Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Isrāīliyyāt Discourse in Virtual Space: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Gus Baha's Interpretation in Santri Gayeng YouTube Channel Farahdiba, Ani Nabila; Alfarisi, Ahmad; Ibrahim, Aji Muhammad; Kamil, Ahmad Zaidanil
Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol 5, No 2 (2023): Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hadis
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/mashdar.v5i2.7185

Abstract

This paper analyzes KH. Ahmad Bahauddin Nursalim's (Gus Baha') interpretation of Surah an-Naml verses 39-40 about the transfer of the throne of Queen Bilqis to the presence of Prophet Solomon a.s. This research is worth reviewing because there is a rejection of the interpretation by Gus Baha' in the Tafsir Jalālayn by Jalāluddīn al-Mahalli and Jalāluddīn al-Suyuṭi. This analytical descriptive study is derived from online media, namely the interpretation study by Gus Baha' published on the Santri Gayeng YouTube platform, making it a virtual ethnography.\. The author uses Labov and Waletzky's narrative structure analysis approach to explore Gus Baha's five interpretive structures, namely 1) Orientation, 2) Climax, 3) Evaluation, 4) Resolution, and 5) Coda. This study's results show that Gus Baha' rejects Jalaludin al-Suyuṭi's interpretation, which explains that Bilqis' throne emerged from under the chair. According to him, this does not make sense, which is isrāīliyyāt. Despite rejecting this interpretation, Gus Baha' gives his audience freedom regarding their belief in isrāīliyyāt. Gus Baha's rejection of isrāīliyyāt is based on his figure, who is a rationalist. This research also proves that the tradition of the cult of a tafsir essay that is quite phenomenal among pesantren is no longer done. Gus Baha' has succeeded in breaking the habit of pesantren in sacralizing a work of interpretation with his efforts to review the tradition of reading the book. The review was carried out by criticizing, reflecting, and understanding more deeply
Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal High Orther Thinking Skill Pada Materi Barisan Aritmatika Wahyuni, Indah; Yuliatin, Umi; Munawaroh, Lailatul; Budijayanti, Ike; Alfarisi, Ahmad
Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Volume 8 Nomor 1
Publisher : Mathematics Education Study Program

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/cendekia.v8i1.2971

Abstract

Seiring berkembangnya zaman siswa dituntut untuk berpikir kritis tidak sekedar penguasaa konsep-konsep. Dalam artikel ini peneliti menganalisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dalam memecahkan soal HOTS serta faktor yang mempengaruhi siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal HOTS. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif yang mendeskripsikan kemampuan berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal HOTS serta apa saja faktor yang mempengaruhi kemampuan berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal HOTS. Subjek dari penelitian ini yaitu siswa SMAN 5 Jember kelas X sebanyak sepuluh siswa. Hasil utama penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada sampel siswa yang menjadi subjek penelitian, hanya satu siswa yang memperoleh nilai sangat tinggi, dua siswa memperoleh nilai sedang, dan tujuh siswa memperoleh nilai kemampuan berpikir kritis rendah. Dengan adanya penelitian ini data yang dihasilkan dapat menjadi bahan pertimbangan untuk mengetahui sejauh mana kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Serta memikirkan solusi untuk faktor yang mempengaruhi rendahnya kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik.
Reform of Guardianship in Islamic Family Law in Tunisia, Egypt, and Indonesia Iqbal, Muhammad; Wildan, Rahmad; Alfarisi, Ahmad
USRATY : Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Editions July-December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/usraty.v3i2.9759

Abstract

The reform of guardianship has become a focal issue in Islamic family law, particularly regarding the balance between religious authority and gender equality. This study aims to analyze the transformation of guardianship law in Tunisia, Egypt, and Indonesia through a comparative perspective grounded in contemporary Islamic jurisprudence. Employing a qualitative approach, this research explores legal documents, statutory frameworks, and scholarly discourses to examine how each country reinterprets the concept of guardianship within its sociopolitical and religious context. The findings reveal that Tunisia, influenced by progressive legal reform, has eliminated the obligatory role of the male guardian in marriage, redefining guardianship as a partnership based on mutual consent. Egypt retains the classical fiqh framework but applies flexible judicial interpretations to safeguard women’s autonomy within the boundaries of Sharia. Indonesia adopts a balanced approach by preserving the guardian’s authority under religious principles while harmonizing it with state regulation through the Compilation of Islamic Law. The study concludes that these variations reflect different paths of Islamic legal adaptation driven by modernity, political transformation, and gender discourse. This research contributes to the development of Islamic legal thought by demonstrating how contemporary jurisprudence can respond critically to evolving demands for equality and justice in Muslim family law.