Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum PATTIMURA Legal Journal Bacarita Law Journal PATTIMURA Law Study Review CAPITAN: Constitutional Law & Administrative Law Review Jurnal Saniri
Nendissa, Renny Heronia
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Kewenangan Penjabat Negeri Dalam Pengangkatan Dan Pemberhentian Saniri Negeri Laha Kaba Kecamatan Telutih Kabupaten Maluku Tengah Koranelao, Abdul Latif; Nendissa, Renny Heronia; Soplanit, Miracle
PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 1 No 2 (2023): Desember 2023 PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/palasrev.v1i2.12183

Abstract

State officials took arbitrary actions in appointing and dismissing Saniri without any deliberation from each clan or soa which had the right and authority to appoint and dismiss State Saniri Central Maluku Regency Regional Regulation No. 04 of 2006 concerning Guidelines for Structuring State Saniri/Village Consultative Bodies explains in Article 19 Point 1 "State Saniri are selected based on representation in accordance with local customs, customary law and culture." This writing discusses two issues, namely: 1) Do State Officials have the authority to appoint and dismiss State Saniri in accordance with statutory regulations. 2) What are the legal consequences of Saniri's appointment by a State Official? The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze the authority of State Officials in appointing and dismissing State Saniri and the Legal Consequences of Appointing Saniri by State Officials. The method used in this research is a normative legal research method. The results of this research indicate that the delivery and dismissal of State Saniri by State Officials is not in accordance with local state customs or is contrary to statutory regulations. The Decree of the Regent of Central Maluku regarding the Appointment of State Saniri is invalid or legally flawed.
Penegakan Hukum Administrasi Dalam Sengketa Kepemilikan Rumah Toko Matuankotta, Jacky Alko Lazarus; Nendissa, Renny Heronia; Holle, Erick Stenly
Jurnal Saniri Vol 6, No 1 (2025): Volume 6 Nomor 1, November 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/saniri.v6i1.3519

Abstract

Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Republic of Indonesia Constitution states that: "Everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees, protection and certainty of fair law and equal treatment before the law." However, the reality in the field often does not match the ideality of the law. The decision of the Ambon City Government not to extend building rights  the shophouse in Ambon Plaza was made without a clear reason, thus creating legal uncertainty. The problem to be discussed by the author is to analyze the forms of administrative law enforcement and the legal consequences of the government not enforcing administrative law in shophouse ownership disputes. This study uses the Normative Juridical method, with an approach to statutory regulations, and a conceptual approach.. The results of the study indicate that the forms of administrative law enforcement that can be applied in shophouse ownership disputes consist of two main categories, namely through administrative instruments and administrative sanctions
Pengawasan Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Terhadap Kapal Ikan Dan Nelayan Tradisional Di Kabupaten Kepulauan Aru Rumra, Salahudin Alfa Rizky; Nendissa, Renny Heronia; Baranyanan, Soeleman Djaiz
CAPITAN: Constitutional Law & Administrative Law Review Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Desember 2025 CAPITAN: Constitutional Law & Administrative Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Studi Hukum dan Pemerintahan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/capitan.v3i2.23024

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the form, legal basis, and effectiveness of the supervision conducted by the Regional Government of the Aru Islands Regency over the management of traditional fisheries in coastal and local marine areas. The focus of the study is directed toward the scope of regional authority within the context of decentralization as regulated under Law Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Government and Law Number 31 of 2004 on Fisheries, as amended by Law Number 45 of 2009. The research employs a normative-juridical method, complemented by statutory, conceptual, and empirical approaches, through interviews with officials of the Department of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, field supervision officers, and traditional fishermen. The findings indicate that the authority of the Aru Islands Regency Government in supervising traditional fisheries encompasses functions of guidance, supervision, and community empowerment, as stipulated in Articles 65 and 66 of the Fisheries Law, Articles 39 to 40 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 2021, and Regulation of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Number 48 of 2014. However, implementation remains constrained by several challenges, including limited human resources, weak inter-agency coordination, and the suboptimal role of community-based monitoring groups (Pokmaswas). This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening local supervisory institutions and integrating customary values into the governance of traditional fisheries to realize sustainable and equitable management of marine resources.
Transparansi Pemerintah Dalam Realisasi Anggran Belanja Barang dan Jasa Suwakul, Rian; Nendissa, Renny Heronia; Pattinasarany, Yohanes
PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Agustus 2025 PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/palasrev.v3i2.23737

