Articles
<![CDATA[BENTUK UNSUR KESALAHAN ROBOT TRADING DALAM SUATU TINDAK PIDANA DITINJAU DARI ASAS TIADA PIDANA TANPA KESALAHAN (GEEN STRAF ZONDER SCHULD) ]]>
<![CDATA[Aggistri, Zayyan Syafiqah]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahaditya, R.]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 9 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i09.p18
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk melihat unsur kesalahan pada robot trading dalam pemenuhan suatu tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh Korporasi dilihat dari asas tiada pidana tanpa kesalahan (Geen Straf Zonder Schuld) mengingat fungsi dan keunggulan robot trading yang memberikan celah untuk kejahatan terkhususnya pada penipuan investasi dengan robot trading. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normative dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan kasus. Hasil dari penelitian robot trading dianggap seperti manusia, mereka tidak dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawaban karena kesalahan terletak pada orang yang mendesain dan menggunakan robot trading. Saat ini, undang-undang yang mengatur robot trading masih belum lengkap, hanya ada regulasi yang membatasi penasehat perdagangan berjangka, namun tidak termasuk kejahatan yang melibatkan robot trading. This research is intended to look at the element of fault in trading robots in the fulfillment of a criminal offense committed by a corporation seen from the principle of no punishment without fault (Geen Straf Zonder Schuld) considering the functions and advantages of trading robots that provide a loophole for crime, especially in investment fraud with trading robots. This research uses normative legal research with a statutory and case approach. The results of the research trading robots are considered like humans, they cannot be held liable because the fault lies with the person who designs and uses the trading robot. Currently, the laws governing trading robots are still incomplete, there are only regulations that restrict futures trading advisors, but do not include crimes involving trading robots.]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS HAK ATAS MEREK SEBAGAI HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL ]]>
<![CDATA[Rahaditya, R.]]>;
<![CDATA[Goldwen, Filshella]]>;
<![CDATA[Fernandha, Rizqy Dini]]>;
<![CDATA[Octavia S, Christine]]>;
<![CDATA[Aryadi, Arsha Medina]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahmasari, Lisa]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Desember 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jabal Ghafur ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.47647/jsh.v6i2.2040
<![CDATA[Makalah ini menganalisis peran merek dalam Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) serta implikasinya dalam bisnis dan persaingan usaha. Penelitian menegaskan bahwa merek memiliki fungsi penting sebagai tanda pengenal produk atau jasa, mempromosikan usaha, dan membedakan produk serupa. Regulasi tentang merek diatur dalam UU Merek, dengan fokus pada perbedaan produk dan perlindungan hukum terhadap merek. Pendaftaran merek dilakukan di Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual (DJKI) untuk memperoleh perlindungan hukum. Prinsip pendaftaran pertama ("first to file") memberi keunggulan kepada pendaftar pertama. Makalah ini juga membahas pembatalan dan penghapusan merek serta perlindungan hukum terhadap pemilik merek yang meliputi hak eksklusif dan perpanjangan perlindungan merek selama 10 tahun dengan opsi perpanjangan yang dapat dilakukan oleh pemilik atau kuasanya. Penegakan hukum merek melalui pengadilan menjadi tanggung jawab negara jika terjadi pelanggaran terhadap merek yang terdaftar.Kata kunci: Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Merek, Perlindungan Merek.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Protection of Famous Brand Rights (Well-Known Mark) Starbucks (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022) ]]>
<![CDATA[Marchelya*, Vanya]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahaditya, R.]]>
<![CDATA[ Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 6, No 4 (2023): Educational, Historical Studies and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24815/jr.v6i4.35617
<![CDATA[The case pertaining to the disagreement between Starbucks Company and PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company was resolved at the cassation level by Supreme Court Decision Number 836 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022, and at the first level by Commercial Court Decision Number 51/Pdt.Sus/Merek/2021 /PN. Where the conflict arose from the complaint filed in class 34 against PT Sumatra Tobacco Company to cancel the use of the "Starbucks" brand. There were significant discrepancies between the first-level ruling and the cassation-level decision. One of the key elements in analyzing a court decision is the judge's consideration. Thus, disagreements and court rulings will be studied in this study. Since 2012, PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company has had a brand license and registered the "Starbucks" trademark then, in 2020, the new.]]>
<![CDATA[Development of Verbal Creativity Test Based on Creative Industry Sectors ]]>
<![CDATA[Suyasa, P. Tommy Y. S.]]>;
<![CDATA[Setyawan, Ignatius Roni]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahaditya, R.]]>;
<![CDATA[Jessyca, Jessyca]]>;
