Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

LEGAL RESPONSE AGAINST FORGERY OF AUTHENTIC DEEDS USED AS THE BASIS FOR LAND REGISTRATION Indah Permata Sari Br Sembiring; Rahmat Ramadhani
Inspiring Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2025): Juli-Desember
Publisher : Inspiring Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Land holds a crucial position in the lives of Indonesians due to its high economic, social, and cultural value. To ensure legal certainty and protection of land ownership, the state implements a land registration system as stipulated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles. In practice, the transfer of land rights, particularly through sale and purchase, must be evidenced by an authentic deed drawn up by a Land Deed Official (PPAT) and used as the basis for issuing a land title certificate. However, legal issues often arise in the form of forgery of authentic deeds used as the basis for land registration, resulting in the issuance of legally flawed land title certificates and causing harm to other parties. This study aims to analyze the legal standing of authentic deeds in the Indonesian land registration system, examine the evidentiary strength and forms of legal protection for parties harmed by the issuance of land title certificates based on forged sale and purchase deeds, and outline the legal remedies available to the aggrieved parties. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach, supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that authentic deeds have perfect evidentiary force as long as they are made in accordance with applicable legal provisions. However, if the deed is proven to be forged, it loses its evidentiary force and the land title certificate issued based on it can be revoked. Aggrieved parties can pursue legal remedies through civil, criminal, and land administration channels as a form of legal protection. Therefore, strengthening the principle of prudence and supervision of authorized officials is necessary to prevent deed forgery and ensure legal certainty in land registration.
Occupation legal efforts by the community over land rights dispute of PT. Nusantara Plantation IV Regional II North Sumatra Najwa Aisyah Fitri; Rahmat Ramadhani
Inspiring Law Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2026): Juli-Desember
Publisher : Inspiring Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Right to Use Business (HGU) is a land right granted by the state to a legal entity to cultivate state land within a certain period of time. In practice, the physical control of plantation land by the community (occupation) often causes legal conflicts, especially over land that is still burdened by HGU, as happened to PT. Nusantara Plantation IV Region II North Sumatra. This study aims to analyze the legal position of HGU holders, examine legal arrangements regarding plantation land occupation by the community, and identify legal remedies that can be taken in resolving these conflicts. This study uses an empirical legal method with a sociological juridical approach and is descriptive analytical. Data was obtained through literature studies and field research, including interviews with related parties, then analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study show that PT. The Nusantara IV Regional II North Sumatra Plantation has a legal status as an HGU holder as long as the right is still valid and used according to its designation. Occupation of plantation land without a valid basis of rights is an unlawful act that is contrary to agrarian laws and regulations. Legal remedies that can be carried out include non-litigation settlements through mediation and coordination with the government and the National Land Agency, as well as litigation settlement through the courts to obtain certainty and legal protection.
Eksistensi Hak Komunal Masyarakat Hukum Adat dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Rahmat Ramadhani
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 19 No 1 (2019): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.97-108

Abstract

Hal penting yang perlu diperhatikan dalam pengadaan tanah bagi kepentingan umum adalah peralihan status hak atas tanah dari pihak pemilik tanah kepada pihak instansi yang membutuhkan tanah dengan mekanisme ganti rugi. Eksistensi hak komunal masyarakat hukum adat (MHA) atas tanah penting untuk dipertanyakan dalam kaitan pengadaan tanah. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif (normatif research) dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analistisyang memggunakan data skunder. Prosedur pengumpulan datanya adalah berupa dokumentasi catatan atau kutipan, penelusuran literatur hukum, buku-buku dan lainnya yang bertalian dengan identifikasi masalah baik secara cara offline maupun onlineyang kemudian dianalisa melalui metode analisa konten (centent analysis method) dengan fokus padapermasalahan tentang bagaimana eksistensi hak komunal MHA dalam undang-undang pengadaan tanah? dan bagaimana pengadaan tanah yang objeknya hak komunal?.  Dari hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa UU No.2/2012  tidak mengatur secara khusus tentang objek pengadaan tanah yang berasal dari hak ulayat atau menurut Permen ATR /Ka. BPN No.10/2016 disebut hak komunal, eksistensi hak komunal terlihat dalam UU Pengadaan tanah  dalam penjelasan Pasal 40 UU No.2/2012 yang menegaskan bahwa yang berhak menerima ganti rugi antara lain MHA. Sedangkan untuk pegadaan tanah yang objeknya hak komunal (hak ulayat) dilaukan melalui mekanisme ganti kerugian yang "˜layak dan adil" dengan cara; pemberian tanah pengganti, permukiman kembali, atau bentuk lain yang disepakati oleh masyarakat hukum adat yang bersangkutan.
Presidential Decree Number 62 of 2023: Distortion Regulation or Acceleration Solution for Agrarian Reform? Rahmat Ramadhani; Ida Hanifah; Farid Wajdi
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 24 No 1 (2024): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2024.V24.031-042

Abstract

The implementation of Presidential Decree No. 62 of 2023 has substantively attempted to integrate several regulations at technically applicable level; however, on the other hand, it still raises several problems, particularly in relation to the provision of land for agrarian reform objects, land originating from forest areas. This study aimed to analyze the implementation of Presidentialial Decree No.   62 of 2023 as the latest regulation regarding the acceleration of agrarian reform activities in Indonesia as an effort to recognize that land is the greatest source of wealth for people as ordered by the constitution. To analyze the problem, the method used is type study law normative. One of the factors inhibiting agrarian reform from seeming slow in creating just and prosperous land is the dis-harmonization of regulations, that cause legal gaps. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory regulation approach. The sectoral egos and legal gaps can be put aside and released to joint policies between related institutions, and agrarian reform can achieve its main essence; namely making land a source of the greatest prosperity for people. The results show that regulatory disharmony has narrowed the space for implementing agrarian reform. The advice given in this paper is to create an acceleration of agrarian reform that is right on target in accordance with the targets set, all implementing stakeholders must comply with the norms set out in the Presidential Decree in question. Thus, it is feared that Presidential Decree No. 62 of 2023 will become a regulatory distortion, even though its implementation aimed to provide a regulatory solution in the context of accelerating agrarian reform in Indonesia.