Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Pengangkatan Pemimpin Non Muslim di Era Modern Menurut Ulama: Teks dan Konteks Sabri; Arsal; Efendi, Zul
Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Indra Institute Research & Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58707/jipm.v5i1.1093

Abstract

Non-Muslim leadership in Muslim-majority societies is a complex and dynamic topic, involving debates between classical and modern scholarly perspectives. The main issue addressed in this study is the differing views on the permissibility of non-Muslims holding leadership positions in Muslim societies and the relevance of leadership criteria in Islam. This study aims to explore the views of classical and modern scholars regarding non-Muslim leadership and to analyze the leadership criteria outlined in Islamic literature. The research method used is qualitative descriptive, with a library research approach. Data were gathered from various literary sources, including books, journals, and academic articles, and were analyzed in depth.The findings show that classical scholars generally reject non-Muslim leadership based on explicit prohibitions in religious texts. In contrast, modern scholars provide a contextual interpretation, stating that such prohibitions apply only in times of conflict or hostility. In peaceful and democratic contexts, non-Muslim leadership is considered acceptable. Additionally, this study highlights Islamic leadership criteria, which include faith, piety, physical and spiritual health, honesty, competence, justice, professionalism, responsibility, and trustworthiness.The conclusion of this study is that the debate on non-Muslim leadership requires an inclusive and contextual approach, given the social-political complexities of modern societies. Meanwhile, the criteria for Islamic leadership remain relevant in ensuring that leaders possess the integrity and capability to meet the needs of society justly and effectively.
Controversies Over Cross-Religious Greetings: Fatwa Discourse and Religious Moderation in Indonesia Arsal; Imran, Maizul
Moderatio: Jurnal Moderasi Beragama Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Moderatio: Jurnal Moderasi Beragama
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat of Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/moderatio.v5i1.10186

Abstract

This study examines the legal status of cross-religious greetings through a textual legal interpretation analysis based on fatwas and the concept of religious moderation. This practice, often observed in official events, has sparked significant debate among Muslim scholars and government officials. The controversy escalated following a fatwa issued by the East Java Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI), which declared cross-religious greetings haram due to concerns about the potential mixing of beliefs. This stance was countered by the Ministry of Religious Affairs, which argued that such greetings promote interreligious harmony and are therefore permissible. Employing a literature-based approach and legal interpretation theory, this research provides an academic perspective without intending to discredit any party. The study concludes that cross-religious greetings are permissible (mubah) when intended to uphold national harmony and religious pluralism. It highlights the importance of balancing adherence to religious principles with the need for societal unity and coexistence in a pluralistic nation.
Implementasi PERBUB Pasaman Barat Nomor 47 Tahun 2022 Tentang Penataan Wilayah Kejorongan Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah Tanfidziyah (Studi Nagari Limau Purut Kecamatan Kinali Kabupaten Pasaman Barat) Irwanto, Aditia; Wirman, Hardi Putra; Arsal; Dantes, Raymond
Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 5 No 3: Desember (2025)
Publisher : Arden Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57250/ajsh.v5i3.1816

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh diterbitkannya Peraturan Bupati Pasaman Barat Nomor 47 Tahun 2022 tentang Penataan Wilayah Kejorongan di Nagari Limau Purut. Dalam kebijakan tersebut, wilayah Nagari Limau Purut yang semula terdiri dari satu kejorongan, dipecah menjadi tiga kejorongan. Namun, hingga saat ini, kejorongan baru yang terbentuk belum memiliki kepala jorong yang definitif. Kondisi ini berdampak pada kurang optimalnya pelayanan publik kepada masyarakat di wilayah kejorongan baru tersebut. Akibatnya, masyarakat belum sepenuhnya merasakan pelayanan pemerintahan yang efektif dan merata, sebagaimana yang diharapkan dari penataan wilayah tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana implementasi dari Peraturan Bupati Pasaman Barat Nomor 47 Tahun 2022 Tentang Penataan Wilayah Kejorongan di Nagari Limau Purut dan bagaimana implementasi dari Peraturan Bupati ini jika ditinjau dari perspektif fiqih siyasah tanfidziyyah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang dilakukan di Nagari Limau Purut, Kecamatan Kinali, Kabupaten Pasaman Barat. Dengan menggunakan metode wawancara dan dokumentasi. Sumber data primer dari penelitian ini adalah Badan Musyawarah (Bamus), PJ Wali Nagari Limau Purut, Masyarakat Nagari Limau Purut, sedangkan untuk sumber data sekundernya adalah sumber-sumber yang telah ada dalam bentuk dokumen berupa undang-undang, buku, skripsi terdahulu, jurnal dan artikel yang relevan untuk dibahas. Dalam menganalisis data, penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif dan metode deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah : Pertama, implementasi Peraturan Bupati Pasaman Barat Nomor 47 Tahun 2022 belum berjalan secara optimal. Hal ini disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor, antara lain belum terlaksananya pelayanan publik secara maksimal karena belum adanya kepala jorong di kejorongan yang baru dibentuk, keterbatasan sarana dan prasarana penunjang, serta minimnya komunikasi antara pemerintah dan masyarakat. Akibatnya, masyarakat belum mengetahui secara menyeluruh keberadaan peraturan tersebut dan belum sepenuhnya merasakan manfaat yang diharapkan dari kebijakan tersebut. Kedua, implementasi Peraturan Bupati Pasaman Barat Nomor 47 Tahun 2022 Tentang Penataan Wilayah Kejorongan di Nagari Limau Purut sudah sejalan dengan  konsep fiqih siyasah tanfidziyyah yakni mengejar kemaslahatan umat dan menolak kemudaratan.
MILKU AL-YAMĪN: Diskursus dalam Al-Qur’an antara Teks dan Konteks Hendri; Arsal
AL ITQAN: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an Vol 11 No 2 (2025): Al ITQAN: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an
Publisher : STAI AL-ANWAR SARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47454/alitqan.v11i2.1149

