimiliki oleh Pemerintah Desa, dikelola secara ekonomis mandiri dan profesional dengan modal seluruhnya atau sebagian besar merupakan kekayaan desa yang dipisahkan. Pada akhirnya BUMDes dibentuk dengan tujuan memperoleh keuntungan untuk memperkuat Pendapatan Asli Desa (PADes), memajukan perekonomian desa, serta meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat desa. Selanjutnya dengan berlakunya UU Cipta Kerja dan PP No. 11 Tahun 2021 tentang BUMDes, maka BUMDes merupakan entitas berbadan hukum. Dalam konteks BUMDes, kelompok sasaran dalam pengmas ini adalah Desa Sumberbendo, Kecamatan Mantup, Kabupaten Lamongan, Jawa Timur. Salah satu desa kecil yang ada kecamatan Mantup serta dikelingi oleh hutan jati dan area persawahan. Desa ini mempunyai BUMDes yang bergerak dalam simpan pinjam dan penyedia pengadaan saprodi yakni BUMDES Sumber Jaya Abadi. Desa ini adalah desa sekitar kawasan hutan yang berpotensi mengembangkan BUMDes untuk destinasi wisata yakni perkemahan berbasis hutan dan event  offroad. Dalam rangka pengembangan desa dan BUMDes ini, maka perlu dilakukan pendampingan dalam aspek mengembangkan BUMDes melalui kerjasama dengan pihak lain, Penyuluhan dan asistensi diberikan dalam aspek pemberdayaan kerjasama yang berkepastian hukum. Tujuan akhir dari Pengmas ini desa mempunyai kemampuan mengembangkan kerjasama dan makin popular sebagai destinasi yang dikembangkan oleh BUMDes. Keluaran dari Pengmas ini adalah konten berupa model kerjasama sederhana menurut hukum (kerangka template), artikel jurnal, video dan publikasi media digital.   Legal Assistance in Optimizing BUMDES Functions After PP No. 11/2021 Concerning BUMDES in Sumberbendo Village, Lamongan. Indonesia is grieving because of the covid 19 pandemic, which has made all activities drastically limited and some have even stopped. The impact on humanity is so extraordinary, especially for the people of Sumberbendo Village, Mantup District, Lamongan Regency, East Java. Village-Owned Enterprises hereinafter referred to as BUMDes, are village economic institutions/agencies that are legal entities formed and owned by the Village Government, managed economically independently and professionally with all or most of the capital being separated village assets. In the end, BUMDes was formed with the aim of gaining profits to strengthen Village Original Income (PADes), promote the village economy, and improve the welfare of rural communities. Furthermore, with the enactment of the Omnibus Law and PP no. 11 of 2021 concerning BUMDes, BUMDes is a legal entity. In the context of BUMDes, the target group in this community service is Sumberbendo Village, Mantup District, Lamongan Regency, East Java. One of the small villages in the Mantup sub-district is surrounded by teak forests and rice fields. This village has a BUMDes which is engaged in savings and loans and a provider of procurement of inputs, namely BUMDES Sumber Jaya Abadi. This village is a village around a forest area that has the potential to develop BUMDes for tourist destinations, namely forest-based camps and off-road events. In the context of developing this village and BUMDes, it is necessary to provide assistance in the aspect of developing BUMDes through collaboration with other parties. Counseling and assistance are provided in the aspect of empowering cooperation with legal certainty. The ultimate goal of this Community Service is for the village to have the ability to develop cooperation and is increasingly popular as a destination developed by BUMDes. The output of this Community Service is content in the form of a simple cooperation model according to the law (template framework), journal articles, videos, and digital media publications.