Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Yuridis Peristiwa Revenge Porn dalam Konteks Undang-Undang ITE atau Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Nurhasanah, Hikmah; Nabilla, Anissa; Adelita, Nabila Putri; Haryani, Diah Septi; A, Abraham; A, Alreindra; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11206692

Abstract

Revenge porn, the illegal and unauthorized distribution of private sexual content, is an increasingly worrying issue in today's digital era. The purpose of this article is to conduct a legal review of the phenomenon of revenge pornography, with a focus on the existing legal framework in Indonesia, in particular the Electronic Information Transactions (ITE) Law and the Sexual Violence Crimes Law. This article uses a legal approach and critical analysis to explore the challenges and obstacles in handling revenge pornography cases within the existing legal framework and how to protect victims and enforce the law more effectively. Consider possible improvements in your efforts.
Peran Negara, Masyarakat, dan Keluarga untuk menanggulangi Bullying dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Anak Paramesti, Nirwasita Zada; Prawira, Rio Nusa; Azahra, Musdalifah; Farandy, Farrel; Andhiyo, Immanuel Given Bintang; Izzati, Aulia Putri; Haryani, Diah Septi; Mahardika, Agus; Ardhika, Wafiy Ahmad; Mulyadi, Mulyadi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): June
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2545

Abstract

Bullying adalah tindakan seseorang atau kelompok yang melakukan kekerasan ataupun perilaku yang menyebabkan rasa takut atau tidak nyaman kepada korban yang mengalaminya baik secara lisan, fisik, maupun secara mental. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor terjadinya bullying, mengidentifikasi peran negara, masyarakat, serta keluarga dalam penanganan bullying pada anak dengan regulasi yang relevan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan relevan dengan permasalahan pada penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa seorang anak dapat menjadi pelaku bullying, penyebabnya adalah keluarga yang tidak harmonis, kesenioritasan dalam lingkungan sekolah, pengaruh dari teman sebaya, pengabaian sekolah terhadap pelaku bullying hingga ketidakmampuan anak untuk mengelola emosi. Negara dapat membuat kebijakan legislasi yang komprehensif mengatur tentang perlindungan anak, termasuk mengenai bullying. Masyarakat bisa menciptakan lingkungan yang ramah, dan damai serta memberikan edukasi dan dukungan sosial kepada anak. Sehingga anak merasa aman yang dampaknya memberikan rasa dicintai dan dihargai. Serta peran keluarga yang sangat penting karena apa yang orang tua ajarkan kepada anaknya maka akan langsung ditiru oleh sang anak. Keluarga harus bisa menjadi pendengar sekaligus teman bagi anak serta harus terbuka atas kritik dan saran dari anaknya. Keluarga harus memenuhi hak-hak anak supaya menimbulkan keharmonisan dalam keluarga yang berpengaruh terhadap perkembangan anak.
Dilema Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum dalam Era Digital: Studi Kasus Pelanggaran Kode Etik oleh Oknum Penegak Hukum pada Kasus Ferdy Sambo dan Pembunuhan Brigadir J (2022) Puspadewi, Gladys Trias; Purba, Moses Frederick; Alvito, Haykal Rizki; Haryani, Diah Septi; Valentara, Aqiila Banyu; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15529725

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology has had a significant impact on various sectors, including the legal world. The digital era has given rise to various new challenges for law enforcers, especially related to violations of the code of ethics and professional responsibility. This study aims to examine the ethical dilemma and responsibility of the legal profession in dealing with violations of the code of ethics by law enforcers in the digital era. This study uses a qualitative approach by analyzing various cases of violations of the code of ethics involving law enforcers, as well as their impact on the credibility and integrity of the legal profession in society. The results of the study indicate that the digital era exacerbates the spread of inaccurate information and often worsens the image of the legal profession. Enforcement of the code of ethics of the legal profession requires adaptation to technological developments and the implementation of stricter supervision. This study also highlights the importance of the role of supervisory institutions and professional education in strengthening commitment to the ethics of the legal profession in the digital era. It is hoped that the findings of this study can provide insight into the development of legal profession policies and practices that are more responsive to changes in the times.
Judicial Reasoning in Appellate Sentencing for Major Corruption Cases Haryani, Diah Septi; Mulyadi, Mulyadi
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.49042

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the judicial reasoning behind the enhancement of an appellate sentence in a major corruption case in Indonesia and to assess whether the judges’ considerations aligned with the principles of due process of law, proportionality, and legal certainty. The research method used was a normative juridical approach employing statutory, case, and comparative analyses. Data were obtained through library research involving primary legal materials, secondary literature, and tertiary references, and were analyzed qualitatively through a descriptive-analytical technique. The novelty in this research lies in its focused examination of appellate judges’ authority to impose heavier sentences in corruption cases, particularly by identifying the juridical foundation used to justify sentence enhancement and by evaluating its coherence with fundamental principles of criminal procedure. Unlike previous studies that primarily discuss corruption sentencing disparities or political influences on judicial decisions, this research provides a detailed analysis of how appellate judicial reasoning functions as a mechanism to uphold substantive justice. Based on the research, it was concluded that the appellate judges grounded their decision on legally valid evidence and carefully weighed both aggravating and mitigating factors, including the scale of state losses, societal impact, and the defendant’s cooperative conduct. The enhanced sentence was consistent with proportionality, due process, and legal certainty, and represents an important precedent for strengthening judicial integrity and advancing reform within Indonesia’s criminal justice system.