Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Tanggung Jawab Bagi Perusahaan Penyedia Jasa Pekerja Sehubungan Dengan Pelanggaran Hukum Oleh Pekerja Outsourcing di Tempat Kerja Adfari, Tsabita Rahmah; Camilla, Garneta Rizka; Putri, Cinta Aisyah
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 2, No 5 (2024): Madani, Vol. 2, No. 5 2024
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11489717

Abstract

The current outsourcing practice often receives criticism because it is considered to be detrimental to workers. The work relationships that occur are usually temporary contracts (PKWT), with lower wages, minimal social security, lack of job security, and no guarantee of career development. Therefore, it is not surprising that outsourcing practices are considered to make workers miserable and worsen industrial relations. This condition is difficult to avoid because the main motive for outsourcing is to reduce production costs. The purpose of this research is to determine who is responsible if there is a violation of the law by Outsourced Workers in the workplace and what form of responsibility is taken by the company providing Outsourced Worker services. This research uses two approaches, namely a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Outsourcing which involves the deployment of labor and decision-making power to third parties is regulated in the Employment Law and Job Creation Law so as to ensure clarity in the operation of outsourcing services, namely in Article 66 of the Job Creation Law and PP No. 35 of 2021 regulates the responsibilities of service provider companies and service users towards outsourcing workers. Companies offering outsourced worker services must be responsible for ensuring protection, resolving disputes, and providing compensation if legal violations occur in the workplace.
Pola Pemberitaan CNN, MetroTV, dan TVRI: Analisis Konten dan Perbandingan Media Nurulhuda, Nada Syifa; Pramudya, Aissyah Lintang; Amalia, Selma Dwi; Ritonga, Putra Hamonangan; Syaharani, Zevanya Praja; Narindra, Rochella Amalia; Wicaksana, Dika Hikmah; Widiastiwi, Alisha Reva; Camilla, Garneta Rizka; Sachmaso, Hana Humaira; Putri, Cinta Aisyah
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 2, No 12 (2025): July 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The mass media has a central role in shaping public opinion through agenda setting and framing mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the news reporting patterns applied by CNN Indonesia, MetroTV, and TVRI with a focus on the aspects of factuality, actuality, and accuracy. Through a content analysis approach, this study compares how the three media present certain issues and how the differences in these approaches have implications for public perception of an event. The results of the study show that each media has different news presentation characteristics: CNN Indonesia prioritizes speed and data visualization, MetroTV tends to be analytical with political nuances, while TVRI emphasizes an educational approach and neutrality. These differences reflect variations in framing information that have the potential to influence public opinion differently. This study is expected to contribute to strengthening media literacy and increasing public awareness of the importance of journalistic integrity in conveying information.
Tindakan Wanprestasi Penyalahgunaan Keadaan oleh Developer Rumah pada Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli: Studi Kasus Perkara No. 507/PDT/2017/PT.BDG Adfari, Tsabitah Rahmah; Putri, Cinta Aisyah; Wicaksana, Dika Hikmah; Podungge, Khalisyah Amara; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15600671

Abstract

The Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) is a common instrument in property transactions in Indonesia, but is vulnerable to disputes, including acts of default and abuse of circumstances (misbruik van omstandigheden) by the developer. This normative legal research aims to analyse the forms of abuse of circumstances committed by developers in PPJB and the legal remedies that can be taken by aggrieved buyers. Using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches (Decision No. 507/PDT/2017/PT.BDG), this research examines how developers can exploit their dominant position. The analysis shows that the developer's actions such as repeatedly delaying the handover of the unit despite the full payment, as well as filing a counterclaim against the buyer to avoid liability, can be categorised as an abuse of circumstances. These practices, which often take advantage of the imbalance of bargaining power, violate the principle of good faith and cause harm to consumers. Although not explicitly regulated in the Civil Code, this doctrine is relevant. The main remedy for buyers is through tort actions, demanding fulfilment of the agreement, compensation, or cancellation of the contract, where the argument of abuse of circumstances can strengthen the buyer's position in seeking justice.