Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Tren Fintech Terhadap Crowdfunding dan Blockchain di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla; Seraf, Yudea Maruli; Gracy, Clony Christy; Nugroho, Andriyanto Adhi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12532956

Abstract

Through research In this article, readers can understand FinTech and its innovations, such as understanding Crowdfunding and Blockchain. Talking about innovation in FinTech in a nutshell is an important part of finance, including asset aggregation, market making, risk management, and information clearing. Then this article also discusses the scope of crowdfunding and blockchain. The discussion regarding crowdfunding points to financial technology in the form of fintech innovation which does not eliminate the need for financial intermediaries. The aim of this research is to understand the topic of Financial Technology and the development of FinTech and show readers that modern studies of FinTech are fragmented with a controlled and structured theoretical basis. Through this research, the author uses normative research, which means that problems will be raised, discussed and explained focusing on the application of rules or norms in positive law in Indonesia.
Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pencegahan Kasus Deepfake Serta Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla; Setyarini, Astri Dewi; Parlagutan, Dodi; Rafli, Muhammad; Mahendra, Rayhan Syahbana; Nugroho, Andriyanto Adhi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12508126

Abstract

This research will examine various legal aspects related to Deepfake Porn, including the role of law in protecting individual privacy, copyright, and cyber security. In addition, this research will also explore the potential for public awareness education as a preventative measure by increasing public understanding of the risks of Deepfakes and how to protect themselves from possible misuse of this technology. The research method that can be used to analyze efforts to prevent deepfake pornography and educate public awareness in the digital environment is the normative juridical research method. The steps in this method include identifying the legal problem to be researched, collecting data through searching regulations and literature related to the problem. Protection of personal data in the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is very important to avoid threats such as deepfake videos. Personal data, including personal photos, must be legally protected. Privacy is divided into three types: Physical Privacy, Information Privacy, and Organizational Privacy, which includes protection of individual communications, behavior and identity. In Europe, citizens can exercise the "right to be forgotten" (RTBF) right to delete personal information from the internet, as experienced by Mario Costeja Gonzalez in 2010. The EU updated the RTBF rules in the GDPR since May 2018. Indonesia also has a similar concept in the ITE Law Article 26 paragraphs (3) and (4), although the implementation is different and faces challenges in dealing with deepfakes.
Reformulasi UU ITE terhadap Artificial Intelligence Dibandingkan dengan Uni Eropa dan China AI Act Regulation Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10578

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal vacuum in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) related to the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) in Indonesia in the context of deepfake. This research is motivated by the existence of several regulations on AI, these regulations are not sufficient to regulate thoroughly, especially regarding the technical aspects, implementation, and supervision of AI. So, the study to further analyze the urgency of reformulating the ITE Law due to the absence of specific regulations that are able to close the legal vacuum related to deepfake. The reformulation of the ITE Law is an urgent need to address the threat of deepfake, an AI-based content manipulation technology that is increasingly prevalent in Indonesia, deepfake creates manipulative content without the victim's consent, causing psychological harm, social stigma, and serious challenges in privacy and security. This research is included in normative juridical writing using a statutory approach through analysis of laws and derivative regulations and a comparative approach through analysis of the EU AI Act and China's regulations to provide reformulation suggestions. The results show that there is a legal vacuum that has not specifically regulated AI, which risks the misuse of technology and hampers legal certainty. Comparing the EU and China AI Acts, key findings include the need to adopt the basic principles of the EU AI Act, such as transparency, security, and fairness, as well as risk classification for AI systems. The current AI Act does not regulate important aspects such as labeling, reporting mechanisms, and supervision of high risks in AI systems, and it is recommended to establish a supervisory body responsible for AI risk management. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk menganalisis kekosongan hukum dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) terkait regulasi kecerdasan buatan (AI) di Indonesia dalam konteks deepfake. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi dengan adanya beberapa aturan tentang AI, regulasi ini belum cukup mengatur secara menyeluruh, terutama terkait aspek teknis, pelaksanaan, dan pengawasan AI. Maka, pengkajian untuk menganalsis lebih lanjut atas urgensi reformulasi UU ITE dikarenakan belum adanya peraturan spesifik yang mampu menutup kekosongan hukum terkait deepfake. Reformulasi UU ITE menjadi kebutuhan mendesak untuk mengatasi ancaman deepfake, teknologi manipulasi konten berbasis AI yang semakin marak di Indonesia, deepfake menciptakan konten manipulatif tanpa persetujuan korban, sehingga menimbulkan kerugian psikologis, stigma sosial, dan tantangan serius dalam privasi serta keamanan. Adapun penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam penulisan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan pendekatan perundang-undangan melalui analisis undang-undang dan peraturan turunannya dan pendekatan komparasi melalui analisis pengaturan EU AI Act dan China untuk memberikan saran reformulasi. Hasilnya menunjukkan adanya kekosongan hukum yang belum mengatur AI secara spesifik, yang berisiko pada penyalahgunaan teknologi dan menghambat kepastian hukum. Maka dengan membandingkan pengaturan EU dan China AI Act, temuan utama mencakup kebutuhan untuk mengadopsi prinsip-prinsip dasar dari EU AI Act, seperti transparansi, keamanan, dan keadilan, serta klasifikasi risiko untuk sistem AI. UU ITE saat ini belum mengatur aspek-aspek penting seperti labelling, mekanisme pelaporan, dan pengawasan terhadap risiko tinggi dalam sistem AI, serta disarankan untuk membentuk badan pengawas yang bertanggung jawab atas pengelolaan risiko AI.
Pemberantasan Revenge Porn di Lingkungan Sekolah Menengah Atas Ditinjau dengan Hukum Positif di Indonesia Fauzan, Muhammad; Fil'Awalin, Hanif; Aulyanti, Davina Dewi; Desthabu, Meurina; A, Biyandra Timothee; Zahra, Lintang Aulia; Situmeang, Zefanya Angelica; Welgaputri, Feby; Naufal, Muhammad; Siregar, Karina Josephine; Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 2 No 3 (2023): Volume 2, Nomor 3, Agustus 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v2i3.5692

Abstract

Abstract Revenge Porn is booming among children or high school students who meet. More than that, there are rules for revenge porn itself in the laws and regulations. Therefore, there is a need for further research on revenge porn as a crime, the regulation of revenge porn is reviewed by Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence, and to know the reporting procedure when there is a porn revenge case. The research method used is normative research with an approach to laws and regulations. The data collection method used in this research is literature study. The results of this study indicate that revenge porn is a crime if there is an intention of the perpetrator to take revenge on the victim due to several factors such as the hurt experienced by the perpetrator. In addition, there can also be coercion and extortion that can aggravate the perpetrator when it is reported by the victim. In the ITE Law, there is a provision for revenge porn which is contained in Article 27 Paragraph (3). The relevance between the ITE Law and TPKS is the opening of electronic devices in the ITE Law that can be used for the needs of victims in reporting victim evidence with the TPKS Law. The procedure for reporting porn revenge cases can be seen in the Regulation of the Head of the Indonesian Police Number 6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigations.