Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL-Daulah MILLATI: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam el hisbah: Journal of Islamic Economic Law
Supardin, Muhammad Ikhlas
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Standardisasi Halal dan Prosedur Sertifikasi Halal di Indonesia dan Thailand ikhsan, ikhsan gasali; Supardin, Muhammad Ikhlas
el hisbah Journal of Islamic Economic Law Vol 4 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/elhisbah.v4i1.8489

Abstract

The increase in tourists after Covid-19 has begun to be seen in several countries, this clearly affects the economic growth of tourist destination countries. Indonesia and Thailand are two countries that have shown significant development in terms of tourism. This study aims to examine the standards and methods of halal certification in tourist destination countries such as Indonesia and Thailand. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive-comparative method. This approach was chosen to gain a deep understanding of the regulation of halal fatwas and the procedures for granting halal certification in Indonesia and Thailand. This study is library research, where data is collected through literature searches, documents. Data analysis is carried out descriptively-comparatively, namely by systematically describing the systems of each country, then comparing the legal structure, religious authority, and applicable certification mechanisms. The results of the study show that the executor of the task of inspecting halal food in Indonesia is the MUI through LPPOM-MUI. Furthermore, the government has established the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency (BPJPH) which is tasked with issuing halal certificates. On the other hand, Thailand has two institutions that focus on product halalness, namely the Halal Standards Institute of Thailand and the Halal Science Center of Chulalongkorn University (HSC-CU).
LEGAL REASONING BY JUDGES IN THE DECISION OF THE RELIGIOUS COURT IN THE DKI JAKARTA AREA REGARDING SHARIA FINANCING Supardin, Muhammad Ikhlas; Mubarok, Jaih; Muslimin, JM; Nasril, Muhammad; Amir, Rahma
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 10 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v10i1.10917

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the differences in Religious Court rulings on Sharia economic cases based on judges' ijtihad in interpreting and constructing laws. The legal interpretation conducted by judges represents ijtihad in uncovering legal solutions to Sharia economic issues found in Religious Court rulings in the DKI Jakarta region from 2016 to 2022. Judges’ ijtihad in legal discovery employs various methods or approaches, resulting in differences in rulings. The conceptual approaches utilized in this study include the statute approach and the case approach. The data sources for this research comprise Religious Court decisions in the DKI Jakarta region from 2016 to 2022 concerning Sharia economic cases, including murabahah, musyarakah, mudarabah, and istisna contracts. The data analysis technique employed in this research is descriptive qualitative analysis. The findings of this study demonstrate that judges’ ijtihad in legal discovery is grounded in statutory regulations and various relevant legal sources. Judges’ legal reasoning in examining, adjudicating, and delivering rulings applies different interpretative methods or approaches, leading to variations in rulings on similar Sharia economic cases. The ijtihad or legal reasoning methods used by judges are categorized into juridical interpretation methods, including grammatical, systematic, and authentic interpretations. Additionally, teleological interpretation is the sole legal reasoning method used by judges as a contextual approach, incorporating empirical evidence based on statutory provisions.
Sengketa Pembiayaan Akad Murabahah: Analisis Komparasi Supardin, Muhammad Ikhlas; JM Muslimin
Al-Daulah : Journal of Criminal Law and State Administration Law Vol 11 No 2 (2022): (December)
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Tatanegara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/ad.vi.30519

Abstract

This study aims to analyze comparation of the South Jakarta Religious Court in deciding cases no. 1957/Pdt.G/2018/PA.JS and no. 407/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JS. This research based on normative legal, known as doctrinal legal research. The approaches used in this study were the statute approach, case approach and comparative approach. The results of this study indicate that the two decisions are based on legal considerations by the judge by referring to legal arguments and related laws. The judge granted the plaintiff's request in decision no. 1957/Pdt.G/2018/Pa.Js. Otherwise the decision no. 407/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Js, the judge rejected the plaintiff's application in its entirety. Both of decisions are included in the case of deffered payment financing, but there are differences in the legal considerations by the judges of the South Jakarta Court so that there are different decision. Keywords: Dispute Settlement; Deffered Payment Financing; Religious Court Decision
The Government’s Role in the Implementation of Religious Tolerance Practices in Southeast Asia Mala, Fiki Khoirul; Supardin, Muhammad Ikhlas; Wahid, Muhammad Aminul
Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Decolonization of Islamic Thought, Social and Humanities Studies
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/mlt.v7i1.6739

Abstract

The dynamics of Islam within the framework of Islamic majority and minority groups cannot be separated from the government’s role in maintaining religious tolerance. Minority groups such as Moro Muslims in the Philippines, Patani Muslims in Thailand, and Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar have illustrated the government’s minimal role in resolving conflicts between the majority and minorities. Therefore, this paper discusses the Muslim majority and minority groups in several countries and their relationship with the government to implement the practice of religious tolerance. This article uses a library method with a content analysis approach from relevant articles related to the government’s role in implementing religious tolerance practices in Southeast Asia. The study shows that the existence of Islam as a belief of a person and the people who are part of the state and government cannot be separated from one another. In other words, the state’s support for its people of various ethnicity, cultures, and religions will contribute to the peace of the state and the creation of state stability. The position of the majority and minority in the religious process will also influence religious institutions socially, economically, and culturally. Showing the expression of diversity in religious practices in the Southeast Asia region will create a new order in creating peace.
Co-Authors ikhsan, ikhsan gasali Jaih Mubarok JM Muslimin JM Muslimin Mala, Fiki Khoirul Nasril, Muhammad Rahma Amir, Rahma Wahid, Muhammad Aminul