Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Evaluasi Model Discrepancy Pelaksanaan Layanan Konseling Individu di Madrasah Tsanawiya Diniyah, Usrotun; Hidayah, Nur; Hotifah, Yuliati
TERAPUTIK: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Vol 8, No 2 (2024): TERAPUTIK: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling FIPPS Unindra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26539/teraputik.822884

Abstract

Evaluasi adalah komponen penting dalam pengendalian mutu pendidikan nasional, dengan tanggung jawab yang jelas kepada pihak terkait. Evaluasi harus dilakukan secara berkala, menyeluruh, transparan, dan sistematis oleh lembaga independen untuk menilai pelaksanaan standar nasional pendidikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui gap antara kriteria yang ditetapkan dengan keterlaksanaan layanan di lapangan gterkait pelaksanaan konseling individu di Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Model evaluasi yang digunakan adalah kesenjangan (discrepancy evaluation model). Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah guru bimbingan dan konseling yang melakukan pelayanan konseling individual. Pengumpulan data penelitian menggunakan skala evaluasi pelaksanaan layanan konseling individu yang terdiri dari 34 pertanyaan dan pedoman wawancara. Selanjutnta data penelitian dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan pelaksanaan layanan konseling individu di Madrasah Tsanawiyah telah dilaksanakan sebagian dari standar kriteria yang ditetapkan ABKIN. Hal ini berdasarkan hasil evaluasi yang diperoleh yang menunjukkan  rata-rata hasil evaluasi sebesar 132 atau 63%. Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa pelaksanaan layanan konseling individu pada kategori  Cukup Baik (CB)
Peran Konselor dalam Meningkatkan Adaptabilitas Karier Remaja untuk Meghadapi Peluang dan Tantangan Era Society 5.0 Alivia Eka Arianti; Burhani, Iqbal Khoirul; Diniyah, Usrotun; Alamsyah, Muh. Nur
Sehati Abdimas Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Prosiding Sehati Abdimas 2023
Publisher : PPPM POLTESA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47767/sehati_abdimas.v6i1.674

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the role of guidance and counseling teachers in improving the career adaptability of teenagers, which is still low in Indonesia. In this case, the role in question is optimizing the guidance and counseling service strategy and the competencies that guidance and counseling teachers need to have in responding to the challenges and opportunities of the society 5.0 era. In facing the era of society 5.0, the projected educational curriculum has mentioned several main points, namely, character education, the ability to think critically, creatively and innovatively, and the ability to apply technology in this era. In line with the projected education curriculum in Indonesia, there are several challenges in facing the era of society 5.0. One of them is teenagers' unpreparedness in facing career challenges in the future. In this era, teenagers need to have sensitivity in facing challenges into opportunities. One effort that can be made is to increase career adaptability. Career adaptability is an individual's readiness to cope with predictable tasks at work, as well as being able to overcome unexpected situations that may arise as changes in his work conditions. This research uses a qualitative approach with the library research method. The results of this research explain several service strategies that can be implemented by counselors, including involving the use of technology in the guidance process, developing relevant training and education programs, as well as collaborating with related parties to prepare teenagers to face the Society 5.0 era. Apart from that, increasing the competency of guidance and counseling teachers must also be considered so that guidance and counseling teachers can provide the best service to students, especially teenagers, in order to increase the career adaptability of teenagers.
Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Research: Perspective of the Value and Norms of Researchers Nuha, Moch. Syihabudin; Diniyah, Usrotun; Taneo, Mario Martin; Hidayah, Nur; Hotifah, Yuliati
Jurnal Genesis Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 03 (2024): Jurnal Genesis Indonesia
Publisher : The Indonesian Institute of Science and Technology Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56741/jgi.v3i03.714

Abstract

The era of the industrial revolution has entered its peak in 5.0 which is an era where humans coexist full of technology. One of them is artificial intelligence and the products it produces such as ChatGPT, OpenAI, and artificial intelligence in other fields. In this era, humans will be given all kinds of conveniences from technology. The search for truth can be done quickly but less accurately. Artificial intelligence uses big data that will continue to be filled with various knowledge so that in the end intelligence can be utilized properly. The use of artificial intelligence technology in research conducted by researchers should still follow the rules, values, and norms in research. Values and norms in research will lead researchers to be open, fair, responsible, and skeptical of research results. The research method used is a literature study conducted by finding literature sources, reading literature, selecting literature, and analyzing related literature utilizing artificial intelligence in research. The purpose of this study is to find values and norms in research that uses artificial intelligence technology. The result of this study is that a researcher must have the value of objectivity, honesty, fairness, responsibility, stewardship, and openness and continue to develop skepticism, responsibility, ease of understanding, and critical thinking behavior that researchers must have. There are advantages and disadvantages to the use of artificial intelligence in research. The advantages include reference management, search for reference sources, plagiarism checking, and discussions between researchers. While the drawback is the critical thinking ability of researchers, plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification of research data. For this reason, good and responsible researchers must follow the values, values, and norms in research. Researchers must be responsible for the results of their research because the results of their research are a source of knowledge and will be read by readers widely.