<![CDATA[Rae, Olivia Beatrix]]>;
<![CDATA[Fahditia, Amala]]>
<![CDATA[ STI Policy and Management Journal Vol 10, No 1 (2025): STI Policy and Management ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/STIPM.2025.413
<![CDATA[TThis study aims to assess the validity and reliability of the verbal creativity test developed in order to identify the creative potential of prospective public relations practitioners who will be tasked with developing and promoting Indonesia’s creative industries. The test developed was named VCT - ICI, which is an abbreviation for Verbal Creativity Test - Indonesian Creative Industries (Tes Kreativitas Verbal - Industri Kreatif Indonesia). This test was structured based on 16 subsectors of Indonesia’s creative industries, which were used as a stimulus in designing test items. The respondents in this study were 201 students majoring in public relations of the faculty of communication sciences from three Indonesia’s universities. Data analysis was carried out to assess the validity and reliability of the verbal creativity test developed. Further analysis produces norms (standard scores) for interpreting the verbal creativity measurement results.]]>
<![CDATA[Law Enforcement Against Fiduciary Credit Guarantee Embezzlement by Debtors Based on Consumer Financing Agreements ]]>
<![CDATA[Putro, Francisca Andriani]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahaditya, R.]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Research ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2199
<![CDATA[This study examines the efficacy of legal enforcement in addressing the criminal offense of fiduciary collateral misappropriation by debtors under consumer financing agreements, with reference to Supreme Court Decision No. 419K/Pid.Sus/2021. Employing a normative- descriptive methodology, the research adopts statutory and case law analysis. The findings reveal inadequacies in current enforcement mechanisms, as the sentencing framework imposes disproportionately lenient penalties, thereby undermining their deterrent function. Further, the study identifies a normative conflict between the sanction provisions of Article 36 of Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Security and Article 372 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), which creates legal uncertainty and diminishes creditor protection. The analysis underscores the imperative of enhancing public legal awareness and fostering academic engagement in the dissemination of fiduciary law principles. To mitigate risks, the study proposes legislative reforms to harmonize penal sanctions and advocates for the institutional adoption of prudential measures by financing entities to deter fiduciary collateral fraud.]]>
<![CDATA[Comparison of Regulations and The Role of Officials Making Land Deeds In The Reconstruction of Land Registration After Natural Disasters ]]>
<![CDATA[Sari Ismail, Winda Puspita]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahaditya, R.]]>
<![CDATA[ Devotion : Journal of Research and Community Service Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Green Publisher Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.36418/dev.v4i1.378
<![CDATA[Indonesia is a country that is on the equator and most of it is a water area. Indonesia is also a country located on the Asian and Australian continents and is directly adjacent to the pacific and indian oceans. So this is what causes Indonesia to be included in the Ring of Fire or Pacific Circle of Fire which is known as a region with many tectonic activities. This legal writing uses normative research methods so that the approach used is a purely normative approach or what is known as normative juridical. This research raises the issue of positive legal provisions of the role of land deed-making officials in the implementation of land registration reconstruction after natural disasters. The implementation of land registration after the natural disaster that occurred on September 28, 2018, Indonesia was hit by an earthquake and tsunami precisely in the Palu area of Central Sulawesi is certainly inseparable from applicable government regulations which are still carried out with various collaborations with other ministries as a form of land registration and provide certainty to legal protection for victims of natural disasters]]>
<![CDATA[Analysis of The Application of Sanctions Against Notaries Who Forgery Deeds of Transferring Land Rights (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 139 K/Pid/2016) ]]>
<![CDATA[Nurwansyah, Muhammad Erizal]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahaditya, R.]]>
<![CDATA[ Devotion : Journal of Research and Community Service Vol. 4 No. 11 (2023): Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Green Publisher Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59188/devotion.v4i11.603
