Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Akibat Hukum Dari Jual Beli yang Dibuat Dihadapan PPAT Terhadap Pembeli yang Tidak Dapat Menguasai Objek Jual Beli Septiana, Risa; M. Sudirman; Erny Kencanawati
Jurnal Gagasan Hukum Vol. 4 No. 02 (2022): JURNAL GAGASAN HUKUM
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Lancang Kuning

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/jgh.v4i2.12937

Abstract

Saat ini, kebutuhan terhadap akta autentik sebagai pembuktian semakin meningkat seiring dengan meningkatnya hubungan bisnis di berbagai bidang usaha baik dari skala lokal hingga internasional. Kebanyakan masyarakat memproleh tanah yaitu dengan jual beli. Dalam mencegah masalah tanah agar tidak terjadi konflik di masyarakat maka diperlukan adanya pengaturan, penguasaan dan penggunaan tanah yang diatur dalam UUPA. Penelitian ini menggunkan pendekatan hukum yuridis normatif dengan studi pustaka yang cukup sehingga data sekunder juga diperlukan. tanah. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa dalam hal pembeli yang tidak dapat menguasai objek jual beli berarti pembeli belum memperoleh kepastian hukum akan objek jual beli meskipun jual beli tersebut dibuat dihadapan PPAT, sehingga hal ini dapat disengketakan oleh pembeli untuk memperoleh haknya.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PEMBIAYAAN MUSYARAKAH PADA PERBANKAN SYARIAH TERKAIT EKSISTENSI UTANG ANTARA NASABAH DAN BANK Anindya Shamara Arminawan; Yuhelson, Yuhelson; Erny Kencanawati
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 10: Maret 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i10.9886

Abstract

Musyarakah is a cooperative agreement between two or more people to carry out a certain business, where each party contributes to funds or charity with the agreement that the profits or risks will be shared together in accordance with the initial agreement. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the existence of debt between customers and banks related to musyarakah financing in Islamic banking followed by debt recognition and how to realize legal certainty related to customers and banks related to musyarakah financing in Islamic banking. The theories used in this research are the theory of legal certainty and sharia banking theory.The research method used is the normative juridical approach method supported by empirical, namely research conducted based on the main legal material by examining theories, concepts, legal principles, applicable laws and regulations and other information related to this research.Musyarakah is a form of cooperation or partnership financing, so there is no existence of debt and credit between the customer and the bank in this financing. However, debt can be formed if the customer makes a default, namely not fulfilling the things that have been agreed in the contract. This is regulated in PSAK 106 where all customer obligations related to the financing in the Bank's books will be transferred as debt. Based on the research, financing with a musyarakah contract is accompanied by a debt clause or debt acknowledgment contained in the standard contract prepared by the bank. With this debt recognition clause, the essence of the musyarakah contract can change from being a cooperation contract to a debt and credit contract and there will be debt existence from the beginning of the contract. However, the inclusion of the debt acknowledgment clause cannot be said to deviate from the provisions because the Financial Services Authority (OJK) Regulation stipulates that banks are allowed to make a letter of acknowledgment of receipt of business funds and a letter of acknowledgment of obligation to return the business funds.
TANGGUNG JAWAB AHLI WARIS NOTARIS YANG MENINGGAL DUNIA TERHADAP PROTOKOL NOTARIS DI KAITKAN DENGAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM NOTARIS PEMEGANG PROTOKOL Syauqi, Alfa; Erny Kencanawati; Yudha Cahya Kumala
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 4: September 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In carrying out their duties, a Notary is guided by the rules inherent in the Notary's Office, as stipulated in the Notary Law and other related regulations. A Notary is a public official obligated to maintain and guarantee the accuracy of the Notary's protocol. When a Notary dies, the protocol must be handed over to another Notary to receive it to ensure its certainty. However, this protocol often raises issues due to unfinished work or lawsuits regarding the deceased Notary's protocol. The research problem is formulated as follows: How are the responsibilities of the deceased Notary's heirs and their obligations regarding the Notary's protocol regulated? And what is the legal certainty of the deceased Notary's protocol for the Notary receiving the protocol? The legal theories applied as analytical tools are Hans Kelsen's theory of responsibility and Gustav Radbruch's theory of legal certainty. The method used in this research is a normative juridical research type, namely library legal research or tertiary data. The writing approaches used are the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, the analytical approach, and the case approach. The legal material collection technique was carried out by identifying and inventorying positive legal regulations, books, journals, and other legal sources. The legal material analysis technique employed grammatical interpretation, systematic interpretation, and legal construction methods. The research findings indicate that the heirs of a deceased notary are responsible for submitting the notary's protocol to the notary receiving the protocol through the Regional Supervisory Board and are responsible for other matters related to the protocol. To ensure legal certainty for the responsible heirs and the notary who assists the heirs in resolving any issues that arise, regulations governing this matter are necessary.
Kepastian Hukum Atas Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Notaris yang Disangkal dalam Proses Peradilan Elena Kristianto; Erny Kencanawati; Khoirul Anwar
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.6854

Abstract

Notarial deeds as authentic instruments hold a crucial role in Indonesia’s civil law evidence system, providing perfect proof under Article 1868 of the Civil Code. However, in practice, such deeds are often denied by one party in court, raising debates about the certainty of their evidentiary power. This study examines the legal consequences of denying a notarial deed for the parties in litigation and the assurance of legal certainty for those holding such deeds. Using R. Soeroso’s Theory of Legal Consequences and Jan Michael Otto’s Theory of Legal Certainty, this normative juridical research employs statutory, conceptual, analytical, and case approaches, with literature-based data collection and interpretative legal analysis. The findings reveal that denial of a notarial deed may create new legal relationships, alter good-faith relations into disputes, and result in sanctions imposed by court rulings. Meanwhile, legal certainty remains guaranteed, as authentic deed regulations are clear, binding, and enforceable, serving as a guideline in resolving disputes and upholding sanctions.