Abstract

Transparency in governance is one of the main principles in realizing good governance. Through transparency, the public is able to understand and monitor the budget management process so that it is carried out openly, efficiently, and accountably. In this regard, the Ambon City Government bears a significant responsibility to implement this principle, particularly in the realization of the goods and services expenditure budget. This study aims to examine the forms of transparency implemented by the Ambon City Government in carrying out the goods and services budget, as well as the legal consequences that may arise when the principle of transparency is not upheld. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were obtained from laws and regulations, legal literature, and other supporting documents. The results of the study indicate that transparency within the Ambon City Government is manifested through the implementation of electronic systems such as SIRUP (General Procurement Planning Information System), LPSE (Electronic Procurement Service), and the E-Catalogue, which serve as forms of public information disclosure in accordance with Law Number 14 of 2008 on Public Information Disclosure. Through these systems, the public can access information related to the planning, implementation, and reporting of goods and services procurement in an open manner. However, in practice, several obstacles remain, including low accountability and indications of budget misuse as found by the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK) for the years 2021–2023. A lack of transparency may result in administrative, civil, and criminal legal consequences, such as contract cancellation, sanctions against authorized officials, and liability for state financial losses. Therefore, the implementation of transparency principles is a crucial factor in realizing a clean, accountable, and publicly trusted government.
Maladministrasi Dalam Bidang Pendidikan di Indonesia Ohorella, Muhammad Fawwaz; Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen; Nendissa, Renny Heronia
PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Agustus 2025 PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/palasrev.v3i2.24349

Abstract

The legal issue in this study is the finding of intolerance against students in the school environment, namely the polemic of non-Muslim students at SMK Negeri 2 Padang, West Sumatra who are required to wear hijab. Therefore, it is interesting to examine whether intolerance can be categorized as a form of maladministration so that administrative sanctions can be applied to the action itself. The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze acts of intolerance against female students that can be categorized as maladministration and administrative sanctions that can be applied to acts of intolerance for female students in the school environment. The research method used in this writing is a normative juridical research method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study can be concluded that Intolerance Actions for female students in the school environment can be categorized as a form of maladministration in the education sector. This is based on Article 1 point 3 of Law Number 37/2008 and Article 11 of Ombudsman Regulation Number 26/2017 which defines maladministration as a form of behavior or unlawful act, one of which is discrimination, on the grounds that it does not provide freedom for students to behave and express their opinions through the way of wearing a uniform in accordance with the religion adhered to and this action is a violation of government administration and public services. Administrative sanctions that can be applied to acts of intolerance for students in the school environment are that they can be subject to disciplinary sanctions based on the rule of law.
Co-Authors Baranyanan, Soeleman Djaiz Betekeneng, Anshari deLima, Eliza Abraham Dyah Ridhul Airin Daties Galeb, Yunasril La Garciano Nirahua Halirat, Novanda Himawan, Mohammad Hilmi Holle, Eric Stenly Holle, Erick Stenly Iftitah, Wulan Ramadhani Jantje Tjiptabudy Koranelao, Abdul Latif Laim, Aderisal Lain, Haryani Lainsamputty, Natanel Larubun, Faliuw Samuel Leleury, Glenn Michael Pedro Lumintang, Junior Alvaro Nazario Matitaputty, Merlien Irene Matuankotta, Jacky Alko Lazarus Muhammad Irham Nahumury, Ryan Kevin Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen Ohorella, Muhammad Fawwaz Oszaer, Rex Joshua Pattinasarany, Yohanes Picauly, Benjamin Carel Pietersz, Jemmy Jefry Piris, Hendry John Rumra, Salahudin Alfa Rizky Saartje Sarah Alfons Sihite, Marni G Soplanit, Miracle Soselisa, Dodi L K Suwakul, Rian Tita, Heillen Martha Yosephine Tomalima, Ilham Agus Tomia, Niati Uktolseja, Novyta Van Harling, Bryan Cristanto Vica Jillyan Edsti Saija Wael, Yanti Wattimena, Jose Christy