<![CDATA[The Law on the Position of Notaries does not regulate the existence of criminal sanctions for the actions of notaries. This does not absolve the notary from criminal liability. Notaries can be held criminally liable if their actions contain a criminal element, where the relevant Notary can be summoned by the Notary Honorary Council. The problem is how to apply legal sanctions to a notary who falsifies the deed transferring land rights in Supreme Court Decision Number 139 k/PID/2016? And what is the responsibility of the Notary who falsified the deed of transferring land rights in Supreme Court Decision Number 139 K/PID/2016? The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the research are that the Notary concerned cannot be held responsible when elements of fraud and error are committed by the parties, because the Notary only records what is conveyed by the parties to be included in the deed, this is often known as partij deed. False information submitted by the parties is the responsibility of the parties. This means that a notary is only responsible if the fraud originates from the wishes and/or desires of a notary. In the UUJN which regulates sanctions for violations committed by a notary, the deed made by a notary does not have the power of an authentic deed but only has the power of a private deed. In relation to the actions of notaries who commit criminal acts of forgery of deeds or criminal acts of false statements committed by parties, the UUJN does not specifically regulate criminal provisions because they are based on the principle of legality which are the principles in the Criminal Code.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Merek dalam Sengketa Merek ]]>
<![CDATA[Kurniawan, Albert]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahaditya, R.]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Mei - Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Review Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2110
<![CDATA[Tujuan dari adanya penelitian ini adalah mencari wawasan terkait perlindungan hukum yang diperoleh pemilik hak atas merek dan upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan dalam sengketa merek. Meningkatnya tren penjualan yang ada di Indonesia mengakibatkan kenaikan penggunaan merek oleh pelaku usaha untuk produk dan jasa yang dimilikinya. Menggunakan dan mendaftarkan merek dapat membuat pelaku usaha memperoleh banyak keuntungan. Namun di luar keuntungan yang ada, banyak kejadian pelanggaran terhadap pemilik yang sah atas merek sehingga menghadirkan kerugian bagi pelaku usaha. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif analisis untuk mendalami pembuatan Undang – Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, dapat ditemukan bahwa pemerintah memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap pemilik merek yang sah dengan syarat – syarat pendaftaran merek yang dapat mencegah terjadinya pelanggaran terhadap merek. Namun hal tersebut tidak menutup kemungkinan tetap terjadi pelanggaran oleh pihak yang tidak bertanggung jawab. Oleh karena itu pemerintah menyediakan upaya hukum berupa upaya hukum perdata, pidana, maupun administratif yang bisa ditempuh oleh pelaku usaha maupun pihak yang dirugikan melalui sengketa dalam pengadilan]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Tentang Peran Dewan Pengawas KPK Atas Tindak Pidana Pungli di Rutan KPK Jakarta ]]>
<![CDATA[Meagan Tan, Aurelia]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahaditya, R.]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Mei - Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Review Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2111
<![CDATA[Dewan pengawas (dewas) Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), sebagai lembaga yang lahir berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (selanjutnya disebut “UU KPK”), mempunyai tugas dalam hal untuk mengawasi pelaksanaan tugas serta wewenang KPK dan menindak lanjuti laporan dari masyarakat mengenai jika adanya dugaan pelanggaran kode etik oleh pimpinan dan pegawai KPK. Namun, terdapat pasal dalam peraturan dewas tersebut yang bisa dibilang belum efektif dalam menanggulangi bentuk tindak pidana pungli yang terjadi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apa saja peran yang dimiliki dewas KPK dalam menindak lanjuti tindak pidana pungli di Indonesia khususnya yang dilakukan oleh penegak hukumnya. Metode penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, serta peraturan terkait lainnya. Hasil analisis penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman mengenai apa saja kinerja serta tugas dan apakah ada urgensi atas peraturan dewas KPK tersebut. Urgensi yang berkaitan dengan sanksi kode etik yang dalam hal ini apakah sudah memberikan efek jera kepada para tersangka tindak pidana pungli atau belum. Dan juga kemudian hasil penelitian ini untuk dapat memberikan informasi lagi berkaitan dengan apa saja solusi yang dapat diberikan untuk meningkatkan kinerja dewas KPK dalam kaitannya dengan pungli di Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Sertifikat Hak Cipta dan Lisensi Dalam Menjamin Kepastian Hukum Pemegang Hak Cipta Atas Karyanya ]]>
<![CDATA[Jeremy Modami, Brian]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahaditya, R.]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Mei - Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Review Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2149
<![CDATA[Creation produced by the creator deserve proper legal protection. The use of copyrighted works by others can not be arbitrarily used without the creator’s and the holder of the copyright consent. This is because the creator can control what will be done to his creation and prevent the creation is used for harmful things. Creators can obtain permission to use their creations and strengthen their creations. One of the permissions that can be given to other parties is a license. Strengthening copyright protection can be done by obtaining a copyright certificate.]]>