Abstract

The relationship between the text and its context in the term Milku Al-Yamīn is often understood differences and shifts in meaning from classical to contemporary times, which are inseparable from social factors and thus influence as a form of ownership of slaves or prisoners of war in pre-Islamic Arab society. However, this interpretation often causes debate when confronted with modern human values. This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature study and thematic interpretation (maudhū‘i) method, combined with socio-historical analysis and contextual hermeneutics. The results show that the textual understanding of Milku Al-Yamīn in the Qur'an cannot be separated from the social and cultural context of the society when the verses were revealed. The Qur'an does not directly legalize slavery, but takes an evolutionary path by emphasizing liberation, justice, and respect for human dignity. In the modern context, scholars believe that Milku Al-Yamīn needs to be reinterpreted as a symbol of social transformation towards the elimination of oppression and inequality. Thus, through a reading that takes into account both the text and context, Milku Al-Yamīn is understood not as a legitimization of slavery, but as part of the moral and humanitarian process promoted by the Qur'an.
Pemenuhan Nafkah Keluarga terhadap Suami Pemburu Babi di Nagari Malalak Utara dan Dampaknya terhadap Keutuhan Rumah Tangga Ifdal Hamdi; Arsal
AHKAM Vol 5 No 4 (2026): AHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.11890

Abstract

Although baburu babi has long been part of the social activities of the Minangkabau community, studies examining its relationship with family maintenance and marital stability from the perspective of Islamic Family Law remain limited. This study aimed to analyze the provision of family maintenance by husbands who engage in pig hunting and the impact of baburu babi activities on marital stability in Nagari Malalak Utara. This field study employed a descriptive qualitative approach involving four informants, including three wives whose husbands participated in baburu babi activities. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation and were subsequently analyzed descriptively and analytically using deductive, inductive, and comparative reasoning. The findings showed that, for some husbands, baburu babi activities constituted a source of income used to meet basic needs, children’s educational expenses, and household needs, although the income earned was irregular. These activities could also reduce time spent together, attention, and affection and cause anxiety among wives. In some families, these circumstances did not lead to divorce because they were supported by communication and trust, whereas in certain cases, they triggered disputes that ultimately resulted in divorce. This study concludes that baburu babi activities have varying economic and relational implications for family life. These findings extend the scholarship on Islamic Family Law by connecting maintenance obligations, sociocultural activities, and marital stability within the context of local communities.
Analisis Penetapan Pengadilan Agama Nomor 44/PDT.P/2025/PA.LB tentang Isbat Nikah Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Uswatun Hasanah; Arsal
AHKAM Vol 5 No 4 (2026): AHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.12034

Abstract

Isbat nikah for marriages conducted without a legitimate wali nasab or wali hakim remains an issue in Islamic family law, particularly when converts to Islam face specific circumstances in fulfilling guardianship requirements. However, studies on judges’ considerations in validating marriages involving a wali muhakkam and their conformity with Islamic family law remain limited. This study aimed to analyze the considerations of the judges of the Lubuk Basung Religious Court in granting an application for isbat nikah through Ruling Number 44/Pdt.P/2025/PA.LB and to examine the ruling from the perspective of Islamic family law. The study employed a qualitative approach using library research and a document study design. The primary data source was Ruling Number 44/Pdt.P/2025/PA.LB of the Lubuk Basung Religious Court, while the secondary data sources included relevant classical and contemporary Islamic jurisprudential literature. Data were collected through documentary and literature studies and subsequently analyzed descriptively, deductively, inductively, and comparatively. The results showed that the judges granted the application for isbat nikah based on the fulfillment of the pillars and requirements of marriage, documentary evidence, and witness testimony. The judges also considered the circumstances of Petitioner II as a convert to Islam who encountered difficulties in obtaining a wali hakim by applying considerations of maslahah and the legal maxim dar’u al-mafasid muqaddamun ‘ala jalbi al-masalih. Nevertheless, the use of a wali muhakkam was considered inappropriate from the perspective of Indonesian positive law because the applicable provisions recognize only a wali nasab and a wali hakim. This study enriches the literature on isbat nikah by demonstrating the normative tension among Islamic jurisprudential considerations, public interest, and legal certainty in religious court practice. Future research is recommended to compare several similar rulings and examine them from the perspective of maqasid al-shari’ah.