Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

ANALISIS TINGKAT KEPERCAYAAN PUBLIK TERHADAP MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI PASCA PUTUSAN NOMOR 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Yuliana, Adelia; Tuasalamony, Adzra Ardelia; Al Fath; Parhusip, Alizcia Dora; Febriani, Anggie; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 3 No 2 (2024): Volume 3, Nomor 2, April 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v3i2.9095

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 is considered to have a conflict of interest due to the involvement of Chief Justice Anwar Usman's family with one of the parties, raising doubts about the court's independence and integrity. This study aims to examine the impact of this decision on public perception and trust in the Constitutional Court. Using empirical legal research with an interdisciplinary and conflict approach, the study distributed online questionnaires through Google Forms to explore the impact of that Decision on public perception and trust. The results indicate that the decision to set the minimum age limit for presidential and vice-presidential candidates at 40 years old has a significant impact on the level of public trust in the Constitutional Court. The Spearman correlation test shows a very strong and significant relationship, with a coefficient of determination of 0.780, indicating that 78% of the variability in the level of public trust can be explained by this decision. However, there is still 22% variability influenced by other factors that need to be studied further to get a more complete picture of public trust in the Constitutional Court.
Analisis Peran Etika dan Profesionalisme Polisi Sebagai Penegak Hukum Dalam Menjaga Kepercayaan Masyarakat: Studi Kasus Ferdy Sambo Widiyanto, Alif Putra; Febriani, Anggie; Julio, Christopher Elia; Rahmawati, Dian Istimeisyah; Nandita, Lufna; Friyadhi, Naufal Farros; Tanjung, Salsas Bila Juniyanti; M, Mulyadi
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 2, No 10 (2025): May
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15369303

Abstract

This study examines the role of ethics and professionalism of the police as law enforcers in maintaining public trust, with a case study of ethical and legal violations committed by Ferdy Sambo. This case highlights the gap between public expectations of the integrity of the police and the reality of practices in the field, which has an impact on the crisis of public trust in the police institution. The study uses a descriptive qualitative method through literature studies and data analysis from various news sources and related literature. The findings show that violations of the code of ethics and abuse of power by officers, especially in the case of Ferdy Sambo, worsen the image and legitimacy of the police institution. The failure of the internal monitoring system and the weak implementation of sanctions for ethical violations are the main factors in the decline in public trust. This study emphasizes the importance of implementing the principles of integrity, justice, and responsibility as stipulated in Law No. 2 of 2002 and Regulation of the Chief of Police No. 14 of 2011. This study also provides strategic recommendations to strengthen the monitoring system and enforcement of the code of ethics in order to restore public trust. Thus, improving ethics and professionalism within the police force is key to restoring the legitimacy and public trust in the police institution in Indonesia.
Studi Komparasi Mediasi dan Konsiliasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pada Korporasi Hermawati, Mutiara; Rinanti, Pitra; Marito, Eugina Evita; Loren, Medina; Febriani, Anggie
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15481988

Abstract

In the corporate world, disputes between parties often require efficient resolution methods outside of litigation. Two commonly used mechanisms are mediation and conciliation. Although both fall under alternative dispute resolution (ADR), they differ fundamentally, particularly in the role of the third party. A mediator remains neutral and facilitates negotiation without offering solutions, while a conciliator takes a more active role by providing written proposals to the parties. This article explores the differences, similarities, and legal basis of both mechanisms to offer clearer understanding for business actors in choosing the most suitable resolution method.