Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

PEMBUBARAN KORPORASI: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF ANTARA SISTEM HUKUM CIVIL LAW DAN COMMON LAW Aryadi, Arsha Medina; Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8, No 3a (2024): September-Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i3a.10530

Abstract

This research analyzes the dissolution of a company as a consequence of criminal law within the framework of civil law and common law, by comparing the practice in England and Germany. The research aims to show the different approaches to company dissolution. In the UK, compulsory liquidation proceedings and administrative flexibility are prioritized to protect the interests of creditors, whereas in Germany, dissolution requires formal shareholder approval and strict administrative oversight. In addition, this study also explores the factors that influence dissolution decisions and the dispute resolution efforts that arise. Through normative research with a statutory and comparative approach, this study analyzes legal documents and regulations related to dissolution in the two selected countries. Secondary data was collected from the analysis and review of academic literature. The results show that corporate dissolution in the UK emphasizes flexibility through the Companies Act 2006 and the Insolvency Act 1986, while Germany, under the Act on Limited Liability Companies Germany, follows a strict structural process. Both prioritize creditor protection, with the duration of liquidation being shorter in the UK than Germany, which requires a minimum of one year.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS HAK ATAS MEREK SEBAGAI HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL Rahaditya, R.; Goldwen, Filshella; Fernandha, Rizqy Dini; Octavia S, Christine; Aryadi, Arsha Medina; Rahmasari, Lisa
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Universitas Jabal Ghafur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47647/jsh.v6i2.2040

Abstract

Makalah ini menganalisis peran merek dalam Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) serta implikasinya dalam bisnis dan persaingan usaha. Penelitian menegaskan bahwa merek memiliki fungsi penting sebagai tanda pengenal produk atau jasa, mempromosikan usaha, dan membedakan produk serupa. Regulasi tentang merek diatur dalam UU Merek, dengan fokus pada perbedaan produk dan perlindungan hukum terhadap merek. Pendaftaran merek dilakukan di Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual (DJKI) untuk memperoleh perlindungan hukum. Prinsip pendaftaran pertama ("first to file") memberi keunggulan kepada pendaftar pertama. Makalah ini juga membahas pembatalan dan penghapusan merek serta perlindungan hukum terhadap pemilik merek yang meliputi hak eksklusif dan perpanjangan perlindungan merek selama 10 tahun dengan opsi perpanjangan yang dapat dilakukan oleh pemilik atau kuasanya. Penegakan hukum merek melalui pengadilan menjadi tanggung jawab negara jika terjadi pelanggaran terhadap merek yang terdaftar.Kata kunci: Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Merek, Perlindungan Merek.
PERJALANAN MAHASISWA INDONESIA PENERIMA BEASISWA DI ERA SOEKARNO : DARI HARAPAN INTERNASIONALISME KE DAMPAK KEBIJAKAN ANTI-KOMUNISME DI ERA SOEHARTO Aryadi, Arsha Medina; Fernandha, Rizqy Dini
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas Jabal Ghafur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47647/jsh.v7i1.2350

Abstract

In the 1960s, Soekarno sent thousands of students under the Service Bond Student program (MAHID) to continue their education abroad in several communist countries, such as the Soviet Union with the hope that the students who were given scholarships could return and develop Indonesia after studying abroad. However, with the occurrence of the G30SPKI movement, this dream was eliminated by depriving them of their citizenship rights due to anti-communism policies. The research method used in writing this article is a normative legal research method by conducting a literature study to obtain secondary data. The data that has been compiled and obtained in such a way will later be processed with a qualitative descriptive analysis method, then the writing in this research will be carried out using the type of descriptive research nature. Therefore, the presence of 1965 Exiles also provides an expansion of academic studies in the social sciences regarding the views on what is called being Indonesian abroad.Keywords: Exile, Anti-Communism, 1945, G0SPKI
PEMBUBARAN KORPORASI: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF ANTARA SISTEM HUKUM CIVIL LAW DAN COMMON LAW Aryadi, Arsha Medina; Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 3a (2024): September-Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i3a.10530

Abstract

This research analyzes the dissolution of a company as a consequence of criminal law within the framework of civil law and common law, by comparing the practice in England and Germany. The research aims to show the different approaches to company dissolution. In the UK, compulsory liquidation proceedings and administrative flexibility are prioritized to protect the interests of creditors, whereas in Germany, dissolution requires formal shareholder approval and strict administrative oversight. In addition, this study also explores the factors that influence dissolution decisions and the dispute resolution efforts that arise. Through normative research with a statutory and comparative approach, this study analyzes legal documents and regulations related to dissolution in the two selected countries. Secondary data was collected from the analysis and review of academic literature. The results show that corporate dissolution in the UK emphasizes flexibility through the Companies Act 2006 and the Insolvency Act 1986, while Germany, under the Act on Limited Liability Companies Germany, follows a strict structural process. Both prioritize creditor protection, with the duration of liquidation being shorter in the UK than Germany, which requires a minimum of one year.