Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Transparansi Hukum Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Muhammad Aiman
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENYELESAIAN DAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM KASUS KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS DI KABUPATEN TANJUNG JABUNG BARAT Anggi Purnama Harahap; Muhammad Aiman; Unggul Suryo Ardi; Nilam Sukmawati; Devrian Ali Putra; Amsilatul Khusna
Transparansi Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): TRANSPARANSI HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30737/transparansi.v6i2.4869

Abstract

ABSTRAKStudi ini menganalisis tentang penyelesaian kasus dan pertanggungjawaban hukum atas insiden lalu lintas terkait kelalaian pengemudi di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat. Studi ini menggunakan metodologi sosiologi hukum atau dengan kata lain metodologi hukum empiris dengan teknik analitik kasus. Pengumpulan data melalui observasi, dokumentasi, serta wawancara dari pihak kepolisian penyidik dan Kanit Satlantas Polres Kuala Tungkal, serta dari Pengadilan Negeri Kuala Tungkal yakni panitera dan hakim. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, ada dua cara untuk penyelesaian dan menentukan siapa yang bertanggung jawab secara hukum atas kecelakaan lalu lintas (lakalantas), yaitu melalui litigasi dan non litigasi, yang mana jika pelaku dan korban memilih jalur non litigasi maka penyelesaian diselesaikan diluar persidangan dengan membuat surat pernyataan damai dari kelurahan/desa setempat. Tetapi jika penyelesaian tidak dapat dicapai, masalah tersebut akan diajukan ke Pengadilan Negeri (PN) Kuala Tungkal dan selanjutnya akan dilanjutkan melalui sistem peradilan pidana berdasarkan Undang-Undang RI Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan.Kata Kunci : Pertanggungjawaban Hukum, Kecelakaan, Penyelesaian Kasus.
Perbandingan Pendekatan Pidana Restoratif dan Retributif dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Kejahatan di Indonesia secara Hukum dan Sosial Sitti Munawwarah; Tumian Lian Daya Purba; Kaharuddin Syah; Irsyad Sudirman; Muhammad Aiman
Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i4.7626

Abstract

This article discusses the comparison between restorative and retributive criminal justice systems in resolving criminal cases in Indonesia. The background of this study is the growing urgency to implement a more humanistic criminal justice model that not only focuses on punishment or retaliation, but also emphasizes efforts to restore the losses of victims and achieve reconciliation between perpetrators, victims, and the community. This study aims to analyze the fundamental differences between the two approaches, assess their effectiveness in the Indonesian context, and identify challenges in their implementation. A qualitative approach is applied through literature review and policy analysis by examining legal regulations, law enforcement practices, and implementation experiences across various judicial institutions. The findings reveal that the retributive justice system remains dominant, particularly in cases involving serious and violent crimes. However, the restorative justice model has been increasingly introduced in minor offenses and complaint-based cases, especially through mechanisms such as mediation and community involvement. Restorative justice is found to offer greater potential in reducing recidivism rates, increasing victim satisfaction, and promoting long-term social harmony. Despite its advantages, the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia still faces multiple challenges, including limited regulatory support, lack of public awareness, and resistance within legal institutions due to entrenched punitive mindsets. This study concludes that a balanced integration of restorative and retributive approaches is necessary, depending on the nature and severity of the crime. Strengthening the legal framework, enhancing institutional capacity, and promoting a cultural shift within law enforcement are crucial steps toward establishing restorative justice as a legitimate, humane, and sustainable alternative in Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
The Urgency Of Transparency In State Officials' Spending To Reduce Corruption Rates In Indonesia Desyi Erawati; Raihan Hanasi; Rizal Bakti; Muhammad Aiman; Apriani Riyanti
Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan
Publisher : Yayasan Inovasi Kemajuan Intelektual

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55826/jtmit.v4i3.1447

Abstract

Corruption remains a structural and endemic challenge that hampers economic development, undermines democratic institutions, and erodes public trust in Indonesia. Despite various legal and institutional reforms, the level of corruption, as measured by indices such as Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), has not shown significant, sustained improvement. This study argues that one critical gap in the public accountability system is the lack of adequate, specific transparency in reporting the operational and discretionary expenditures of state officials, particularly at the executive and legislative levels. The purpose of this study is to analyze the theoretical and empirical urgency of implementing a comprehensive transparency regime for official expenditures (e.g., official travel, representation costs, and the use of tactical/operational funds) to prevent and detect corrupt practices early. Drawing on the Theory of Public Accountability and international experience (e.g., Freedom of Information Acts), this study uses a normative-empirical approach to identify a negative correlation between expenditure data disclosure and corruption incidents. The central hypothesis is that spending transparency creates a deterrent effect through heightened public scrutiny, thereby significantly reducing opportunities for misappropriation and strengthening officials' ethical commitment. This finding is crucial for formulating evidence-based anti-corruption policies in Indonesia, particularly regarding revisions to the Public Information Disclosure Law (KIP) and regulations on State Officials' Wealth Reports (LHKPN).
Co-Authors Amsilatul Khusna Anggi Purnama Harahap Desyi Erawati Devrian Ali Putra Irsyad Sudirman Nilam Sukmawati Raihan Hanasi Ramli, Kaharuddin Riyanti, Apriani Rizal Bakti Sitti Munawwarah Tumian Lian Daya Purba Unggul Suryo Ardi